Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lifeworld as the Domain of Adaptation Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Phenomenology in Adaptation Planning

Abstract

Based on Schütz’s lifeworld and Schön’s reflective practices, I intend to examine the adaptation planning process of the urban poor. The process is personal and tacit because they live in informal settlements. A planning framework that reflects the past experiences (precedent world) and future expectations (subsequent world) of the urban poor uses the geographical setting of the urban poor, who have practiced adaptation in their everyday lives, and it utilizes locally embedded knowledge. Knowing the lifeworld of flood-affected people is an important step to initiate the adaptation planning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Special Report on Emission Scenario (SRES) includes four types of storylines and scenario families (IPCC 2000). In Indonesia, SRESA1B is seen as the most suitable scenario because it implies that countries will balance their technological sources between fossil-intensive and non-fossil energy sources (Heru Santoso, Interview, 20 August 2012). However, the global circulation model (GCM), which represents physical processes in the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere, and land surface, is the most advanced tool currently available for simulating the response of the global climate system to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. To date, the GCM has succeeded in explaining the climate change phenomenon on regional and national scales, but it is limited in its application at the city and community levels.

  2. 2.

    Kampung is associated with slums and squatters because the dwellers are low-income people. According to Suparlan (2004), slums are identified by improperness, irregularity, communality, social economic stratification, and informality. Squatters are the denizens of slums that are illegally built in prohibited locations and public spaces. The recognition of the kampung as a slum appeared through the Kampung Improvement Program (KIP) in early 2000, which was supported by the World Bank and UNCHS (World Bank 1999). Both agencies denoted the kampung as a slum because it had the same typologies as slums or squatter settlements, which are irregular, self-made residences on land unsuited for residence, such as floodplains, swamps, riverbanks, toll roads, and railway areas.

References

  • ADB – Asian Development Bank. (2011). Community – based climate vulnerability assessment and adaptation planning: A Cook Islands Pilot Project. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4(3–4), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., et al. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climate Change, 93, 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AICP – American Institute of Certified Planners. (2013). History and theory of planning: Why we do and what we do [Review of Georgia Planning Association AICP Exam, January 18]. http://georgiaplanning.org/presentations/AICP_exam_reviews/2013_AICP%20lecture%20on%20theory%20and%20history.pdf

  • Alexander, E. A. (1992). Approaches to planning (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. A. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Journal of Planning Theory, 4(3), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AlSayyad, N., & Roy, A. (2004). Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Washington, DC: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwang, J., Siegel, P. B., & Jorgensen, S. L. (2001). Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines, Social protection discussion paper series. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler, C., & Mersmann, C. (1996). Local knowledge and cultural skills as resources for sustainable forest development. Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrainy, H. (1998). Urban planning and design in a seismic-prone region (Rasht in Northern Iran). Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 124(4), 148–181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1998)124:4(148)

  • Bankoff, G. (2004). The historical geography of disaster: “vulnerability” and “local knowledge” in Western Discourse. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (2014). Alfred Schütz, The Stanford Encyclopedia (Spring Edition). In Edward N. Salta (Ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, H. S. (1980). Sensitizing planners to organization. In P. Clavel, J. Forester, & W. Goldsmith (Eds.), Urban and regional planning in an age of austerity. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, A. (2000). Social movements, activism and social development in the Middle East. Geneva: UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, V. A. (2002). Covert planning for social transformation in Indonesia. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J., Hargreaves, R., & Page, I. C. (2007). Assessment of the need to adapt buildings in New Zealand to the impacts of climate change (p. 179). Porirua: Branz Study Report SR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J. (2005). Danger need not spell disaster – But how vulnerable are we? In Research brief. Tokyo: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J., & Fernando, N. (2008). Measuring revealed and emergent vulnerabilities of coastal communities to tsunami in Sri Lanka. Disasters, 32(1), 82–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M. A., Krass, F., & Quang, N. (2010). Adaptive urban governance-new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, E. J. (2007). Urban planning for climate change. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogardi, J. J., Villagran, J., Birkmann, J., Renaud, F., Sakulski, D., Chen, X., et al. (2005). Vulnerability in the context of climate change. Human security and climate change, an international workshop Holmen fjord hotel, Asker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, H. G. (2001). Vulnerability and criticality: Perspectives from social geography. IHDP Update, 2(2001), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollin, C., Cárdenas, C., Hahn, H., & Vatsa, K. S. (2003). Disaster risk management by communities and local governments. Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briassoulis, H. (1997). How the others plan: Exploring the shape and forms of informal planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(2), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute of Planners (CIP). (2011). Climate change adaptation planning: A handbook for small Canadian communities. CIP. Available at https://www.cip-icu.ca/Files/Resources/RURAL-HANDBOOK-FINALCOPY

  • Cannon, T., Twigg, J., Rowell, J. (2003). Social vulnerability. Sustainable livelihoods and disasters. Report to DFID Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Department (CHAD) and Sustainable Livelihoods Support Office. http://www.benfieldhrc.org/disaster_studies/projects/soc_vuln_sust_live.pdf.

  • Cardona, O. D. (2004). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people (pp. 37–51).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARE. (2010). Community-based adaptation toolkit. Digital toolkit (Version 1.0) July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmin, J., Anguelovski, I., & Roberts, D. (2012). Urban climate adaptation in the global South planning in an emerging policy domain. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(1), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCCD, Commission on Climate Change and Development. (2009). The human dimension of climate adaptation: the importance of local and institutional issues. In Ian Christoplos, Simon Anderson, Margaret, Victor Galaz, Merylyn Hedger, Richard J.T. Klein, & Katell Le Goulven (Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century: Institute of Development Studies (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, G., Ibert, O., Kilper, H., & Moss, T.U. (2012). Vulnerability and Resilience from a Socio-Spatial Perspective, Towards a Theoretical Framework. Working Paper, Erkner, Leibniz Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoplos, I., Anderson, S., Arnold, M., Galaz, V., Hedger, M., Klein, R. J., & Goulven, K. (2009). The human dimension of climate adaptation: The importance of local and institutional issues. Stockholm: Commission on Climate Change and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm, M. (2010). Mapping Social-Ecological Vulnerability to Flooding. Graduate Research Series, PhD Dissertations Publication Series of UNU-EHS, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R. B. (1981). The shadow of organization. Lawrence: The Regents Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. (1997). An urban earthquake disaster risk index. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Technical Report Series. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID – The Department for International Development of UK. (2005). Natural disaster and disaster risk reduction measures: A desk review of costs and benefits. London: UK Department for International Development, The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlert, J. (2012). We observe the weather because we are farmers: Weather knowledge and meteorology in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. In A.-K. Hornidge & C. Antweiler (Eds.), Environmental uncertainty and local knowledge Southeast Asia as a Laboratory of Global Ecological Change. Biefeld: Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, I. (2000). The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S., & Campbell, S. (2003). Readings in planning theory. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete, A. (2010). Assessment of social vulnerability to river floods in Germany. In Graduate Research Series, PhD Dissertations: Publication Series of UNU-EHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, E. (1994). Defending collective interests in Brazilian environmental law: An assessment of the civil public action. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 3(4), 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firman, T., Surbakti, I. M., Idroes, I. C., & Simarmata, H. A. (2011). Potential climate-change related vulnerabilities in Jakarta: Challenges and current status. Habitat International, 35(2), 372–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U., Kardorff, E. V., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., & Romm, N. R. A. (1996). Diversity management: Triple loop learning. Chicester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J., & Stitzel, D. (1989). Beyond neutrality. Negotiation Journal, 5(3), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J., Clavel, P., & Goldsmith, W. (1980). Urban and regional planning in an age of austerity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1984). Agropolitan development: A territorial approach to meeting basic needs. In D. Korten & R. Klauss (Eds.), People center development: Contributions towards theory and planning framework (pp. 210–239). West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2000). The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2008). The uses of planning theory a bibliographic essay. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(2), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel, H.-M. (2007). Adaptation planning for climate change: Concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, J.-C. (2010). Vulnerability, capacity and resilience: Perspectives for climate and development policy. Journal of International Development, 22(2), 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garison Institute (2013). The human dimensions of resilient and sustainable cities: Exploring strategies for working with people, organizations, and social networks to forestall crises and enhance the ability of cities to bounce back from crises. Climate, Cities, and Behaviour Symposium: Synthesis Report. Garrison Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2011). Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, D. E. (2000). By design: The disaster resistant and quality-of-life community. Natural Hazards Review, 1(3), 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gran, G. (1983). Development by people citizen construction of a just world. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, M., & Elander, I. (2007). Local governance and climate change: Reflections on the Swedish experience. Local Environment, 12(5), 537–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan, L. D., & Zoomers, A. (2005). Exploring the frontier of livelihoods research. Development and Change, 36(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society (book). (Thomas A. McCarthy, Trans). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-1507-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, A. (2004). The changing nature of the informal sector in Karachi due to global restructing and liberalisation and its repercussions. In A. Roy & N. Alsayyad (Eds.), Urban informality. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2007). The new institutionalism and the transformative goals of planning. Institutions and Planning, 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P. A. (2001). The lifeworld and scientific interpretation. Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 47–66). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of risk: A geographical introduction to disasters. Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, J. (2003). Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Planning Theory, 2(1), 37–59. doi:10.1177/1473095203002001005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (2006). What are institutions?. Journal of Economic Issues XL No 1 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornidge, A. K. (2011). Institutions: Conceptual food for thought. Paper Presented at the Disciplinary Doctoral Program. ZEF, December 5, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornidge, A.-K., & Antweiler, C. (2012). In A.-K. Hornidge & C. Antweiler (Eds.), Environmental uncertainty and local knowledge: Southeast Asia as a laboratory of global ecological change. Bielefeld: Transcript Bielefeld.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hornidge, A.-K., & Scholtes, F. (2012). Climate change and everyday life in toineke village, west timor: Uncertainties, knowledge and adaptation. Sociologus, 61(2), 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, R. P. (1982). Phenomenology in planning, policy, & administration. JSTOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, M. (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IISD – International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2012). CRiSTAL user manual version 5: Community-based risk screening tool-adaptation and livelihood. IISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2000). IPCC Special report on emissions scenario: Summary for policy makers. Special Report on IPCC Working Group III. IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II. In M. Parry, O. Canziani, J. Palutikof, P. van der Linden, & C. Hanson (Eds.), The fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In C. B. Field, V. Barros, T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, D. J. Dokken, K. L. Ebi, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S. K. Allen, M. Tignor, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Special report of Working Groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSC/UNESCO. (2013). World social science report 2013: Changing environments. Paris: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellinek, L. (1999). Kampung culture or consumer culture. In Consuming cities: The urban environment in the global economy after Rio. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • KBBI– Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (1991). Bahasa, Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan, Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Balai Pustaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47(4), 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. (1990). Getting to the 21st century: Voluntary action and the global agenda. Connecticut: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D., & Garner, G. (1984). Planning frameworks for people centered development. In D. C. Korten & R. Klauss (Eds.), People center development: Contributions towards theory and planning framework (pp. 201–209). West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, C. (2005). Revisiting ‘community’ in community-based natural resource management. Community Development Journal, 40, 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, N. (2003). The Case of Kolkata, India. Understanding Slums: Case Studies for the Global Report on Human Settlements 2003. Development Planning Unit: UN-Habitat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruppu, N., & Liverman, D. (2011). Mental preparation for climate adaptation: The role of cognition and culture in enhancing adaptive capacity of water management in Kiribati. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 657–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukkonen, J., Blanco, P. K., Lenhart, J., Keiner, M., Cavric, B., & Njenga, C. (2009). Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. Habitat International, 33(3), 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lont, H. (2005). Juggling money: Financial self-help organizations and social security in Yogyakarta. Leiden: University of Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B., & Cartwright, S. (2008). Assessing a community’s capacity to manage change: A resilience approach to social assessment. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen, L. (1990). Third world housing in social and spatial development: The case of Jakarta. Avebury: The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäntysalo, R. (2004). Approaches to participation in urban planning theories. Article of Department of Architecture. Finland: University of Oulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, C., Canepa, C., & Ferreira, S. (2007). Reflective practice: An approach for expanding your learning frontiers. New York: MIT Open Course Ware.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, J. D., Freitas, C. R., & Carter, R. M. (2009). Influence of the southern oscillation on tropospheric temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmosphere, 114(D14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercy Corps Indonesia. (2010). Community Profile of RW 17 Penjaringan. Survey Report. Jakarta: Mercy Corps Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercy Corps. (2011). Local Resilience Action Plan (LRAP) Report from 3 Pilot Kelurahan: Technical assistance for climate resilient cities by implementing Kelurahan Empowerment Initiative (KEI) – DKI Jakarta. Jakarta: Mercy Corps Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, K. (2007). On the concept of Village in Northeastern Afghanistan: Explorations from Kunduz province. ZEF Working Paper Series 70/Amu Darya Project Working Paper No. 6. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moench, M., Tyler, S., & Lage, J. (2011). Catalyzing urban climate resilience: Applying resilience concepts to planning practice in the ACCCRN program (2009–2011). Boulder: Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. O. N. (1978). Informal sector or petty commodity production: Dualism or dependence in urban development? World Development, 6(9/10), 1799–1825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1), 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkasa, V., & Hendyotio, M. K. (2003). Inventing participation: The dynamics of PKK, Arisan and Kerja bakti in the context of urban Jakarta. In N. Yoshihara & R. D. Dwianto (Eds.), Grass roots and the neighborhood associationsm. Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, N., Ranghieri, F., Shah, F., Trohanis, Z., Kessler, E., & Sinha, R. (2009). Climate resilient cities: A primer on reducing vulnerabilities to disasters. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L. F. (2007). Climate change adaptation and development: Exploring the linkages. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper, 107, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs, M. A. (2008). From the bottom up: Local and Subnatinal climate change politics. The Joutnal of Environment and Development, 17(4), 343–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A.L. (1973). The structures of the life-world (Vol. 1). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974). The structures of the life-world. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems: Pearson Education (US); International 2 Revised edition (Mar. 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, J., & Smit, B. (1997). Human adaptation to climatic variability and change. Global Environmental Change, 7(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snidvongs, A. (2010). Climate change vulnerability assessment and urban development planning for Asian Coastal Cities, Final report submitted to APN-Project Reference Number: CIA2009-01-Snidvongs

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V. (2005). Common senses water, sensory experience and the generation of meaning. Journal of Material Culture, 10(1), 92–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudaryono. (2012). Fenomenologi Sebagai Epistemologi Baru dalam Perencanaan Kota dan Permukiman. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar pada Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gajah Mada, Universitas Gajah Mada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suparlan, P. (2004). Masyarakat & Kebudayaan Perkotaan; Perspektif Antropologi Perkotaan. Jakarta: YPKIK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitz, M. B. (2007). Planning and the new institutionalisms. In N. Verma (Ed.), Institutions and planning: Analogical inquiry, current research in urban and regional studies. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakoerdin, O. S. J. (2009). Climate change adaptation Handbook for mayors. Background Paper, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–8078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP – United Nation Development Programme. (2004). Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP – United Nation Development Programme. (2008) Adapting to the inevitable: National action and international cooperation. Fighting climate change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World, UNDP. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007-2008

  • UNDP. (2012). Annual report for PIMS: 3508-Community based adaptation to climate change (GEF SPA-Global FSP). UNDP. Available at http://www.adaptationundporg/sites/default/files/downloads/annual_report_of_2012_aj-cn_2_0.pdf

  • UNFCCC (2009). Adaptation assessment, planning and practice: an overview from the Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. In United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Ed.). Bonn: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2004). Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiative. Geneva: UNISDR Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNU-EHS. (2011). Climate change and fragile states: Rethinking adaptation. In United Nations University (Ed.), UNU-EHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (2009). Adapting to coastal climate change: A guidebook for development planners. USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dillen, S. (2004). Different choices: Assessing vulnerability in a South Indian village. Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, N. (2007). Institutions and planning: Current research in urban and regional studies. Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. R. (1970). Alfred Schütz on phenomenology and social relations. In H. R. Wagner (Ed.), The heritage of sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weichhart, P. (2010). Social geography and spatial planning: On people and life-world rationality in the planning process: Speech notes. Salzburg. http://socgeo.ruhosting.nl/colloquium/Weichhart2.pdf

  • Wilhelm, M. (2011). The role of community resilience in adaptation to climate change: The urban poor in Jakarta, Indonesia. Resilient Cities Journal, 45–53. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiryomartono, A. B. P. (1995). Seni Bangunan dan Seni Binakota di Indonesia: Kajian mengenai konsep, struktur, dan elemen fisik kota sejak peradaban Hindu-Buddha, Islam hingga sekarang. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk-natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2004). Understanding the economics and financial impacts of natural disasters. Disaster Risk Management Series No. 4. The World Bank, DC. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/146811468757215744/pdf/284060PAPER0Disaster0Risk0no-04.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Hendricus Andy Simarmata

Authors
  1. Hendricus Andy Simarmata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simarmata, H.A. (2018). Lifeworld as the Domain of Adaptation Planning. In: Phenomenology in Adaptation Planning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5496-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5496-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5495-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5496-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation