Advertisement

Discrete Heuristics

Digital Design and Fabrication Through Shapes and Material Computation
  • Diego PinochetEmail author
Conference paper
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 724)

Abstract

In the case of designers, architects and arts, tools are part of a repertoire of cognitive, symbolic, and semiotic artifacts
with which each explores and learn about design problems. Nonetheless, when using digital fabrication tools, a dichotomy between what is ideated and what is made appears as an evident problem since many of the perceptual aspects of sensing and thinking about new things in the making are neglected. It is argued that this establishes a dichotomy between what is ideated and what is executed as an outcome from that idea. How designers can think, learn and augment their creativity by using digital tools in a more relational, exploratory, interactive and creative way? Furthermore, how can we teach design using contemporary fabrication tools beyond its representational capabilities? This paper explores the richness of using digital fabrication tools through the lens of shapes grammars as a design paradigm in order to extend computational making including digital fabrication tools, gestures and material behavior as crucial actors of the design process. Through the use of discrete heuristics - that is, the elaboration of deictic rules for computation with physical objects, materials and fabrication tools in a precise yet perceptual way- this paper shows experiments inside a third year design studio to overcome the hylomorphism present in the digital design and make dichotomy.

Keywords

Digital fabrication Computational making Human computer interaction Shape grammars 

References

  1. 1.
    Flusser, V.: Gestures (Roth, N.A., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perez-Gómez, A.: The historical context of contemporary architectural representation. In: Ayres, P. (ed.) Persistent Modelling: Extending the Role of Architectural Representation, pp. 13–25. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinochet, D.I.: Making gestures: design and fabrication through real time human computer interaction (Master of Science Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinochet, D.: Making - gestures: continuous design through real time human machine interaction. In: 21st CAADRIA Conference Proceedings, Melbourne, pp. 282–290 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gürsoy, B., Özkar, M.: Visualizing making in design: shapes, materials and actions. Des. Stud. 41, 29–50 (2015). ISSN: 0142-694X Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodman, N.: Languages of Art, 2nd edn. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis (1976)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dreyfus, H.L.: What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason, 1st edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Radman, Z. (ed.): The Hand, An Organ of the Mind: What the Manual Tells the Mental. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malafouris, L.: How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knight, T., Vardouli, T.: Computational making. Des. Stud. 41, 1–7 (2015). ISSN: 0142-694XGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knight, T., Stiny, G.: Making grammars: from computing with shapes to computing with things. Des. Stud. 41, 8–28 (2015). ISSN: 0142-694XGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ihde, D.: Bodies in Technology. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Latour, B.: On technical mediation - philosophy. Sociol. Geneal. Common Knowl. 3(2), 29–64 (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clark, A.: Natural-born cyborgs: minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schön, D.A.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ackermann, E.: Constructing knowledge and transforming the world. In: Tokoro, M., Steels, L. (eds.) A Learning Zone of One’s Own: Sharing Representations and Flow in Collaborative Learning Environments, pp. 15–37. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robinson, D.: Feeling Extended: Sociality as Extended Body-Becoming-Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Visser, W.: The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark, A.: Being There Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ingold, T.: Bringing things back to life: creative entanglements in a world of materials (working paper). Realities/Morgan Centre, University of Manchester (2008). http://www.manchester.ac.uk/realities/publications/workingpapers/. Accessed
  22. 22.
    Nakamura, F.: Creating or performing words? observations on contemporary calligraphy. In: Hallam, E., Ingold, T. (eds.) Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Bloomsbury Academic, New York (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of DesignAdolfo Ibañez UniversitySantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations