Abstract
One of the most compelling images of modern science is its apparent ability to unearth the ‘real properties of matter’ from below the chaos encountered in the ‘world of ordinary experiences’. The image supports a common conception of science that science is a harbinger of truth : the realist position. In contrast, there is a minority view in the philosophy of science which says that scientific theories necessarily fail to describe the world. In this context, how do we characterize the purported scientific nature of the contemporary discipline of cognitive science , that includes biolinguistics as a science of language? Given the immense complexity and evolutionary spread of cognitive phenomena, it is unlikely that a genuinely universal scientific theory will be reached in this domain unless some severe constraints are imposed on cognitive theory. In search of possible constraints, the realist aspect of modern science is studied. How does advanced science abstract away from the complexity of experience? Immanuel Kant’s theory of schemata is studied in some detail to show that even if Kant’s innovative suggestions may explain the nature of minimalist art, they fail to account for the minimalism achieved in physics. The realist claims of physics are firmly grounded via mathematical forms that capture simple, periodic regularities of nature. Therefore, if the science of the mind hopes to reach universal generalizations, its empirical domain must be so restricted as to meet the conditions of the Galilean style . The study of language possibly meets those conditions.
Science is a very strange activity. It only works for simple problems. Even in the hard sciences, when you move beyond the simplest structures, it becomes very descriptive.
Noam Chomsky
This is a revised version of an earlier paper published as Mukherji (2009).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The pictures mentioned in this chapter can be seen either in Mukherji (2009), or by downloading an earlier version of this chapter at http://people.du.ac.in/~nmukherji/work.htm, titled ‘Truth, Computation, Intelligibility’ (Item 15 under Language and Mind).
References
Boeckx, C. 2006. Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, S. 2005. Endless Forms Most Beautiful. New York: Norton.
Cartright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. 1991. Linguistics and cognitive science: Problems and mysteries. In The Chomskyan Turn, A. Kasher (Ed.), 26–53. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. 1994. Language and Thought. London: Moyer Bell.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2000. The Architecture of Language. In N. Mukherji, B. Patnaik and R. Agnihotri (Eds.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. 2001. Language and the rest of the world. Bose Memorial Lecture in Philosophy, Delhi University, November 4.
Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. London: Penguin Books.
Descartes, R. 1637/1968. Discourse on Method and The Meditations. Translated by F. Sutcliffe. Suffolk: Penguin.
Hesse, M. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
Hinzen, W. 2006. Mind Design and Minimal Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by N.K. Smith. London: Macmillan.
Mukherji, N. 2009. Truth and intelligibility. In Science, Literature, Aesthetics, Volume XV, A. Dev (Ed.). Part 3 of History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization. New Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations.
Mukherji, N. 2010. The Primacy of Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Osherson, D. 1995. An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. 1998. Foreword. In Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax, by J. Uriagereka. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stewart, I. 1995. Nature’s Numbers: Discovering Order and Pattern in the Universe. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Stewart, I. 2001. What Shape is a Snowflake?. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Weinberg, S. 1976. The forces of nature. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 29: 13–29.
Weinberg, S. 1993. Dreams of a Final Theory. New York: Vintage.
Wilson, R., and F. Keil. 1999. The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mukherji, N. (2017). Science and the Mind. In: Reflections on Human Inquiry. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5364-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5364-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5363-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5364-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)