Advertisement

Implicit Learning Through Embodiment in Immersive Virtual Reality

  • Mel SlaterEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Smart Computing and Intelligence book series (SMCOMINT)

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) typically results in the illusion of presence. The participant in a VR scenario typically has the illusion of being in the virtual place, and under the right conditions the further illusion that events that are occurring there are really occurring. We review how these properties are useful for the application of VR in education. We present a further illusion that can be triggered in VR referred to as body ownership. This can occur when the participant sees a life-sized virtual body substituting her or his own, from first person perspective. This virtual body can be programmed to move synchronously with the participant’s real body movements, thus leading to the perceptual illusion that the virtual body is her or his actual body. We survey various experiments that show that the form of the virtual body can result in implicit changes in attitudes, perception and cognition, and changes in behavior. We compare this with the process of implicit learning and conclude that virtual body ownership and its consequences may be used as a form of implicit learning. We conclude by suggesting how the study of the relationship between body ownership and implicit learning might be taken forward.

Keywords

Virtual reality Education Implicit learning Embodiment Body ownership 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Some of the work described in this article was the product of various funded projects: Ser Einstein: la influencia de internalizar un cuerpo virtual en la inteligencia, Ministerio de Economía, Industria, y Competitividad, Spain (PSI2014-56301-R); Virtual Embodiment and Robotic Re-Embodiment (VERE) European Union FET (#257695); Transcending Reality—Activating Virtual Environment Responses through Sensory Enrichment (TRAVERSE) European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant (#227985); BEAMING, Augmented Multi-Modal Naturally-Networked Gatherings, FP7 EU collaborative project (#248620).

References

  1. Agus, T. R., Thorpe, S. J., & Pressnitzer, D. (2010). Rapid formation of robust auditory memories: insights from noise. Neuron, 66(4), 610–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailenson, J., Patel, K., Nielsen, A., Bajscy, R., Jung, S.-H., & Kurillo, G. (2008a). The effect of interactivity on learning physical actions in virtual reality. Media Psychology, 11(3), 354–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailenson, J., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008b). The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 102–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banakou, D., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2013). Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. PNAS, 110, 12846–12851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306779110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banakou, D., PD, H., & Slater, M. (2016). Virtual embodiment of White People in a black virtual body leads to a sustained reduction in their implicit racial bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 601. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00601.
  6. Banakou, D., & Slater, M. (2014). Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking. PNAS, 111(49), 17678–17683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414936111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, M. D., & Weinstein, A. (2011). Simulated job interview skill training for people with psychiatric disability: Feasibility and tolerability of virtual reality training. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(suppl 2), S91–S97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-Perception Theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanke, O., Slater, M., & Serino, A. (2015). Behavioral, neural, and computational principles of bodily self-consciousness. Neuron, 88(1), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756. doi: 10.1038/35784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cargill, R. R. (2008). The Qumran digital model: An argument for archaeological reconstruction in virtual reality. ProQuest.Google Scholar
  12. Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, R. B., & Ash, K. (1997). Using virtual reality technology to convey abstract scientific concepts. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.136.4289&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  13. Foti, F., De Crescenzo, F., Vivanti, G., Menghini, D., & Vicari, S. (2015). Implicit learning in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 45(05), 897–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, D., Evans, N., Lister, R., Antley, A., Dunn, G., & Slater, M. (2013). Height, social comparison, and paranoia: An immersive virtual reality experimental study. Psychiatry Research, 213(3), 348–352. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.014.Google Scholar
  16. Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the Art and perspectives. In Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE) (Bucharest, Romania, April 23–24, 2015).Google Scholar
  17. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groom, V., Bailenson, J. N., & Nass, C. (2009). The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. Social Influence, 4, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hwang, W.-Y., & Hu, S.-S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education, 62, 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D., & Wagner, M. (2000). Construct3D: A virtual reality application for mathematics and geometry education. Education and information technologies, 5(4), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kessels, R. P., & Haan, E. H. (2003). Implicit learning in memory rehabilitation: A meta-analysis on errorless learning and vanishing cues methods. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(6), 805–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kilteni, K., Bergstrom, I., & Slater, M. (2013). Drumming in immersive virtual reality: The body shapes the way we play. Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 597–605. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kokkinara, E., & Slater, M. (2014). Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception, 43(1), 43–58. doi: 10.1068/p7545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lanier, J. (2006). Homuncular flexibility. Edge: The World Question Center. Accessed November, 26, 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Lin, H., Chen, M., Lu, G., Zhu, Q., Gong, J., You, X., et al. (2013). Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs): A new generation of geographic analysis tool. Earth-Science Reviews, 126, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maister, L., Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition, 128, 170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Masters, R., Lo, C., Maxwell, J., & Patil, N. (2008). Implicit motor learning in surgery: Implications for multi-tasking. Surgery, 143(1), 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moseley, G. L., Olthof, N., Venema, A., Don, S., Wijers, M., Gallace, A., et al. (2008). Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 13169–13173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803768105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Müns, A., Meixensberger, J., & Lindner, D. (2014). Evaluation of a novel phantom-based neurosurgical training system. Surgical Neurology International, 5, 173.Google Scholar
  31. O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Osimo, S. A., Pizarro, R., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2015). Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud—A virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. Scientific Reports, 5, 13899. doi: 10.1038/srep13899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pan, X., Gillies, M., Barker, C., Clark, D. M., & Slater, M. (2012). Socially anxious and confident men interact with a forward virtual woman: An experimental study. PLoS ONE, 7, e32931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peck, T. C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S. M., & Slater, M. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 779–787. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). If I Were You: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS ONE, 3, e3832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(6), 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reber, P. J. (2013). The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 2026–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roussou, M. (2009). A VR playground for learning abstract mathematics concepts. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 29(1), 82–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salomon, R., Lim, M., Pfeiffer, C., Gassert, R., & Blanke, O. (2013). Full body illusion is associated with widespread skin temperature reduction. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, (submitted).Google Scholar
  41. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slater, M. (2009). Place Illusion and Plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 364, 3549–3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H. H., & Sanchez-Vives, M. (2008). Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008.
  45. Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  46. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Blanke, O. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE, 5(5), e10564–e10564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van der Hoort, B., Guterstam, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). Being Barbie: The size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS ONE, 6, e20195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vine, S. J., Masters, R. S., McGrath, J. S., Bright, E., & Wilson, M. R. (2012). Cheating experience: Guiding novices to adopt the gaze strategies of experts expedites the learning of technical laparoscopic skills. Surgery, 152(1), 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson, M. R., Vine, S. J., Bright, E., Masters, R. S., Defriend, D., & McGrath, J. S. (2011). Gaze training enhances laparoscopic technical skill acquisition and multi-tasking performance: A randomized, controlled study. Surgical Endoscopy, 25(12), 3731–3739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. N. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institució Catalana de Recerca I Estudis Avançats (ICREA)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.University College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations