Public Perceptions of Nuclear Energy in Asia After Fukushima Crisis

  • Kapil PatilEmail author


The March 2011 nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in Japan affected both public opinion and government policies related to nuclear energy in many countries around the world. Especially in Asia, the crisis caused a widespread uncertainty over ambitious targets for the expansion of nuclear energy, aimed at meeting the twin challenge of energy security and climate change. Notwithstanding the strong public sentiment in the immediate aftermath of the crisis, the degree of public opposition to nuclear energy varied significantly from country to country. In this chapter, we mainly document the trends in public perceptions of nuclear energy after the Fukushima crisis in the Asian region. The study has focussed on understanding shifts in public perceptions of nuclear energy based on survey of media reports, analyses and public polls conducted in the years before and after the Fukushima crisis. The analysis primarily reveals slow recovery in public acceptance of nuclear energy in several Asian countries after the widespread initial loss of faith in safety of nuclear installations due to Fukushima accident. The concerns over nuclear safety, nevertheless, remain the key determinant in peoples’ perceptions of risk towards nuclear energy. The declined public support has so far had only limited impact on government policies for nuclear energy development in Asia, and its growth will be unabated in the years ahead.


  1. Adam, B., Beck, U., & van Loon, J. (2000). The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (Vol. 3, pp. 211–230). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Asian Development Bank. (2013). Energy outlook for Asia and the Pacific. October 2013.
  3. BBC News. (2011). Nuclear power ‘gets little public support worldwide’ by Richard Black, November 25, 2011.
  4. Bird, W. (2012). Anti-nuclear movement growing in Asia. Christian Science Monitor, January 27, 2012.
  5. Bupp, I. C. (1987). Chernobyl’s fallout: The future of nuclear power. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge Energy Research Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Clery, D. (2005). Nuclear industry dares to dream of a New Dawn. Science, 309(5738), 1172–1175. Retrieved from
  7. Costa-Font, J., Rudisill, C., & Mossialos, E. (2008). Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and “political anchoring”: The case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 28(5), 1273–1288. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01094.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalton, T., & Cha, M. (2016). South Korea’s nuclear energy future. The Diplomat, February 23, 2016.
  9. Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302–339. doi: 10.1177/0013916596283003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Digges, C. (2011). Belgium plans conditional nuclear phase out, joining other European nations that are deserting nuclear power. Bellona. November 7, 2011.
  11. Eiser, J. R., Spears, R., & Webley, P. (1989). Nuclear attitudes before and after chernobyl: Change and judgment1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(8), 689–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00348.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eurobarometer. (2010). Europeans and Nuclear Safety Report. Survey Co-Ordinated By Directorate General Communication.
  13. European Commission. (2007). Special Eurobarometer. Europeans and Nuclear Safety Report, /271/Wave 66.2–TNS Opinion & Social. Available at:
  14. Fackler, M. (2011). Japan scraps plan to build new reactors; Prime minister shelves reactor plans and vows new focus on renewables. International Herald Tribune. May 11, 2011.
  15. Fu, W. (2011). Nuclear fallout. Global Times, March 15, 2011. Accessed August 23, 2016.
  16. Gallup, G. (1976). Most See Need for Nuclear Power, But Many Concerned About Safety. Chicago: Field Newspaper Syndicate. July 22, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. Glaser, A. (2012). From Brokdorf to Fukushima: The long journey to nuclear phase-out. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(6), 10–21. doi: 10.1177/0096340212464357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Global Public Opinion on Nuclear Issues and the IAEA, Final Report from 18 Countries Prepared for The International Atomic Energy Agency by GlobeScan Incorporated October 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Grove-White, R., Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P., & Wynne, B. (2006). Nuclear futures: Assessing public attitudes to new nuclear power. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 238–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00766.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, L., & Associates. (1975). A Survey of public and leadership attitudes toward nuclear power development in the United States. New York: Ebasco Services.Google Scholar
  21. Hu, C., & Woite, G. (1993). Nuclear power development in Asia. IAEA Bulletin, 4/1993.
  22. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2011). International Status and Prospects of Nuclear Power (2010 Edition). March 2011.
  23. Irwin, A., Allan, S. & Welsh, I. (2000). Nuclear risks: Three problematics. In: B. Adam, U. Beck & J. van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 79–104). London: Sage Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446219539.n4.
  24. Jenning, R. (2016). Taiwan nuclear power shutdown ‘looks unsustainable’. Nikkaei Asian Review. July 30, 2016., Accessed August 21, 2016.
  25. Joppke, C. (1991). Social movements during cycles of issue attention: The decline of the anti-nuclear energy movements in West Germany and the USA. The British Journal of Sociology, 42(1), 43–60. doi: 10.2307/590834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khattak, M. A., Arifb, A. A., Hannanc, A., Syukrid, F., & Hamid, H. (2016). Design and planning of a nuclear power plant in Malaysia: A feasibility report. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 3(1), 67–76.Google Scholar
  27. Knight, R. (2005). What the polls tell us. Nuclear Engineering International, April 1: 24–5.Google Scholar
  28. Knight, R. (2009). Public attitudes to the nuclear industry. London: Ipsos MORI.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, M., Park, D., & Saunders, H. (2014). Asia’s Energy Adequacy, Environmental Sustainability, and Affordability: An Overview, Asian Development Bank, No. 398, June 2014.
  30. Ming, Z., Yingxin, L., Shaojie, O., Hui, S., & Chunxue, L. (2016). Nuclear energy in the Post-Fukushima Era: Research on the developments of the Chinese and worldwide nuclear power industries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nuclear Energy Institute. (2012). Global Poll Shows Nuclear Support Increasing After Fukushima. October 17, 2012.
  32. O’Donnell, J. K. (2013), Nuclear Power in South Korea’s Green Growth Strategy: Green Growth Quarterly Update III-2013, Council for Foreign Relations. June 2013.
  33. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2010). Public attitudes to nuclear power. NEA No. 6859. Paris: NEA.Google Scholar
  34. OECD/IEA. (2015). India Outlook Energy–World Energy Outlook Special Report.
  35. Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I., & Poortinga, W. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 69–85. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poortinga, W., Aoyagi, M., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2013). Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident: A comparison between Britain and Japan. Energy Policy, 62, 1204–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramana, M. V. (2011). Nuclear power and the public. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(4), 43–51. doi: 10.1177/0096340211413358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosa, E. A. (2005). Déjà Vu all over again for nuclear power? Science, 310(5748), 619. Retrieved from
  39. Rosa, E. A., Matsuda, N., & Kleinhesselink, R. R. (2000). The cognitive architecture of risk: Pan-cultural unity or cultural shaping? In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Cross-cultural risk perception (pp. 187–207). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. Sethi, M. (2012). Future of nuclear power in India. Claws Journal. Summer 2012.
  41. Sjoberg, L. (2001). Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis, 21(1), 189–198. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.211101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science 236(17 April), 280–285.Google Scholar
  43. Slovic, P., Flynn, J. H., & Layman, M. (1991). Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science, 254(5038), 1603–1607. Retrieved from
  44. Slovic, P., Flynn, J., Mertz, C. K., Poumadère, M., & Mays, C. (2000). Nuclear power and the public: A comparative study of risk perception in France and the United States. In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Crosscultural risk perception (pp. 55–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, S. A. (2012). Anti-nuclear sentiment and Japan’s energy choices. Council for Foreign Relations. April 12, 2016.
  46. Tabuchi, H. (2011). Japan Premier Wants Shift Away From Nuclear Power. New York Times, July 13, 2011.
  47. Van Der Pligt, J., Eiser, J. R., & Spears, R. (1986). Attitudes toward nuclear energy: Familiarity and salience. Environment and Behavior, 18(1), 75–93. doi: 10.1177/0013916586181004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verplanken, B. (1989). Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions toward nuclear energy before and after chernobyl in a longitudinal within-subjects design. Environment and Behavior, 21(4), 371–392. doi: 10.1177/0013916589214001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vivoda, V. (2013). After Fukushima: The future of nuclear power in Asia. Internet:
  50. Von Hippel, F. N. (2011). The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(5), 27–36.Google Scholar
  51. Xinhua. (2011). China suspends approvals for new nuclear plants. March 16, 2011.
  52. Wang, Q., & Chen, X. (2012). Regulatory failures for nuclear safety—the bad example of Japan—implication for the rest of world. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2610–2617. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 29(3), 425–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Winning, D. (2010). China’s coal crisis. Wall Street Journal. November 16, 2010.
  55. World Nuclear Association. (2016). Asia’s Nuclear Energy Growth. Last Updated January 2016.
  56. World Nuclear News (2016a) Fifth Japanese power reactor restarted. August 12, 2016.
  57. World Nuclear News. (2016b). Nuclear growth revealed in China’s new Five-Year Plan. March 23, 2016.
  58. York, J. (2013). The Future of Nuclear Power in South Korea after Fukushima. E-International Relations. April 11, 2013. Accessed September 02, 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Pugwash SocietyNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations