Advertisement

Statistical Shape Models and Atlases: Application to 2D-3D Reconstruction in THA

  • Guoyan Zheng
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces both a statistically shaped model (SSM)-based surface model reconstruction method and an atlas-based intensity volume reconstruction method under the context of 2D-3D reconstruction-based planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA). It shows that, despite successful application of the SSM-based method for planning cup components to be used during THA, it has limitations regarding planning stem components because of missing information about intramedullary canal geometry. This deficit motivated us to develop an atlas-based intensity volume reconstruction method to derive the patient-specific intensity volume of the proximal femur, which facilitates precise planning of stem components.

Keywords

Statistical shape model Atlas 2D-3D reconstruction THA 

References

  1. 1.
    Gonzalez Della Valle A, et al. The Precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eggli S, Pisan M, Mueller M. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:382–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR. Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:507–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unnanuntana A, Wagner D, Goodman SB. The accuracy of pre-operative templating in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viceconti M, Lattanzi R, et al. CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:371–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sariali E, Mauprivez R, et al. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomized comparison between three-dimensional computerized planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huppertz A, Radmer S, et al. Computed tomography for preoperative planning in minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasty: radiation exposure and cost analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:406–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Otomaru I, Nakamoto M, et al. Automated preoperative planning of femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty from 3D CT data: atlas-based approach and comparative study. Med Image Anal. 2012;16:415–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitton D, Deschenes S, et al. 3D reconstruction of the pelvis from bi-planar radiography. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2006;9:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kadoury S, Cheriet F, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar X-ray images. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:160–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zheng G, Gollmer S, Schumann S, et al. A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images. Med Image Anal. 2009;13:883–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zheng G. Personalized X-ray reconstruction of the proximal femur via intensity- based non-rigid 2D-3D registration. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(2):598–606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schumann S, Liu L, Tannast M, Bergmann M, Nolte L-P, Zheng G. An integrated system for 3D hip joint reconstruction from 2D X-rays: a preliminary validation study. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41:2077–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balestra S. Statistical shape model-based articulated 2D-3D reconstruction. Master thesis, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, 2013.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schumann S, Sato Y, Nakanishi Y, Yokota F, Takao M, Sugano S, Zheng G. Cup implant planning based on 2-D/3-D radiographic pelvis reconstruction - first clinical results. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:2665–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu W, Chu C, Tannast M, Zheng G. Fully automatic reconstruction of personalized 3D volumes of the proximal femur from 2D X-ray images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11:1673–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Surgical Technology and BiomechanicsUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations