Advertisement

A Cognitive Approach to Design of Habitats in Extraterrestrial Environments: Review of Literature

  • Biswaksen PatnaikEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

A desire to explore space coupled with an advancing technology has made mankind undertake longer space missions. The confined, isolated, extreme (ICE) environments in the extraterrestrial atmosphere not only affect human performance but also pose adverse effects to emotional and psychological health. Such spaces greatly affect human behavior, productivity and inter-group relationship. With the advent of long duration extraterrestrial travel, the internal environment of the habitat will be of greater importance as compared to short-term missions. This paper describes the effects of ICE environments and various methodologies to cope with them. Cognitive approaches to the design of habitable surroundings have been considered by incorporating various simple yet powerful elements of design such as art, color, shape and form and visual aesthetics. Based on these elements various mitigation strategies, which also include various forms of stress countermeasures, to avoid sensory deprivation and psychological challenges have been portrayed. Various novel strategies such as incorporation of space architecture, aesthetics, soundscape design and nature relatedness have been discussed in tackling problems of ICE environments.

Keywords

Extraterrestrial ICE Space architecture Soundscape design Microgravity Human factors Habitability 

References

  1. 1.
    Fraser TM (1968) The intangibles of habitability during long-duration space missions. NASA CR-1084. Retrieved 23 Mar 2011Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohanty S, Jørgensen J, Nyström M (2006) Psychological factors associated with habitat design for planetary mission simulators. Space 10–11Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ono A, Schlacht IL, Hendrikse J, Battler M (2013) Habitability in mars mission simulation: sounds as stress countermeasures. In: Lunar and planetary science conference, vol 44, p 1807Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schlacht IL (2006) Color design requirement in microgravity long duration missions. In: Proceeding of international astronautical congress (Paper-Nr: IAC-06-A1. P. 1.06)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schlacht IL, Argenta M, Bandini Buti L, Chi Y, Ferrino M, Masali M, Ono A, Rubano F, Striker L, Rötting M (2010) Proceedings of AIAA international conference on environmental system 2010: holistic human factors in space missions. Barcelona. Manuscript ID: 754269.R2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schlacht IL (2012) Space habitability integrating human factors into the design process to enhance habitability in long duration missions. Doctoral dissertation, VU AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlacht IL, Ono A, Karga V, Mangeot A, Roetting M, Masali M, Foing B (2012) Extreme living solutions: self-sufficient habitat for extreme environments based on space technology. In: Proceedings from 63rd international astronautical congress 2012Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitmore M, McQuilkin ML, Woolford BJ (1998) Habitability and performance issues for long duration space flights. Hum Perf Extrem Environ 3(1):64–74. pmid:12190077Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamaguchi T (2000) A human factors approach for Japanese experiment module development. Aviat Space Environ Med 71(9):A108–A111Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zelenski John M, Nisbet Elizabeth K (2014) Happiness and feeling connected the distinct role of nature relatedness. Environ Behav 46(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations