Skip to main content

Degradation Test Plan for a Nonlinear Random-Coefficients Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistical Modeling for Degradation Data

Part of the book series: ICSA Book Series in Statistics ((ICSABSS))

  • 1567 Accesses

Abstract

Sample size and inspection schedule are essential components in degradation test plan. In practice, an experimenter is required to determine a certain level of trade-off between total resources and precision of the degradation test. This paper develops a design of cost-efficient degradation test plan in the context of a nonlinear random-coefficients model, while satisfying precision constraints for the failure-time distribution derived from the degradation testing data. The test plan introduces a precision metric to identify the information losses due to reduction of test resources, based on the cost function to balance the test plan. In order to determine a cost-efficient inspection schedule, a hybrid genetic algorithm is used to solve a cost optimization problem under test precision constraints. The proposed method is applied to degradation data of plasma display panels (PDPs). Finally, sensitivity analysis is provided to show the robustness of the proposed test plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bae SJ, Kvam PH (2004) A nonlinear random-coefficients model for degradation testing. Technometrics 46:460–469

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bae SJ, Kim S-J, Kim MS, Lee BJ, Kang CW (2008) Degradation analysis of nano-contamination in plasma display panels. IEEE Trans Reliab 57:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1992) NONMEM user’s guide. University of California, NONMEM Project Group, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boulanger M, Escobar LA (1994) Experimental design for a class of accelerated degradation tests. Technometrics 36:260–272

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Delyon B, Lavielle M, Moulines E (1999) Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the EM algorithm. Ann Stat 27:94–128

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ermakov SM, Melas VB (1995) Design and analysis of simulation experiments. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim S-J, Bae SJ (2013) Cost-effective degradation test plan for a nonlinear random-coefficients model. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 110:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn E, Lavielle M (2005) Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models. Comput Stat Data Ann 49:1020–1038

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM (1990) Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 46:673–687

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu CJ, Meeker WQ (1993) Using degradation measures to estimate a time-to-failure distribution. Technometrics 35:161–174

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu CJ, Meeker WQ, Escobar LA (1996) A comparison of degradation and failure-time analysis methods for estimating a time-to-failure distribution. Stat Sin 6:531–546

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Matis J, Wehrly T (1979) Stochastic models of compartmental systems. Biometrics 35:199–220

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Metzler CM (1971) Usefulness of the two-compartment open model in pharmacokinetics. J Am Stat Assoc 66:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marseguerra M, Zio E, Cipollone M (2003) Designing optimal degradation tests via multi-objective genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 79:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mentre F, Mallet A, Baccar D (1997) Optimal design in random-effects regression models. Biometrika 84:429–442

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Park JI, Baek SH, Jeong MK, Bae SJ (2009) Dual features functional support vector machines for fault detection of rechargeable batteries. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 39:480–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park JI, Bae SJ (2010) Direct prediction methods on lifetime distribution of organic light-emitting diodes from accelerated degradation tests. IEEE Trans Reliab 59:74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheiner LB, Rosenberg B, Melmon KL (1972) Modelling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage. Comput Biomed Res 5:441–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tseng ST, Wen ZC (2000) Step-stress accelerated degradation analysis for highly reliable products. J Qual Technol 32:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu SJ, Shao J (1999) Reliability analysis using the least squares method in nonlinear mixed-effect degradation. Stat Sin 9:855–877

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu SJ, Chang C (2002) Optimal design of degradation tests in presence of cost constraint. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 76:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu SM, Xie M (2007) Classifying weak, and strong components using ROC analysis with application to burn-in. IEEE Trans Reliab 3:552–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yen J, Liao JC, Lee B, Randolph D (1998) A hybrid approach to modeling metabolic systems using a genetic algorithm and simplex method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 28:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu HF, Tseng ST (1998) On-line procedure for terminating an accelerated degradation test. Stat Sin 8:207–220

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu HF, Tseng ST (1999) Designing a degradation experiment. Nav Res Log 46:689–706

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu HF, Tseng ST (2004) Designing a degradation experiment with a reciprocal Weibull degradation rate. Qual Technol Quant M 1:47–63

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk Joo Bae .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, SJ., Bae, S.J. (2017). Degradation Test Plan for a Nonlinear Random-Coefficients Model. In: Chen, DG., Lio, Y., Ng, H., Tsai, TR. (eds) Statistical Modeling for Degradation Data. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5194-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics