Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Elemental Determinants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Masters of the Structural Aesthetic

  • 1103 Accesses

Abstract

In order to provide substantial argument in the evaluation of the ‘structural aesthetic’, this chapter explores the most significant determining elements. The true measure of aesthetic experience requires convincing formulation and is explored in the research of recognised commentators on aesthetic appreciation. Apart from cognitive and subjectivity aspects that underly the appreciation of architecture as an art form, the role of more pragmatic factors is evaluated, such as symbolism, the contextual framework, or the setting, together with the attributes of symmetrical and asymmetrical form in which architecture is conceived. History has shown that the role of the patron is paramount in the formulation of the architect’s brief., thereby challenging ethical standards. Equal importance is given to the imperatives of religious and secular practices around the globe that to a greater or lesser extent have a bearing on the shape and scale on aspirations that have guided the architects’ briefs. As with all enterprises, architecture is influenced by the availability of the materials, methods and resources available economically at the time, thereby becoming important constraints. Nature as mentor or model for form for architectural work is given recognition and expression through evolved forms of geometry including ‘fractal’ geometry that embodies thematic transformation. By way of the application of natural forms in design, the development of digitally-aided parametric design has pioneered a new approach in contemporary architecture and is recognised as the successor to post-modern and modern architecture. The future of paradigm shifts that are unavoidable include the use of artificial intelligence, of Smart materials, the rise of social media and the interruptive influence of the avant-garde into the established cultural milieu. Collectively these imply new trajectories that are bound to be expressed in architectural design in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

References 2.1

  • Agostinho, F. S. (2005). Architecture as drawing, perception and cognition (p. 89). Background for an exercise of computer modeling applied to the Church of Sta. Maria de Belém – Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atalay, M. (2007). Kant’s aesthetic theory: Subjectivity vs. universal validity (pp. 44–52). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. 1994. The poetics of space (Vol. xxii). Boston: Beacon Press (in French 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and Answerability: The Early Essays of M M Bakhtin. In V. Liapunov, K. Brosteom, M. Holquist. (Trans.) (pp. 278–279). Austin, TX: Vadim Liapunov and Kenneth Brostrom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkin, J. M. (2002a). Review of cultural software – A theory of ideology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, R., & Sinclair, B. R. (2013a). Spirituality in place: building connections between architecture, design, and spiritual experience (p. 80). Alberta: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. D. (1933a). Aesthetic measure (pp. 3–4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, G. (2012a, September). Architecture as political image: The perspective of advertising. Architecture_Media_Politics_Society, 1(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching, F. D. K. (1979). Architecture: Form, space and order (p. 300). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciftcioglu, O., & Bitterman, M. S. (2013). Fusion of perceptions in architectural design. eCAADe 2013. In Conference (Education and research in computer aided architectural design in europe) September 18–20, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, B. (2013). Judgement, criticism and taste. In. Section 7, Croce’s aesthetics (Revised version). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson, C. B. (2011). Experiencing architecture – exploring the soul of the eye (p. 95, 101). Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2006a). The selfish gene (3rd Revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doczi, G. (1985). Proportional harmonies in architecture and nature: The power of limits (pp. 3–16). Boston, MA: Shambala.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. (2005). Study of architectural symbolism. In Chapter 2: Development of symbolic pedagogical tools for communication in architecture (pp. 24–25). Calicut: Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT, University of Calicut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khabazi, Z. (2011). Generative algorithms (using Grasshopper) (p. 7). Digital version published by: Morphogenesism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. R. (1980a). Structural aesthetics in architecture and its social and technological relevance (p. 137). Article in Zeitschrift: IABSE congress report AIPC=IVBH, Kongressbericht Nov 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. P. (1972). Analytical enquiry into the principles of taste (p. 197). Gregg International, University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & August, D. (2004, November). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitias, M. H. M. (1977). The aesthetic object: Critical studies. Washington: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. In Environment and behaviour (pp. 377–401). Columbus: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, K. K. (2009). Aesthetic appreciation. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), The encyclopedia of positive psychology (Vol. 1 A, p. 21). Chichester: Wiley and Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Aesthetic appreciation. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), The encyclopedia of positive psychology. Chichester: Wiley and Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, A. (2003). Foundations of art and design (pp. 194, 198, 211). London: Laurence King.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art. A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, H. (1984). The meaning of art (pp. 17–48). London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, N. A. (1999a). Architecture, patterns and mathematics. Nexus Network Journal on Line, 1(2), 75–85.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vali, A. P., & Nasekhiyan, S. (2014a). The concept and sense of place in architecture from phenomenological approach. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4, 3746–3753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (2008). The myth of meaningful forms. Philosophy and architecture. In W. T. Baker (Ed.), Architecture of excellence in diverse world culture (p. 68). Mulgrave: Images Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

Online

References 2.2

  • Çizgen, G. (2012). What is context, why it is important? In Rethinking the role of context and contextualism in architecture and design (pp. 9, 12, 14, 30, 39). Submitted to the Institute of Graduate Studies and Research: Degree of Msc. in Architecture. Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimağusa, North Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. A. (1994). Theory architecture concepts principles: Concepts, themes and practices (pp. 39–284). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vali, A. P., & Nasekhiyan, S. (2014c). The concept and sense of place in architecture from phenomenological approach. International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4, 3746–3753.

    Google Scholar 

References 2.3

  • Cairns, G. (2012b, September). Architecture as political image: The perspective of advertising. Architecture_Media_Politics_Society, 1(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dameron, G. W. (1991a). Episcopal power and florentine society 1000–1320. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, B. (1948a). Gothic architecture 2: Architectural character. In A history of architecture on the comparative method (14th ed., p. 340). London: B.T. Batsford Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulton, G. G. (1928). Life in the middle ages (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.p. 24). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, T. G. (1987). Gothic Art 1140-1450C (p. 24). Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London in Assoc. with the Medieval Academy of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1992). The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In J. Coote & A. Shelton (Eds.), Anthropology, art, and aesthetics (pp. 40–66). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, L. (1964). The machine in the garden: Technology and the pastoral ideal in America (p. 195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, R. J. W. (1997a). Structural engineering: History and development (pp. 42–56). London: CRC Press. T&G Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudjic, D. (2006). The edifice complex: How the rich and powerful shape the world (p. 32). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Online

References 2.4

  • Birch, R., & Sinclair, B. R. (2013b). Spirituality in place: Building connections between architecture, design, and spiritual experience (pp. 80–81). Alberta: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, B. (1948b). A history of architecture on the comparative method (14th ed.p. 597). London: B.T. Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groys, B. (2013a). Becoming revolutionary: On Kazimir Malevich. In Booklet: Russian Red (J Wasiliew). 21.09 to 25.10.2013 (p. 6, 8, 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, R. J. W. (1997b). Structural engineering: History and development (pp. 42, 47, 56). London: CRC Press. T&G Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, B. (2011). Contemplating the spiritual ethos within a holistic framework for design and planning. In 12th Symposium on Sustainable Development: Theories, Strategies and Global Governance Systems 1.1 (p. 4), Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietz, J. (1999). The story of architecture of the 20th century (pp. 19–20). Cologne: Könemann.

    Google Scholar 

Online

References 2.5

  • Addington, D. M., & Schodeck, D. L. (2005a). Smart materials and new technologies – For the architecture and design professions. In Materials and architecture 1.1 (pp. 201–238). New York: Architectural Press (imprint of Elsevier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daveiga, J., & Ferreira, P.. (2005a). Smart and nano materials in architecture. ACADIA05: Smart architecture. Austin: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nervi, P. L. (1955). Concrete and structural form. The Architect and Building News, 208(27), 523–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Merwe, D. (2013, August). Concrete, the liquid stone of the 21st century. In Leading architecture and design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayman, E. (2011a). The secrets of ancient Rome’s buildings. What is it about Roman concrete that keeps the Pantheon and the Colosseum still standing? Assist. Ed. Smithsonian Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

Online

References 2.6

  • Ahuja, A. (2016). Integration of nature and technology for smart cities. 13.1 Biophilic design (3rd ed.pp. 331–332). Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, S., & Sorguc, A. G. (2004). Similarities between “structures in nature”and “man-made structures”: Biomimesis in architecture. In Collins, M W., & Brebbia, C. A. (Eds.), Design and Nature II (p. 48). Department of Architecture, Middle East Technical University, Turkey. WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus, J. M. (1998). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus, J. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York, NY: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A., Kirkegaard, P. H., & Tyrell, R. (2013). The nature of tectonic architecture and structural design. In P. J. da Sousa Cruz (Ed.), Structures and architecture: New concepts, applications and challenges (p. 237). London: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frazl, P. (2007a, September). Biomimetic materials research: What can we really learn from Nature’s structural materials? Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 637–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. M. (2001). Sparks of genius. The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people (p. 145). Boston, MA: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R. (2002). Utzon: Inspiration vision architecture (p. 11). Copenhagen: Hellerup Edition Bløndal.

    Google Scholar 

Online

References 2.7

  • Briggs, J. (1992). Fractals, the patterns of chaos, A new aesthetic of art, science, and nature (pp. 14, 69–70). New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1997). Chaos: Making a new science (pp. 100–103, 117). London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi, M. G., & Mauro, F. (2010). Art and mathematics in Antoni Gaudi’s architecture: ‘La Sagrada Familia’. Journal of Applied Mathematics (Aplimat), 3(1), 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramzy, N. S. (2015). The dual language of geometry in Gothic architecture: The symbolic message of euclidian geometry versus the visual dialogue of fractal geometry. Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture, 3(2), 138, 157, 165, 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1977). The fractal geometry of nature. Theme 1 (p. 1). San Francisco: W H Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, N. (2007). Complex and fractal components in industrial design. International Journal of Design and Nature, 1(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, N. A. (1999b). Architecture, patterns and mathematics. Nexus Network Journal, 1(2), 75–85.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

References 2.8

    Online

    References 2.9

    • Khabazi, Z. (2012b). Generative algorithms (using Grasshopper) (p. 7). Digital version published by Morphogenesism.

      Google Scholar 

    • Khan, F. R. (1980b). Structural aesthetics in architecture and its social and technological relevance. In Zeitschrift: IABSE congress report AIPC=IVBH, Kongressbericht November (p. 136).

      Google Scholar 

    • Mentegazzi, E. (2014). In Mentegazzi, E. M. A. (Ed.), Parametricism: The act of change in architecture (p. 17, 38). Department of the Build Enviroment. Eindhoven: AnArchi.

      Google Scholar 

    • Salingaros, N. A. (1999c). Architecture, patterns and mathematics. Nexus Network Journal, 1(2), 75–85.

      Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

    • Toussaint, M. H. (2007). A design tool for timber gridshells (p. 69). MSc Thesis, Delft University of Technology.

      Google Scholar 

    • Wesdijk, M. (2012). Modernism and meaning. In Siegfried Giedion’s interpretation of modernism explained by his ‘new space conception’ (pp. 1–3). Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.

      Google Scholar 

    References 2.10

    • Addington, D. M., & Schodeck, D. L. (2005b). Smart materials and new technologies – For the architecture and design professions. In Materials and architecture 1.1 (p. 12). New York: Architectural Press (imprint of Elsevier).

      Google Scholar 

    • Ackerman, D. (2016, March/April). In three dimensions (p. 25, 27). Johannesburg: Architect & Specificator/Promech.

      Google Scholar 

    • Benedikt, M. (1991). Cyberspace: Some proposals in cyberspace: First steps. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), (pp. 119–224). London: MIT Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Birch, R., & Sinclair B. R. (2013d). Spirituality in place: Building connections between architecture, design, and spiritual experience (pp. 80–81, 86). Alberta: University of Calgary.

      Google Scholar 

    • Challoner, J. (2002). In J. Gribbon (Ed.), Artifical intelligence, Series: DK essential science, a beginners gide to robotics and man-made minds. London: Dorling Kindersley.

      Google Scholar 

    • Daveiga, J., & Ferreira, P. (2005b). Smart and nano materials in architecture. ACADIA05: Smart architecture. Austin: University of Texas.

      Google Scholar 

    • Frazl, P. (2007b). Biomimetic materials research: What can we really learn from nature’s structural materials? Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 637–642. doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.0218.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    • Kushner, M. (2015). The future of architecture in 100 buildings (pp. viii–viix). New York: TED Books, Simon & Schuster.

      Google Scholar 

    • Link, J. (2016, February 11). 5 ways architects are redefining craftsmanship for a postdigital age. Autodesk’s Redshift Publication.

      Google Scholar 

    • Lorenzi, M. G., & Francaviglia, M. F. (2010). Art and mathematics in Antoni Gaudi’s architecture: “La Sagrada Familia”. Journal of Applied Mathematics (Aplimat), 3(1), 128.

      Google Scholar 

    • Magermans, A. (2004). Architecture in cyberspace. In Intelligent Agent 4.3.1. (pp. 1–4).

      Google Scholar 

    • Marques, S. O., & Goulette, J.-P. (2000). Architecture and cyberspace: Reciprocal spatial contamination. In Construction the digital space. 4: SIGraDI, Rio de Janeira (p. 66,67).

      Google Scholar 

    • Mitchell, W. (1995). City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn (p. 105). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Van de Moere, A., Neuckermans, H., & Heylighen, A. (1998). An architectural approach to cyberspace. Belgium: KU Leuven University.

      Google Scholar 

    • Whittle, D. B. (1996). Cyberspace: The human dimension (p. 306). New York: W.H. Freeman.

      Google Scholar 

    Online

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

      Derek Thomas

    Authors
    1. Derek Thomas
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

    About this chapter

    Cite this chapter

    Thomas, D. (2018). Elemental Determinants. In: Masters of the Structural Aesthetic. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5445-7_2

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5445-7_2

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

    • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5444-0

    • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5445-7

    • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation