The 2008–2009 crisis generated much criticism concerning the efficacy of policies favouring global markets and multinational business. Economic patriotism became widespread, and Hungary has been active in implementing corresponding new policies. This chapter analyses these steps from a theoretical viewpoint and also shows the immediate (mostly negative) impacts on the economy and institutions. The application of selective advantage and disadvantage measures were aimed not only at the improvement of selected Hungarian firms’ competitive positions against multinational business, but also tried to split the concerted actions of the latter business segment. Some of the negatively affected firms sold their Hungarian branches, but most of them remained albeit they reduced activity. The selective disadvantage measures (taxes and levies on selected foreign firms, unfavourable changes in regulation) caused significant changes in market structure, but they also triggered EU competition procedures. Most harmful was the negative impact on market institutions, the decline of the rule of law in the country. The discussion is wrapped up with suggestions as to how the perceived problems with multinational business could be managed with market conforming policy tools.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Antalóczy, K., Sass, M., & Szanyi, M. (2011). Policies for attracting foreign direct investment and enhancing its spillovers to endogenous firms: The case of Hungary. In E. Rugraff & M. W. Hansen (Eds.), Multinational corporations and Local Firms in Emerging Economies (pp. 181–210). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1996). A theory of privatization. Economic Journal, 106, 309–319.
Clift, B., & Woll, C. (2012). Economic patriotism: Reinventing control over open markets. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 307–323.
Drahokoupil, J. (2008). Who won the contest for a new property class? Structural transformation of elites in the Visegrád Four region. Journal for East European Management Studies, 13, 360–377.
Drahokoupil, J., Van Apeldorn, B., & Horn, L. (2008). Introduction: Towards a critical political economy of European governance. In J. Drahokoupil, B. Van Apeldorn, & L. Horn (Eds.), Contradictions and limits of neoliberal European Governance: From Lisbon to Lisbon (pp. 1–17). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Frydman, R., & Rapaczynski, A. (1994). Privatization in Eastern Europe: Is the state withering away? Budapest: Central European University Press.
Helleiner, E., & Pickel, A. (Eds.). (2005). Economic nationalism in a globalizing world. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hungarian Government. (2009). J/8582. jelentés az ÁPV Zrt. és jogelődei – mint a privatizáció lebonyolítására létrehozott célszervezetek – tevékenységéről és a teljes privatizációs folyamatról (1990–2007) (Report No. 8582 about the activity of State Asset Holding Plc. and its predecessors – as special organizations to carry out privatization – and the complete privatization process, 1990–2007). Budapest.
Iwasaki, I., & Tokunaga, M. (2014). Macroeconomic impacts of FDI in transition economies: A meta-analysis. World Development, 61, 53–69.
Kalotay, K., & Sass, M. (2012, October 18). Inward FDI in Hungary and its policy context. Columbia FDI Profiles. Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.
Laki, M. (2002). A nagyvállalkozók tulajdonszerzési esélyeiről a szocializmus után (About chances of obtaining property by entrepreneurs after socialism). Közgazdasági Szemle, 49, 45–58.
Laki, M., Szalai, J. (2013). Tíz évvel később – a magyar nagyvállalkozók európai környezetben (Ten years after: Hungarian entrepreneurs in European environment). Budapest: Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány.
Levy, J. (Ed.). (2006). The state after statism: New state activities in the age of liberalization. Oxford: Harvard University Press.
McDermott, G. A. (2002). Embedded politics: Industrial networks and institutional change in post-communism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mihályi, P. (2015). A privatizált vagyon visszaállamosítása Magyarországon 2010–2014 (Re-nationalization of privatized property in Hungary 2010–2014) (Discussion Paper No. 2015/7). Budapest: Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Naczyk, M. (2014). Budapest in Warsaw: Central European business elites and the rise of economic patriotism since the crisis. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2550496
Nölke, A., & Vliegenhart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61, 670–702.
Rapaczynski, A. (1996). The roles of state property and the market in establishing property rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 87–103.
Schoenman, R. (2014). Networks and Institutions in Europe’s Emerging Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stark, D. (1996). Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 492–504.
Stark, D., & Bruszt, L. (1998). Postsocialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stark, D., & Vedres, B. (2012). Political holes in the economy: The business network of partisan firms in Hungary. American Sociological Review, 77, 700–722.
Szanyi, M. (1996). Adaptive steps by Hungary’s industries during the transition crisis. Eastern European Economics, 34, 59–77.
Szanyi, M. (2002). Spillover effects and business linkages of foreign-owned firms in Hungary (Working Paper No. 126). Budapest: Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Szanyi, M. (2016). The reversal of the privatization logic in Central European transition economies. Acta Oeconomica, 66, 33–55.
Szentes, T. (Ed.). (2005–2006). Fejlődés, versenyképesség, globalizáció (Development, competitiveness, globalization). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Transparency International Hungary. (2014). Lifting the lid on lobbying: Strategic partnership agreements in an uncertain business and regulatory environment (National Report of Hungary). Budapest: Transparency International Hungary.
Yakovlev, A. (2006). The evolution of business-state interaction in Russia: From state capture to business capture? Europe-Asia Studies, 58, 1033–1056.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szanyi, M. (2017). Impacts of the Crisis on the FDI-Led Development Model in Hungary: Emergence of Economic Patriotism or Shift from the Competition State to Patronage?. In: Havlik, P., Iwasaki, I. (eds) Economics of European Crises and Emerging Markets. Palgrave, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5233-0_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5232-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5233-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)