Abstract
In this chapter we take up a second inconvenient truth in the modern university: Despite the fact that the core business of a university is learning and teaching, those who engage with the effort frequently do not know a lot about it in a professional sense. In the following pages, we frame this issue of agency for learning and teaching as a wicked problem for universities and describe how the problem is addressed in the Self-Organizing University (SOU).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A term popularized by the 2006 motion picture of the same title about Al Gore’s environmental campaign. We described the first inconvenient truth in chapter one as the lack of visible and comparable professional practice at scale in universities David et al.(2006).
- 2.
This refers to the way universities use the existence of award winners, facilities, and grants as a basis for their understanding of what learning and teaching means.
- 3.
A wicked problem is one that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize (Wikipedia 2016).
- 4.
This software will be described in Chap. 7.
References
ACT (2009). ACT report: Voluntary system of accountability learning gains methodology. Retrieved from https://cp- files.s3.amazonaws.com/22/ACTReport_LearningGainsMethodology.pdf.
Bain, A., & Drengenberg, N. (2016). Transforming the measurement of learning and teaching in higher education. New York: Routledge.
Bowker, G., & Star, S. (2000). Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.
Camillus, J. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://www.induscommons.com/files/102770262.pdf.
Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.
Cole, P. (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. Retrieved from Australian Institute for Teaching and School leadership website: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/linking_effective_professional_learning_with_effective_teaching_practice_-_cole.
Conway, M. E. (1968). How do committees invent. Datamation, 14(5), 28–31.
Corrigan, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: Rhetoric or reality? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 66–71. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2013.748479.
David, L., Bender, L., & Burns, S. (Producers), & Guggenheim, D. (Director). (2006). An inconvenient truth [Motion Picture]. United States: Participant Media.
Drengenberg, N., & Bain, A. (2016). If all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail—How wicked is the problem of measuring productivity in higher education? Higher Education Research & Development. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1208640.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hirschmann, D. (2009, January 19). 4 more definitions of agency. [weblog post. Retrieved from https://asociologist.com/2009/01/19/4-more-definitions-of-agency/.
Jones, S. (2014). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Leadership, 10(2), 129–141. doi:10.1177/1742715011433525.
Jones, S., Harvey, M., Lefoe, G., & Ryland, K. (2014). Synthesising theory and practice: Distributed leadership in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 603–619. doi:10.1177/1741143213510506.
Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369–381.
Levy, P. (2001). Cyberculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Liu, O. (2008). Measuring learning outcomes in higher education using the measure of academic proficiency and progress (MAPP). Retrieved from https://cp-files.s3.amazonaws.com/23/RR-0847MeasuringLearningOutcomesUsingMAPP.pdf.
Massy, W., Sullivan, T., & Mackie, C. (2012). Data needed for improving productivity measurement in higher education. Research and Practice in Assessment, 7, 5–15.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Volume 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pike, G., Kuh, G., McCormick, A., Ethington, C., & Smart, J. (2011). If and when money matters: The relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement, and students’ learning outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 81–106.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Scott, D., & Scott, S. (2015). Leadership for quality university teaching: How bottom-up academic insights can inform top-down leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 511–531. doi:10.1177/1741143214549970.
Scott, G., Coates, H., & Anderson, M. (2008). Learning leaders in times of change: Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=higher_education.
Sullivan, T., Mackie, C., Massy, W., & Sinha, E. (2012). Improving measurement of productivity in higher education. Panel on measuring higher education productivity: Conceptual framework and data needs. Committee on National Statistics and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bain, A., Zundans-Fraser, L. (2017). Agency and Leadership for Learning and Teaching. In: The Self-organizing University. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4917-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4917-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4916-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4917-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)