Abstract
Rapid but uncontrolled economic growth, unstructured working class neighbourhood, unplanned policies of the government, etc., have changed the contours of the emergent city life and its inhabitants in the recent decades. The urban elite interest of a pristine neighbourhood, which is fused with that of the state, has often tried to ‘conserve’ environment with the help of ‘legitimate’ tools like Public Interest Litigation (PIL). Through an ethnographic study, the paper manifests conditions under which the politics of conserving Protected Areas (PAs) operates not only in the village forests but also in cities, in highly inequitable and fabricated ways. It also examines how, in the absence of any established land rights in the cities, due to lack of any particular generational roots of cultural identity, the marginalized population structure within the PAs in Mumbai constitute and establish themselves as a ‘community’ in itself to prevent themselves from getting confined or trapped within discourses of indigenous novelty and cultural belongingness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See “Conserving Asia’s Natural Heritage: The Planning and Management of Protected Areas in the Indomalayam Realm”. Proceedings of the 25th Working Session of IUCN’s Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas.
- 2.
Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad is a unique organization for the women, recognized by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission. They make a wide range of papad, masala, atta, chapatti, appalam and detergent.
- 3.
For details see, Mahapatra (2007). People, park and wildlife in an urban environment: a case study of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai. M. Phil Dissertation, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.
- 4.
Collected from the “Present Status Report as per directions of the Honourable High Court, dated 6th June, 2011”, during the course of the field work.
- 5.
Retrieved January 5, 2015 from http://www.bannedthought.net/India/PeoplesMarch/PM1999-2006/archives/2001/jan2k1/environmental.htm.
References
Adhikary, S. (2009). Urban planning and politics of slum demolition in metropolitan Mumbai. Retrieved from http://www.archidev.org/spip.php?article380.
Alier, J. M. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor. In Conference on Political Economy and Sustainable Development: Environmental Conflicts, Participation and Movements, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. 30th August 2002. Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute of Social Development.
Baviskar, A. (2002). Politics of the city. Seminar, 516. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from http://www.india-seminar.com/2002/516/516%20amita%20baviskar.html.
Baviskar, A. (2004). In the belly of the river: Tribal conflicts over development in the Narmada Valley. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Baviskar, A. (2011). Cows, cars and cycle-rickshaws: Bourgeois environmentalism and the battle for Delhi’s streets. In A. Baviskar & R. Ray (Eds.), Elite and everyman: The cultural politics of the Indian middle classes. New Delhi: Routledge.
Brand, P., & Thomas, M. (2005). Urban environmentalism: Global change and the mediation of local conflict. USA: Routledge.
Chatterjee, P. (1998). Community in the east. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(6), 277–282.
Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.
de Roo, G. (2000). Environmental conflicts in compact cities: Complexity, decision making and policy approaches. Environment and Planning B, 27(1), 151–162.
Gadgil, M. (1991). Conserving India’s biodiversity: The societal context. Environment Update (Evolutionary Trends in Plants) (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 3–8). Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London and New York: Routledge.
Guha, R. (1997). The authoritarian biologist and the arrogance of anti humanism: Wildlife conservation in the third world. The Ecologist, 27(1), 14–20.
Johari, R. (2007). Of paper Tigers and invisible people: The cultural politics of natural resource in Sariska. In G. Shahabuddin & M. Rangarajan (Eds.), Making conservation work: Securing biodiversity in this new century. Permanent Black: Uttaranchal.
Kothari, S. (1996). Whose nation? The displaced as victims of development. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(24), 1476–1485.
Kothari, J. (2002). A right to housing? India together, April 2002. Retrieved April 10, 2016 from http://indiatogether.org/opinions/rhousing02.htm.
Lausche, B. (2011). Guidelines for Protected Areas Legislation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. xxvi 370.
Madhusudan, M. D., & Mishra, C. (2003). Why big fierce animals are threatened: Conserving large mammals in densely populated landscapes. In V. Saberwal & M. Rangarajan (Eds.), Battles over nature: Science and the politics of wildlife conservation. Permanent Black: New Delhi.
Mahapatra, C. (2007). People, park and wildlife in an urban environment: a case study of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai.
Parthasarathy, D. (2011). Hunters, gatherers and foragers in a metropolis: Commonising the private and public in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI(50), 54–63.
Pathak, N., & Kothari, A. Kothari. (1998). Sharing benefits of wildlife conservation with local communties legal implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(4), 2603–2610.
Randeria, S. (2003). Between cunning states and unaccountable international institutions: Dilemmas of social movements and rights of local communities to common property resources. Eurpean Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 27–60.
Randeria, S. (2007). Global designs and local lifeworld. Interventions: International Journal of Post Colonial Studies 9(1): 12–30.
Risbud, N. (2003). The case of Mumbai, India. Understanding slums: Case studies for the global report on human settlements. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu-projects/Global_Report/pdfs/Mumbai.pdf. Accessed on June 11, 2013.
Robbins, P. (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction. Oxford: Wiley.
Saberwal, V., & Rangarajan, M. (2003). Battles over nature: Science and the politics of conservation. New Delhi: Sangam Books.
Sahu, G. (2008). Implications of Indian supreme court’s innovations for environmental jurisprudence. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 4(1), 3–19.
Sen, A. (1992). Life and labour in a squatters’ colony. CSSSC occasional paper 138, Calcutta: Centre for Studies in Social Sciences.
Sen, A., & Pattanaik, S. (2015). Alienation, conflict and conservation in the protected areas of urban metropolis: A case study of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai. Sociological Bulletin, 64(3), 375–395.
Sen, A., & Pattanaik, S. (2016). Politics of biodiversity conservation and socio ecological conflicts in a city: The case of Sanjay Gandhi national park, Mumbai. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 305–326.
Shahabuddin, G., & Prasad, S. (2004). Assessing ecological sustainability of non timber forest produce extraction: The Indian scenario. Conservation and Society, 2(2), 235–250.
Shahabuddin, G., Kumar, R., & Srivastava, M. (2007). Creation of inviolate space: Lives, livelihood and conflict in the Sariska Tiger Reserve. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(20), 1855–1862.
Vaquier, D. (2010). The impact of slum resettlement on urban integration in Mumbai: The case of the Chandivali project. New Delhi: Centre De Sciences Humaines.
Zerah, M. H. (2007). Conflict between green space preservation and housing needs: The case of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai. Cities, 24(7), 122–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sen, A., Pattanaik, S. (2018). Communities in a ‘Protected’ Urban Space and Conservation Politics in Mumbai’s Sanjay Gandhi National Park. In: Mukherjee, J. (eds) Sustainable Urbanization in India. Exploring Urban Change in South Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4932-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4932-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4931-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4932-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)