Abstract
In Canada, health care decision-making and priority setting are decentralized and occur at various levels in the health care system. Most reimbursement coverage decisions for market-approved medical devices in Canada are done in hospitals within constraints of their annual budget. Canadian HTA bodies exist at the national, provincial, and regional/hospital levels to reflect the decentralized decision making structure. HTAs are conducted for a small number of new medical devices entering the market. HTA organizations in Canada are faced with several limited number of new medical devices entering the market. The pan-Canadian Health Technology Assessment Collaborative was formed in 2011 to share best practices, mitigate the risk of duplication of effort through information sharing, and to identify and participate in joint initiatives in the HTAs of medical devices, procedures and diagnostics. HTA organizations in Canada are faced with numerous challenges. They include, but are not limited to, costly health technologies entering the market at a fast pace, while health care budgets experience pressures given a number of factors, such as economic down turn, aging population, and increasing consumer demand.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
1. Infoplease. (2017). Canada: Facts & Figures. http://www.infoplease.com/country/canada.html
2. Statistics Canada. (2016). Canada’s population estimates, first quarter 2016. Statistics Canada, Ottawa. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/160616/dq160616b-eng.htm
3. Husereau D, Arshoff L, Bhimani S et al. (2015). Medical device and diagnostic pricing and reimbursement in Canada. 1st ed. The Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton
4. Health Canada. (2007). Safe medical devices in Canada. Health Canada, Ottawa. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/activit/fs-fi/meddevfs_matmedfd-eng.php
5. Health Canada. (2012). Canada’s health care system. Government of Canada, Ottawa. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/system-regime/2011-hcs-sss/index-eng.php
6. Martin J, Polisena J, Dendukuri N et al. (2016). Local health technology assessment in Canada: current state and next steps. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 32(3): 175-80
7. Roehrig C, Kargus K. (2003). Health technology assessment in Canada and the G-7 countries: a comparative analysis of the role of HTA agencies in the decision-making process. Health Canada, Government of Canada, Ottawa. (Health care system division working paper). http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/delivery-prestation/hta-ets-eng.php
8. Battista RN, Cote B, Hodge MJ et al. (2009). Health technology assessment in Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25(Suppl 1): 53-60
9. Menon D, Stafinski T. (2009). Health technology assessment in Canada: 20 years strong? Value Health 12(Suppl 2): S14-S19
10. (2015). Pan-Canadian HTA Collaborative - phase II. CADTH, Ottawa
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Polisena, J. (2018). Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices: The Canadian Experience. In: Eskola, H., Väisänen, O., Viik, J., Hyttinen, J. (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC NBC 2017 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_236
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_236
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5121-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5122-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)