Advertisement

Firm Capabilities and Productivity Spillovers from FDI: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms

  • Sanghita MondalEmail author
  • Manoj Pant
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

Using a panel dataset on Indian manufacturing firms from 1994 to 2010, the present paper examines the productivity spillovers from the foreign direct investment (FDI) through various channels of horizontal and vertical linkages. In addition, the study also focuses on the influence of domestic firms’ initial capabilities in absorbing FDI-induced technological benefits. Firm productivity has been measured by using the semi-parametric Levinsohn–Petrin methodology. Using the fixed-effect panel model to estimate spillover models, the initial results show that the productivity growth of Indian firms is adversely affected by various horizontal spillover channels, while the vertical linkages are found insignificant. Interestingly, the second part of the study reveals that only the domestic firms with some initial technological capabilities (proxied by initial three years’ R&D activities), low technology gap with the foreign firms in the initial periods and high complementary capabilities (proxied by initial three years’ average firm size) gain productivity benefits from FDI spillover channels as compared to other firms within the industry. Essentially, the study brings out the importance of domestic firms’ need to encourage internal R&D activities in absorbing technological benefits from foreign presence and their economic activities in the domestic market.

References

  1. Aitken, BJ, Harrison, AE (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. Am Econ Rev 605–618Google Scholar
  2. Barrios S, Strobl E (2002) Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: evidence from the Spanish experience. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 138(3):459–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basant R, Fikkert B (1996) The effects of R&D, foreign technology purchase, and domestic and international spillovers on productivity in Indian firms. Rev Econ Stat 187–199Google Scholar
  4. Beveren, IV (2012) Total factor productivity estimation: a practical review. J Econ Surv 26(1):98–128Google Scholar
  5. Behera SR, Dua P, Goldar B (2012) Foreign direct investment and technology spillover: evidence across Indian Manufacturing Industries. Singap Econ Rev 57(02)Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya M, Jong-Rong C, Pradeep V (2008) Productivity spillover in Indian manufacturing Firms. Discussion paper, 30/08, Monash University, Business and Economics, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Blalock G, Gertler PJ (2005) Foreign direct investment and externalities: the case for public intervention. In: Moran T, Graham E, Blomstrom M (eds) Does foreign direct investment promote development. Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, pp 73–106Google Scholar
  8. Blalock G, Gertler PJ (2008) Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. J Int Econ 74(2):402–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blalock G, Gertler PJ (2009) How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology. J Dev Econ 90(2):192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blalock G, Simon DH (2009) Do all firms benefit equally from downstream FDI? The moderating effect of local suppliers’ capabilities on productivity gains. J Int Bus Stud 40(7):1095–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blomstrom M, Sjoholm F (1999) Technology transfer and spillovers: does local participation with multinationals matter? Eur Econ Rev 43(4):915–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantwell J, Piscitello L (2002) The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: the role of spillovers and local competencies. J Int Manag 8(1):69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caves RE (1974) Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets. Economica 176–193Google Scholar
  14. Chung W, Mitchell W, Yeung B (2003) Foreign direct investment and host country productivity: the American automotive component industry in the 1980s. J Int Bus Stud 34(2):199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 569–596Google Scholar
  16. Crespo N, Fontoura MP (2007) Determinant factors of FDI spillovers–what do we really know? World Dev 35(3):410–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damijan JP, Knell MS, Majcen B, Rojec M (2003) Technology transfer through FDI in Top-10 transition countries: how important are direct effects, horizontal and vertical spillovers? (No. 549). William Davidson Institute at the University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  18. De Loecker J (2007) Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. J Int Econ 73(1):69–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Du L, Harrison A, Jefferson GH (2012) Testing for horizontal and vertical foreign investment spillovers in China, 1998–2007. J Asian Econ 23(3):234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feinberg SE, Majumdar SK (2001) Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. J Int Bus Stud 421–437Google Scholar
  21. Findlay R (1978) Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: a simple dynamic model. Q J Econ 1–16Google Scholar
  22. Franco C, Sasidharan S (2010) MNEs, technological efforts and channels of export spillover: an analysis of Indian manufacturing industries. Econ Syst 34(3):270–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fosfuri A, Motta M, Rønde, T (2001) Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers’ mobility. J Int Econ 53(1):205–222Google Scholar
  24. Globerman S (1979) Foreign direct investment and ‘spillover’ efficiency benefits in Canadian manufacturing industries. Can J Econ 42–56Google Scholar
  25. Görg H, Greenaway D (2004) Much ado about no thing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Res Obs 19(2):171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haddad M, Harrison A (1993) Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. J Dev Econ 42(1):51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haskel JE, Pereira SC, Slaughter MJ (2007) Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms? Rev Econ Stat 89(3):482–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Havranek T, Irsova Z (2011) Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: why results vary and what the true effect is. J Int Econ 85(2):234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Javorcik BS (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am Econ Rev 605–627Google Scholar
  30. Jabbour L, Mucchielli JL (2007) Technology transfer through vertical linkages: the case of the Spanish manufacturing industry. J Appl Econ 10(1):115–136Google Scholar
  31. Kathuria V (2000) Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms. J Int Dev 12(3):343–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kathuria V (2001) Foreign firms, technology transfer and knowledge spillovers to Indian manufacturing firms: a stochastic frontier analysis. Appl Econ 33(5):625–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kathuria V (2002) Liberalisation, FDI, and productivity spillovers—an analysis of Indian manufacturing firms. Oxf Econ Pap 54(4):688–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kathuria V (2010) Does the technology gap influence spillovers? A post-liberalization analysis of Indian manufacturing industries. Oxf Dev Stud 38(2):145–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keller W, Yeaple SR (2003) Multinational enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: firm-level evidence from the United States (No. w9504). National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  36. Kokko A (1994) Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. J Dev Econ 43(2):279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Konings J (2001) The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms. Econ Transit 9(3):619–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kosova R (2010) Do foreign firms crowd out domestic firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Rev Econ Stat 92(4):861–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kugler M (2006) Spillovers from foreign direct investment: within or between industries? J Dev Econ 80(2):444–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lall S (1978) Transnational, domestic enterprises and industrial structure in Host LDCs: a survey. Oxf Econ Pap 30(2):217–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70(2):317–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu Z (2002) Foreign direct investment and technology spillover: evidence from China. J Comp Econ 30(3):579–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Majumdar, SK (1997) The impact of size and age on firm-level performance: some evidence from India. Rev Ind Organ 12(2):231–241Google Scholar
  44. Marin A, Bell M (2007) Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI): the active role of MNC subsidiaries in Argentina in the 1990s. J Dev Stud 42(4):678–697Google Scholar
  45. Marin A, Sasidharan S (2010) Heterogeneous MNC subsidiaries and technological spillovers: explaining positive and negative effects in India. Res Policy 39(9):1227–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Merlevede B, Schoors K (2006) FDI and the consequences towards more complete capture of spillover effects (No. 06/372). Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  48. Parameswaran M (2009) International trade, R&D spillovers and productivity: evidence from Indian manufacturing industry. J Dev Stud 45(8):1249–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Patibandla M, Sanyal A (2005) Foreign investment and productivity: a study of post-reform Indian industry. Rev Appl Econ 1(1):1–14Google Scholar
  50. Perez T (1997) Multinational enterprises and technological spillovers: an evolutionary model. J Evol Econ 7(2):169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poole JP (2013) Knowledge transfers from multinational to domestic firms: evidence from worker mobility. Rev Econ Stat 95(2):393–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sasidharan S, Ramanathan A (2007) Foreign direct investment and spillovers: evidence from Indian manufacturing. Int J Trade Glob Mark 1(1):5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schoors K, Tol B (2002) Foreign direct investment spillovers within and between sectors: evidence from Hungarian data. Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium, 2002/157Google Scholar
  54. Siddharthan NS (2016) Technology, globalisation and multinationals. http://esocialsciences.org/eBook/eBook_Siddharthan.pdf. Accessed 12th March 2017
  55. Siddharthan NS, Lal K (2004) Liberalisation, MNE and productivity of Indian enterprises. Econ Polit Wkly 448–452Google Scholar
  56. Smeets R (2008) Collecting the pieces of the FDI knowledge spillovers puzzle. World Bank Res Obs 23(2):107–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang JY, Blomström M (1992) Foreign investment and technology transfer: a simple model. Eur Econ Rev 36(1):137–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wei Y, Liu X (2006) Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China’s manufacturing sector. J Int Bus Stud 37(4):544–557Google Scholar
  59. Xu B (2000) Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. J Dev Econ 62(2):477–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.P.G.D.A.V College, Univesity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.CITD/SIS/JNUNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations