Abstract
It is not uncommon for teachers to be required to teach new content due to curriculum changes or shifts in teaching assignments. The former is particularly the case for science teachers because of the advancement in science. However, there is little research on how experienced teachers may develop the requisite knowledge for teaching new topics that they have never taught before. Hence, we explored how six experienced biology teachers prepared for and enacted their first-time teaching of a new topic, polymerase chain reaction, in the context of a curriculum change. Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) was used as the lens to examine the teachers’ development of topic-specific knowledge. In this chapter, we aim (1) to illustrate how new PCK development can be facilitated by a teacher’s disposition to enact two pedagogical moves, namely, conducting subject matter analysis and assessing students formatively, and (2) to characterise the instances in which the teachers invented new instructional strategies/representations during the interactive phase of the lesson (i.e. on-site PCK development). The mechanism of on-site PCK development as a three-step process is also proposed. Implications on teacher professional development arising from the findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abell SK (2008) Twenty years later: does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? Int J Sci Educ 30(10):1405–1416
Bertram A, Loughran J (2012) Science teachers’ views on CoRes and PaP-eRs as a framework for articulating and developing pedagogical content knowledge. Res Sci Educ 42(6):1027–1047
Chan KKH, Yung BHW (2015) On-site pedagogical content knowledge development. Int J Sci Educ 37(8):1246–1278
Chan KKH, Yung BHW (in press) Developing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic: more than teaching experience and subject matter knowledge. Res Sci Educ
Clermont C, Borko H, Krajcik J (1994) Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators. J Res Sci Teach 31(4):419–441
Davis EA, Petish D, Smithey J (2006) Challenges new science teachers face. Rev Educ Res 76(4):607–651
de Jong O, van Driel JH (2004) Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry topics. Int J Sci Math Educ 2(4):477–491
de Jong O, van Driel JH, Verloop N (2005) Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. J Res Sci Teach 42(8):947–964
Erickson F (1985) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock MC (ed) Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edn. MacMillan Press, New York, pp 119–161
Finlayson H, Lock R, Soares A, Tebbutt M (1998) Are we producing teaching technicians or science educators? The consequences of differential demands on trainee science teachers. Educ Rev 50(1):45–54
Geddis AN, Onslow B, Beynon C, Oesch J (1993) Transforming content knowledge: learning to teach about isotopes. Sci Educ 77(6):575–591
Gess-Newsome J (2015) A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In: Berry A, Friedrichsen PJ, Loughran J (eds) Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. Routledge, New York, pp 28–42
Gess-Newsome J, Taylor JA, Carlson J, Gardner AL, Wilson CD, Stuhlsatz MA (in press) Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. Int J Sci Educ
Gotwals AW, Birmingham D (2016) Eliciting, identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Res Sci Educ 46(3):365–388
Hashweh MZ (2005) Teacher pedagogical constructions: a reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teach Teach Theory Pract 11(3):273–292
Hume A, Berry A (2011) Constructing CoRes—a strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Res Sci Educ 41(3):341–355
Lee E, Brown MN, Luft JA, Roehrig GH (2007) Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: pilot year results. Sch Sci Math 107(2):52–60
Loughran J, Berry A, Mulhall P (2006) Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam
Magnusson S, Krajcik J, Borko H (1999) Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In: Gess-Newsome J, Lederman NG (eds) Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 95–132
Marks R (1990) Pedagogical content knowledge: from a mathematical case to a modified conception. J Teach Educ 41(3):3–11
McDuffie A (2004) Mathematics teaching as a deliberate practice: an investigation of elementary pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking during student teaching. J Math Teach Educ 7(1):33–61
McNicholl J, Childs A, Burn K (2013) School subject departments as sites for science teachers learning pedagogical content knowledge. Teach Dev 17(2):155–175
Merriam SB (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Nilsson P (2008) Teaching for understanding: the complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. Int J Sci Educ 30(10):1281–1299
Park S, Chen YC (2012) Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): examples from high school biology classrooms. J Res Sci Teach 49(7):922–941
Park S, Oliver J (2008a) National Board Certification (NBC) as a catalyst for teachers’ learning about teaching: the effects of the NBC process on candidate teachers’ PCK development. J Res Sci Teach 45(7):812–834
Park S, Oliver J (2008b) Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Res Sci Educ 38(3):261–284
Rowland T, Huckstep P, Thwaites A (2005) Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: the knowledge quartet and the case of naomi. J Math Teach Educ 8(3):255–281
Sanders LR, Borko H, Lockard JD (1993) Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. J Res Sci Teach 30(7):723–736
Schneider RM, Plasman K (2011) Science teacher learning progressions. Rev Educ Res 81(4):530–565
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
Schön DA (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 15(2):4–14
Shulman LS (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 57(1):1–22
Turner F, Rowland T (2011) The knowledge quartet as an organising framework for developing and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. In: Rowland T, Ruthven K (eds) Mathematical knowledge in teaching, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–212
van Driel JH, Verloop N, de Vos W (1998) Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. J Res Sci Teach 35(6):673–695
van Driel JH, de Jong O, Verloop N (2002) The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Sci Educ 86(4):572–590
van Driel JH, Berry A, Meirink JA (2014) Research on science teacher knowledge. In: Lederman NG, Abell SK (eds) Handbook of research on science education, vol 2. Routledge, New York, pp 848–870
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Teacher | Brandon | |||
Lesson | Lesson 2 | |||
Theme | (2) Primers and annealing of primers | |||
Vignette | B. The function of primers II | |||
Analysis | ||||
What did the teacher do? | Data sources | |||
In the second lesson, the teacher used an analogy he invented on the spot of the lesson to explain the functions of primers (i.e. to provide a starting site for the synthesis of DNA), when revisiting the important concepts taught in the first lesson. | Observation | |||
Field notes | ||||
Lesson transcript | ||||
Pre-lesson interview | ||||
Post-lesson interview | ||||
Stimulated recall interview | ||||
Description of student-teacher interaction | ||||
B: | Primer acts like an initiation point. When its position is recognised by the DNA polymerase, it starts (the DNA synthesis). In the athletic meet, do you know where you should start running for the 100 m race in the field track? | |||
Ss: | Inaudible | |||
B: | Where should you start running for the 200 m race? | |||
Ss: | Inaudible | |||
B: | How about running for the 400 m race? Do you also know that? For 1500 m race, where should you start running? It is easier to locate the (starting) position for 100 m race and 200 m race. How about that for 1500 m race? | |||
S1: | At the position for 200 m race. | |||
B: | Is it really that 1500 m race starts at the position line for 200 m race? | |||
Ss: | Inaudible | |||
B: | Where should it be? It should be near the position for 300 m race. How do you know that you’re standing at (the starting position for) 300 m race. Actually, what do you rely on (to know the starting position)? | |||
S2: | Someone would tell you! | |||
B: | Besides that, there is a track judge. Primer is a chemical substance. It is actually some short DNA fragment. It would anneal to the (DNA) template. Then, the DNA polymerase and the following nucleotides for making the (new) DNA would recognise that point as the starting point and “line up” there. | |||
…. | ||||
B: | After the DNA has separated into two strands, what would happen? The process is called primer annealing. The primers would anneal to a specific location (of the DNA to be amplified). It is like the track judge. Depending on whether you go for 100 m race, 200 m race or 1500 m race, the track judge would lead you to the specific location (in the field track)(Lesson Transcript #2). | |||
PCK components integrated in the episode | Data sources | |||
Knowledge of Students | Knowledge of instructional strategies | Knowledge of assessment | Knowledge of curriculum | Observation |
Field notes | ||||
Lesson transcript | ||||
✓ | ✓ | Pre-lesson interview | ||
Post-lesson interview | ||||
Stimulated recall interview |
Evidence of the presence of PCK components identified in the episode | Data sources |
---|---|
The concepts about primer are a bit more difficult. They don’t know what a primer is. I think the ideas about primer are the more problematic part (Post-lesson interview #1) (knowledge of students) | |
I thought I was not teaching the ideas about primers well yesterday. The primers provide a starting point (for the DNA polymerase to start DNA synthesis). What is the meaning of a starting point? Different primers provide different starting points (along the DNA to be amplified). I, then, thought about how to express the ideas at that moment. … The competition (analogy) was just off my head. … At that moment, I think they were confused. Primer is a DNA fragment that anneals to the DNA. When annealed, the DNA polymerase and nucleotides would start to work (on DNA synthesis). … The analogy was used to make the ideas concrete. … I really didn’t think about this (confusion) yesterday as I had taught them this (idea) yesterday (in the lesson) (Post-lesson interview #2) (knowledge of instructional strategies, knowledge of students) | Post-lesson interviewsStimulated recall interview |
I felt that they were not able to follow (the ideas I was teaching) from their facial expression. … Then, I started to think about how to make the ideas easier. Many students studied PE (physical education). … When they (students) have field events, they know where the starting position for the 100 m, 200 m and 400 m sprints is (in the field, respectively). So, I used this analogy to talk about the concepts (Stimulated recall interview) (knowledge of instructional strategies) | |
I just observed their faces. … At that interaction, I think they don’t seem to understand (the idea about the primers). The concept is about recognising the location (by the DNA polymerase) and that the DNA strand extends from that position. … I thought about their daily life experiences. At that moment, I thought that running may be related to this idea. I think that running is something that they have experienced (Stimulated recall interview) (knowledge of instructional strategies, knowledge of students) |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chan, K.K.H., Yung, B.H.W. (2018). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development in Experienced Biology Teachers in Their First Attempts at Teaching a New Topic. In: Yeo, J., Teo, T., Tang, KS. (eds) Science Education Research and Practice in Asia-Pacific and Beyond. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5149-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5149-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5148-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5149-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)