Advertisement

Analysis of Chronic Disease Processes Based on Cohort and Registry Data

  • Richard J. Cook
  • Jerald F. Lawless
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we review the types of observation schemes which arise in the analysis of data on chronic conditions from individuals in disease registries. We consider the utility of multistate modeling for such disease processes, and deal with both right-censored data and data arising from intermittent observation of individuals. The assumptions necessary to support standard likelihood or partial likelihood inference are highlighted and adaptations to deal with dependent censoring or dependent inspection are described and examined in simulation studies and through application.

References

  1. 1.
    Aalen, O.O., O. Borgan, and H. Fekjaer. 2001. Covariate adjustment of event histories estimated with Markov chains: The additive approach. Biometrics 57: 993–1001.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersen, P.K., O. Borgan, R.D. Gill, and N. Keiding. 1993. Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes. New York: Springer.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen, P.K., J.P. Klein, and S. Rosthoj. 2003. Generalised linear models for correlated pseudo-observations, with applications to multi-state models. Biometrika 90: 15–27.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ayer, M., H.D. Brunk, G.M. Ewing, W.T. Reid, and E. Silverman. 1955. An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete observations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26: 641–647.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barlow, R.E., D.J. Bartholomew, J.M. Bremner, and H.D. Brunk. 1972. Statistical inference under order restrictions: The theory and application of isotonic regression. New York: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, R.J., and J.F. Lawless. 2007. The statistical analysis of recurrent events. Berlin: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook, R.J., J.F. Lawless, L. Lakhal-Chaieb, and K.-A. Lee. 2009. Robust estimation of mean functions and treatment effects for recurrent events under event-dependent censoring and termination: application to skeletal complications in cancer metastatic to bone. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104: 60–75.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Datta, S., and G.A. Satten. 2001. Validity of the Aalen–Johansen estimators of stage occupation probabilities and Nelson–Aalen estimators of integrated transition hazards for non-markov models. Statistics and Probability Letters 55 (4): 403–411.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Datta, S., and G.A. Satten. 2002. Estimation of integrated transition hazards and stage occupation probabilities for non-markov systems under dependent censoring. Biometrics 58: 792–802.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farewell, V.T., J.F. Lawless, D.D. Gladman, and M.B. Urowitz. 2003. Tracing studies and analysis of the effect of loss to follow-up on mortality estimation from patient registry data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C 52: 445–456.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gill, R.D., Van der Laan, M.J. and Robins, J.M. 1997. Coarsening at random: characterizations, conjectures, counter-examples. In Processdings 1st Seattle Sypmposium in Biostatisitcs: Survival Analysis, eds. Lin D.Y and Fleming T.R, 256–294. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hogan, J.W., Roy, J. and Korkontzelou, C. 2004. Handling dropouts in longitudinal studies.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hortobagyi, G.N., R.L. Theriault, A. Lipton, L. Porter, D. Blayney, C. Sinoff, H. Wheeler, J.F. Simeone, J.J. Seaman, R.D. Knight, M. Heffernan, K. Mellars, and D.J. Reitsma. 1998. Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with pamidronate. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology 16: 2038–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackson, C.H. 2011. Multi-state models for panel data: The msm package for R. Journal Statistical Software 38: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalbfleisch, J.D., and J.F. Lawless. 1985. The analysis of panel data under a Markov assumption. Journal of the American Statistical Association 80: 863–871.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalbfleisch, J.D., and R.L. Prentice. 2002. The statistical analysis of failure time data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klein, J.P., and M.L. Moeschberger. 2003. Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lawless, J.F. 2003. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data, 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lawless, J.F., and N. Nazeri Rad. 2015. Estimation and assessment of Markov multistate models with intermittent observations on individuals. Lifetime Data Analysis 21: 160–179.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin, H., D.O. Scharfstein, and R.A. Rosenheck. 2004. Analysis of longitudinal data with irregular, outcome-dependent follow-up. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 66: 791–813.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelsen, R.B. 2006. An introduction to copulas, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Satten, G.A., S. Datta, and J. Robins. 2007. Estimating the marginal survival function in the presence of time dependent covariates. Statistics and Probability Letters 54: 397–403.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scheike, T.H., and M.J. Zhang. 2007. Direct modelling of regression effects for transition probabilities in multistate models. Scandinavian Jorunal of Statistics 34: 17–32.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Der Laan, M.J., and J.M. Robins. 1998. Locally efficient estimation with current status data and time-dependent covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93: 693–701.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations