Advertisement

Innovation–Consolidation Nexus: Evidence from India’s Manufacturing Sector

  • Beena SaraswathyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

Often mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are approved by competition regulator(s) based on the likely impact of it on innovation, which is further expected to enhance consumer welfare. During the initial years of M&As activity, the relationship between M&As and technological performance was not a major concern. During those days, the studies were focusing on the trade-off between efficiency generation and market power creation. However, there has been an unprecedented increase in the value and volume of technology-related mergers, acquisitions and alliances during globalization with a view to minimize cost of production and to effectively withstand market competition. Overall, the study observed that cross-border M&As are spending more for royalties and technical know-how, which indirectly indicates the continuing dependence of foreign firms on import of technology compared to in-house R&D creation in the Indian manufacturing sector.

Keywords

Market structure and innovation Mergers and acquisitions Anti-trust issues Government policy and regulations Monopolization strategies Innovation 

JEL classification

G34 G38 L44 L12 O32 

References

  1. Basant R (1997) Technology strategies of large enterprises in Indian industry: Some explorations. World Dev 25(10):1683–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basanth R (2000) Corporate response to economic reforms. Econ Polit Wkly 35(10):813–822Google Scholar
  3. Beena PL (2000) An analysis of mergers in the private corporate sector in India. Working paper No. 301. Centre for Development Studies, ThiruvananthapuramGoogle Scholar
  4. Beena PL (2004) Towards understanding the merger wave in the Indian corporate sector: a comparative perspective. Working paper No. 355. Centre for Development Studies, ThiruvananthapuramGoogle Scholar
  5. Beena PL (2008) Trends and perspectives on corporate mergers in contemporary India. Econ Polit Wkly 43(39):48–56Google Scholar
  6. Boone J (2008) A new way to measure competition. The Econ J 118(531):1245–1261Google Scholar
  7. Cassiman B, Colombo Massimo G (2008) Mergers and acquisitions: the innovation impact. Edward Elgar, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), Various publicationsGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (2008) Fact sheet on foreign direct investment, New Delhi. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  10. Dessyllas, Hughes (2005) R&D and patenting activity and the propensity to acquire in high technology industries. Working paper No. 298. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhall V (2007) Competition law today: concepts, issues and the law in practice. Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallego BC (2010) Intellectual property rights and competition policy. In: Correa CM (ed). Research handbook on the protection of IPR under WTO rules, vol 1 Edward Elgar, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene W (2003) Econometric analysis. Pearson Education, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene W (2004) Fixed effects and bias due to the incidental parameters problem in the tobit model. Econ Rev 23(2):125–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guellec D, de la Potterie BV (2001) The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Res Policy 30(8)Google Scholar
  16. Hagedoorn J, Duysters G (2000) The effects of mergers and Acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. University of Maastricht, MERIT, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  17. Henningsen A (2010) Estimating censored regression models in R using the censReg package. Available at University of Copenhagen website <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/censReg/vignettes/censReg.pdf>. Accessed on 8 May 2012
  18. Katrak H (1997) Developing countries’ imports of technology, in-house technological capabilities and efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience. J Dev Econ 53(1):67–83Google Scholar
  19. Katz ML, Shelanski HA (2004) Merger policy and innovation: must enforcement change to account for technological change?. Working paper No. 10710. National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleer R (2006) The effect of mergers on the incentive to invest in cost reducing innovation. BGPE discussion paper No. 11, WuerzburgGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar N (2000) Mergers and acquisitions by MNEs: patterns and implications. Econ Polit Wkly 35(32):2851–2858Google Scholar
  22. Kumar N, Siddharthan NS (1997) Technology, market structure and internationalisation: issues and policies for developing countries. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lancaster T (2000) The incidential parameter problem since 1948. J Econ 95:395–413Google Scholar
  24. Manthravadi P, Reddy AV (2007) Relative size in mergers and operating performance: Indian experience. Econ Polit Wkly 42(39):3936–3942Google Scholar
  25. Narula R (2003) Globalisation and technology: Interdependence, innovation systems and industrial policy. Cambridge Polity Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Parameswaran M (2010) International trade and R&D investment: evidence from manufacturing firms in India. Int J Technol Global 5(1–2):43–60Google Scholar
  27. Pillai PM (1979) Technology transfer, adaptation and assimilation. Econ Polit Wkly 14(47):M121–M126Google Scholar
  28. Pradhan JP (2007) Trends and patterns of overseas acquisitions by Indian multinationals. Working paper No. 10. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  29. Ravenscraft DJ, Scherer FM (1987) Mergers, sell-offs and economic efficiency. The Brooking Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Saraswathy B (2015) Production efficiency of firms with mergers and acquisitions in India. Working paper No. 188. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  31. Schulz N (2007) Review of literature on the impact of mergers on innovation. University of Wuerzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  32. Subrahmanian KK (1991) Technological capability under economic liberalism: experience of Indian industry in eighties. Econ Polit Wkly XXVI 35:M87–M89Google Scholar
  33. Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26(1):24–36Google Scholar
  34. Verbeek M (2000) A guide to modern econometrics. Wiley, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Wooldridge JM (2000) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South Western College PublishingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations