Advertisement

The Potentials and Trends of Virtual Reality in Education

A Bibliometric Analysis on Top Research Studies in the Last Two Decades
  • Dejian Liu
  • Kaushal Kumar BhagatEmail author
  • Yuan Gao
  • Ting-Wen Chang
  • Ronghuai Huang
Part of the Smart Computing and Intelligence book series (SMCOMINT)

Abstract

Virtual reality has gained worldwide interest among the researchers in the field of educational technology recently. This chapter presents an overview of virtual reality research in education and also a bibliometric analysis was performed to evaluate the publications on virtual reality from 1995 to 2016, based on the Thomson Reuters’s Web of Science (WoS). A total of 975 related documents were analyzed based on their publication patterns (documents types and languages, major journals and their publications, most prolific authors, most productive journals and their publications, and international collaborations). Bibliometric results show that the number of article has been increasing since 1995 exponentially. USA, UK and Chinese Taipei are the top 3 most productive countries/regions which are involved in virtual reality research in education. The findings would help the researchers to understand current developments and barriers in applications of virtual reality in education.

Keywords

Virtual reality Education Bibliometric analysis 

References

  1. Aretz, A. J. (1991). The design of electronic map displays. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 33(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., & Rey, B. (2004). Immersion and emotion: Their impact on the sense of presence. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(6), 734–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107. doi: 10.1007/bf02504859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence, 12(5), 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botden, S. M., Buzink, S. N., Schijven, M. P., & Jakimowicz, J. J. (2007). A comparison of the promis augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus lapsim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator: What is the difference? World Journal of Surgery, 31(4), 764–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boud, A. C., Haniff, D. J., Baber, C., & Steiner, S. J. (1999). Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization, 1999 (pp. 32–36). IEEE.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, D. A., & McMahan, R. P. (2007). Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer, 40(7), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., Macintyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology (Vol. 1). Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, C. H., Yang, J. C., Shen, S., & Jeng, M. C. (2007). A desktop virtual reality earth motion system in astronomy education. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 289–304.Google Scholar
  11. Coelho, C., Tichon, J. G., Hine, T. J., Wallis, G. M., & Riva, G. (2006). Media presence and inner presence: The sense of presence in virtual reality technologies (pp. 25–45). From Communication Topresence: Cognition, emotions and culture towards the ultimate communicative experience.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham, D., & Duffy, T. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198).Google Scholar
  13. Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawley, L. (2009). Social network knowledge construction: Emerging virtual world pedagogy. On the Horizon, 17(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawley, L., & Dede, C. (2014). Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 723–734). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of Second DMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S. (2012). A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 949–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foley, J. D. (1987). Interfaces for advanced computing. Scientific American, 257(4), 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmes, J. (2007). Designing agents to support learning by explaining. Computers & Education, 48(4), 523–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D., & Wagner, M. (2000). Construct3D: A virtual reality application for mathematics and geometry education. Education and Information Technologies, 5(4), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lanier, J. (1989). Virtual reality: A status report (pp. 272–279). Cyberarts: Exploring art and technology.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, E. A. L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Limniou, M., Roberts, D., & Papadopoulos, N. (2008). Full immersive virtual environment CAVE TM in chemistry education. Computers & Education, 51(2), 584–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lombard, M. (2000). Resources for the study of presence: Presence explication. Retrieved September, 3, 2000.Google Scholar
  27. Matthews, A. H., Abdelrahman, T., Powell, A. G., & Lewis, W. G. (2016). Surgical EDUCATION’S 100 most cited articles: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Surgical Education, 73(5), 919–929. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merwin, D. H., & Wickens, C. D. (1991, September). 2-D vs. 3-D display for multidimensional data visualization: The relationship between task integrality and display proximity. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 388–392). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Messinger, P. R., Stroulia, E., & Lyons, K. (2008). A typology of virtual worlds: Historical overview and future directions. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1).Google Scholar
  30. Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.Google Scholar
  32. Minogue, J., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewall, T. (2006). The impact of haptic augmentation on middle school students’ conceptions of the animal cell. Virtual Reality, 10(3–4), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morehead, M., Jones, Q., Blatt, J., Holcomb, P., Schultz, J., DeFanti, T., … & Spirou, G. A. (2014, March). Poster: BrainTrek-An immersive environment for investigating neuronal tissue. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), (pp. 157–158). IEEE.Google Scholar
  34. Nagy, P., & Koles, B. (2014). The digital transformation of human identity towards a conceptual model of virtual identity in virtual worlds. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1354856514531532.Google Scholar
  35. Nicholson, D. T., Chalk, C., Funnell, W. R. J., & Daniel, S. J. (2006). Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Medical Education, 40(11), 1081–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pantelidis, V. S. (1993). Virtual reality in the classroom. Educational Technology, 33(4), 23–27.Google Scholar
  37. Papagiannidis, S., Bourlakis, M., & Li, F. (2008). Making real money in virtual worlds: MMORPGs and emerging business opportunities, challenges and ethical implications in metaverses. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(5), 610–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Porter, C. E. (2004). A typology of virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(3).Google Scholar
  39. Riva, G., Waterworth, J. A., & Waterworth, E. L. (2004). The layers of presence: A bio-cultural approach to understanding presence in natural and mediated environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sato, M., Liu, X., Murayama, J., Akahane, K., & Isshiki, M. (2008). A haptic virtual environment for molecular chemistry education. In Transactions on edutainment I (pp. 28–39). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Seymour, N. E., Gallagher, A. G., Roman, S. A., O’Brien, M. K., Bansal, V. K., Andersen, D. K., et al. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery, 236(4), 458–463. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000028969.51489.b4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sierra, L. M. B., Gutiérrez, R. S., & Garzón-Castro, C. L. (2012). Second Life as a support element for learning electronic related subjects: A real case. Computers & Education, 58(1), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sourin, A., Sourina, O., & Prasolova-Førland, E. (2006). Cyber-learning in cyberworlds. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 8(4), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spence, J. (2008). Demographics of virtual worlds. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 1(2).Google Scholar
  45. Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The ultimate display. Multimedia: From Wagner to virtual reality.Google Scholar
  46. Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory: A special issue of educational psychologist. LEA.Google Scholar
  47. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1–2), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, T. L. (2002). Living digitally: Embodiment in virtual worlds. In The social life of Avatars (pp. 40–62). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Tseng, Y.-H., Chang, C.-Y., Tutwiler, M. S., Lin, M.-C., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2013). A scientometric analysis of the effectiveness of Taiwan’s educational research projects. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1141–1166. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0966-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yair, Y., Mintz, R., & Litvak, S. (2001). 3D-virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(3), 293–306.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang, B., Liu, Y., Tian, C., Wang, Z., Cheng, M., Chen, N., et al. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of research on upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) from 1983 to 2012. Scientometrics, 100(1), 189–202. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1189-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, 1, 21–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dejian Liu
    • 1
  • Kaushal Kumar Bhagat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yuan Gao
    • 1
  • Ting-Wen Chang
    • 1
  • Ronghuai Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Smart Learning InstituteBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations