Skip to main content

Agency and Leadership for Learning and Teaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Self-organizing University
  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we take up a second inconvenient truth in the modern university: Despite the fact that the core business of a university is learning and teaching, those who engage with the effort frequently do not know a lot about it in a professional sense. In the following pages, we frame this issue of agency for learning and teaching as a wicked problem for universities and describe how the problem is addressed in the Self-Organizing University (SOU).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A term popularized by the 2006 motion picture of the same title about Al Gore’s environmental campaign. We described the first inconvenient truth in chapter one as the lack of visible and comparable professional practice at scale in universities David et al.(2006).

  2. 2.

    This refers to the way universities use the existence of award winners, facilities, and grants as a basis for their understanding of what learning and teaching means.

  3. 3.

    A wicked problem is one that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize (Wikipedia 2016).

  4. 4.

    This software will be described in Chap. 7.

References

  • ACT (2009). ACT report: Voluntary system of accountability learning gains methodology. Retrieved from https://cp- files.s3.amazonaws.com/22/ACTReport_LearningGainsMethodology.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, A., & Drengenberg, N. (2016). Transforming the measurement of learning and teaching in higher education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G., & Star, S. (2000). Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camillus, J. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://www.induscommons.com/files/102770262.pdf.

  • Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P. (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. Retrieved from Australian Institute for Teaching and School leadership website: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/linking_effective_professional_learning_with_effective_teaching_practice_-_cole.

  • Conway, M. E. (1968). How do committees invent. Datamation, 14(5), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: Rhetoric or reality? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 66–71. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2013.748479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, L., Bender, L., & Burns, S. (Producers), & Guggenheim, D. (Director). (2006). An inconvenient truth [Motion Picture]. United States: Participant Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drengenberg, N., & Bain, A. (2016). If all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail—How wicked is the problem of measuring productivity in higher education? Higher Education Research & Development. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1208640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, D. (2009, January 19). 4 more definitions of agency. [weblog post. Retrieved from https://asociologist.com/2009/01/19/4-more-definitions-of-agency/.

  • Jones, S. (2014). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Leadership, 10(2), 129–141. doi:10.1177/1742715011433525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Harvey, M., Lefoe, G., & Ryland, K. (2014). Synthesising theory and practice: Distributed leadership in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 603–619. doi:10.1177/1741143213510506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (2001). Cyberculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, O. (2008). Measuring learning outcomes in higher education using the measure of academic proficiency and progress (MAPP). Retrieved from https://cp-files.s3.amazonaws.com/23/RR-0847MeasuringLearningOutcomesUsingMAPP.pdf.

  • Massy, W., Sullivan, T., & Mackie, C. (2012). Data needed for improving productivity measurement in higher education. Research and Practice in Assessment, 7, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Volume 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G., Kuh, G., McCormick, A., Ethington, C., & Smart, J. (2011). If and when money matters: The relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement, and students’ learning outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Scott, S. (2015). Leadership for quality university teaching: How bottom-up academic insights can inform top-down leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 511–531. doi:10.1177/1741143214549970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Coates, H., & Anderson, M. (2008). Learning leaders in times of change: Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=higher_education.

  • Sullivan, T., Mackie, C., Massy, W., & Sinha, E. (2012). Improving measurement of productivity in higher education. Panel on measuring higher education productivity: Conceptual framework and data needs. Committee on National Statistics and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Bain .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bain, A., Zundans-Fraser, L. (2017). Agency and Leadership for Learning and Teaching. In: The Self-organizing University. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4917-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4917-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4916-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4917-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics