Skip to main content

Business Environment in China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility in China

Part of the book series: Communication, Culture and Change in Asia ((CCCA,volume 4))

  • 1179 Accesses

Abstract

The previous chapter reviews literature on theories and concepts on CSR, culture , and ownership , and presents a gap for the current study. This section historically reviews the economic, cultural and political environment in China, summarising economic development and political systems since 1978. By introducing these factors in relation to political, economic and cultural systems in China over time, readers will gain a better understanding of traditional cultural beliefs in China. Specifically, this chapter reviews I-Ching, Taoism, Sunzi, Confucianism, and Mohism of Chinese culture. This chapter also reviews CSR in Asia, and CSR practices in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Collective-owned enterprises (COEs) refer to industrial enterprises where production is owned collectively, which also include urban collective enterprises and government-owned township and village enterprises (TVEs). The share of GDP owned and controlled by the state is approximately 50%.

  2. 2.

    Centrally-owned SOEs include entities managed by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC).

  3. 3.

    Joint state-private industries and private industries, which existed pre 1957, have been transformed into state industries.

  4. 4.

    Key reform stages of SOE restructuring and transformation include: corporatisation; ownership diversification; and formation of large enterprises groups.

  5. 5.

    An individual human being, which is not a company or organisation or other legal entity/legal person.

  6. 6.

    The others are Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Indus Valley.

  7. 7.

    According to some folk tales, Laozi was the teacher of Confucius.

  8. 8.

    太极 can be understood as Tao 道 as well.

  9. 9.

    “Don't do unto others what you don't want others to do unto you” and “We reap what we sow”.

  10. 10.

    Using periodicals and books on corporate philanthropy to promote Internet education.

References

  • Alfonso, F., Herrera, M., & Roman, F. (2010). Asia. In W. Visser & N. Tolhurst (Eds.), The world guide to CSR: A country-by-country analysis of corporate sustainability and responsibility (pp. 15–26). UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Powell, G. B., Jr. (1978). Comparative politics: System, process, and policy (2nd ed.). Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almunawar, M., & Low, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development: Trends in Asia. In K. C. P. Low et al. (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia, CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance (pp. 173–196). Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S., & Low, P. (2014). Implementing CSR practices through the value of filial piety. In Low et al. (Eds.) Corporate social responsibility in Asia, CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., Lu, J., & Tao, Z. (2006). The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: Empirical evidence from China. American Economic Review, 96(2), 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettingies, V., & Tan, C. (2007). Values and management education in China. International Management Review, 3(1), 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. (2000). Understanding culture’s influence on behavior (2nd ed.). Canada: Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Z., & Wheale, P. (2004). Creating sustainable corporate value: A case study of stakeholder relationship management in China. Business and Society Review, 109(4), 507–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chair, N. S., & Norris, J. (2012). Business ethics and social responsibility in contemporary China. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 5, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society, 44, 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. R. (2005). Effective government affairs in an era of marketization: Strategic issues management, business lobbying, and relationship management by multinational corporations in China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. (2009). Toward an I-Ching model of communication. China Media Research, 5(3), 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D., Welford, R., & Hills, P. (2009). CSR & the environment: Business-supply chain partnerships in Hong Kong and the PRDR of China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W. (2013). Jian ai and the Mohist attack of Early Confucianism. Philosophy Compass, 8(5), 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. & Ho, M. (2009). Public relations, I-Ching, and Chi (Qi/Ki) theory: A new model from an old philosophy. China Media Research, 5(3), 94-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. (2010). Chi-based strategies for public relations in a globalizing world. In N., Bardham & C.K. Weaver, (Eds.). Public relations in global cultural contexts: Multi-paradigmatic perspectives (pp. 226–249). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darigan, K. H., & Post, J. E. (2009). Corporate citizenship in China. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 35, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denni, A., & Tjiptono, F. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility matter to consumer in Indonesia? Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolor, R. R. L. (2001). Confucianism and its relevance to the Filipino family. Diwartao: College of Arts and Science of San Beda College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K. (2009). Introduction: Global crossroads–corporate social responsibility in Asia. In K. Fukukawa (Ed.), corporate social responsibility in Asia. Florence: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernet, J. (1985). China and the Christian impact: A conflict of culture (J. Lloyd, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R. X. (2010). An introduction to the Chinese economy: The driving forces behind modern day China. Singapore: John Wiley & Son (Asia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, M., & Roman, F. (2014). Corporate and community processes of engagement. In K. Fukukawa (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility and local community in Asia. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A. K. (2004). China’s reforms and reformers. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). Confucius & economic growth: New trends in culture’s consequences. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Measuring relationships in public relations. Gainsville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. (2016). CSR and sustainable development in practice: Examples from Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, India and Kenya. In M. Hopkins (Ed.), CSR and sustainability, from the margins to the mainstream: A textbook (pp. 338–378). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, A. (1998). The complete I-Ching: the definitive translation from the Taoist Master Alfred Huang. US: Lake Book Manufacturing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H. (2000). The personal influence model and Gao Guanxi in Taiwan Chinese Public Relations. Public Relations Review, 26(2), 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H. (2001). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization–public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., & Gardner, S. (2007). A stakeholder view of strategic management in Chinese firms. International Journal of Business Studies, 15, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, C. J. F. (2002). The interplays of relationship types, relationship cultivation, and relationship outcomes: How multinational and Taiwanese companies practice public relations and organization–public relationship management in China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, C. J. F. (2006). Toward the theory of relationship management in public relations: How to cultivate quality relationship? In E. L. Toth (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 443–476). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, P. K. (2009). Is Confucianism good for business ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local, substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, J., & Wang, G. (2014). China’s ethical dilemmas under globalization and uncertainty: implication for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(1), 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, J. & Richer, F. (2009). CSR a virtuous circle. But which circle? And whose ‘virtue’? In K. Fukukawa, (Ed.) Corporate social responsibility in Asia. Florence: Taylor &Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Amaesh, K., Harris, S., & Suh, C. (2013). CSR and the national institutional context: The case of South Korea. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2581–2591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. Y., & Bond, M. H. (1985). The Confucian paradigm of man: A sociological view. In M. S. Tseng & D. H. Wu (Eds.), Chinese culture and mental health (pp. 29–45). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, F. (2012). Culture, philosophy, and Chinese medicine. In F. Wallner (Ed.), Culture and knowledge (Vol. 22). Frankfurt an Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latterman, C., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Li, S., & Schneider, A. (2009). CSR communication intensity in Chinese and Indian multinational companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 426–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. (1974). Introduction. In Lao tzu, Tao Te Ching (D.C. Lau, Trans. and written introduction). Great Britain: Cox & Wyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2009). State Owned Enterprises in China: Reviewing the Evidence. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Wickerham, J. (2010). China. In W. Visser & N. Tolhurst (Eds.), The world guide to CSR: A country-by-country analysis of corporate sustainability and responsibility (pp. 121–127). Greenleaf: Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, J. (translated) (2011). Confucius: the analects. The path of the sage. Taylor R. (annotated). Woodstock, Vermont: Skylight Paths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (2008). China’s CSR expectations mature. China Business Review, 36(6), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2012). Economic reform and development in China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. W. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: window dressing or structural change? Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28(1), 64–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. (2009). The wisdom of Laotse. Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, S. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: Evidence from manufacturing in Guangdong province (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. UMI Number: 3500853).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Thompson, M. (2010). Social enterprise: developing sustainable business. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, G., & Michaelson, S. (2010). The art of war for managers (2nd ed.). Avon, Massachusetts: Aadams Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. (1994). What is distinctive about China’s economic? Transition state enterprise reform and overall system transformation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 18(3), 470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. (2008). A political economy of China’s transition. In L. Brandt & T. Rawski (Eds.), China’s great economic transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni, L. (2014). CSR with Chinese characteristics: An examination of the meaning of corporate social responsibility in China. In Proceedings from 64th ICA 2014, Seattle, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otusanya, O. (2014). CSR and enterprise culture of multinational corporations in developing countries. In S. O. Idowu, A. S. Kasum, & A. Y. Mermod (Eds.), People, people and profit (pp. 29–50). England: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W. Y., & Chang, Y. K. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, C. K., Roberts, D., & Sutton, J. (1998). Doing business in China–The art of war? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 10(7), 190–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoon-Lee, C. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and “putting people first” from a Chinese cultural perspective. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Z., Chang, C., Li, S., & Li, S. (2013). E-Commerce strategy. Hangzhou, China: Zhengjiang University Press & Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, R. (2009). Developing corporate social responsibility in China: The impact of governments, market orientation and ownership structure. In Z. Wu (Ed.), China in the World Economy. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D., Terpstra-Tong, J., Terpstra, R., Wang, X., & Egri, C. (2006). Today’s state-owned enterprise of China: Are they dying dinosaurs or dynamic dynamos? Strategic Management Journal, 27(9), 825–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, Y. (2004). The employee–public-organization chain in relationship management: A case study of a government organization. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. (2001). Introduction. In Dao De Jing: The Book of the Way: Laozi. (M. Roberts and commented, Trans.), (pp. 1–23). Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, J., & Weymes, E. (2007). Reinstating the collective: A Confucian approach to well-being and social capital development in a globalized economy. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 26, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See, G. K. H. (2009). Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. (2010). Social paradigms in China and the West. In K. Fukukawa (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility in Asia (pp. 23–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M. H., Chen, X. (2010). Relational corporate social responsibility: public relations implications in culturally Confucius China. In International Journal of Business and Social Science, Dec. 117–123. Center for Promotion Ideas, USA. Retrieved from www.ijbssnet.com.

  • Siu, R.G.H. (1968). The man of many qualities: A legacy of the I-Ching. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skudience, V., & Auruskeviciene, V. (2012). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to internal employee motivation. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontent. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, C., Mitchell, R., & Sirgy, M. J. (2007). Enabling guanxi management in China: A hierarchical stakeholder model of effective guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suliman, O. (1998). China’s transition to a socialist market economy. Westport, CN: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeple, B., Lieu, N., Thomas, A., Vahedi, S., Chen, E., & Gray, E. (2014). Social entrepreneurship in Singapore, India, and Hong Kong. In K. Fukukawa (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility and local community in Asia (pp. 30–63). U.S.: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorborg, M. (2006). Chinese workers and labor conditions from state industry to globalized factories. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1076(1), 893–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Z., Wang, R., & Yang, W. J. (2011). Consumer response to corporate social responsibility in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, C. K., Yong, P. K. (2014). Guanxi bases, xinyong and Chinese business networks. In C. K. Tong (Ed.), Chinese business: Rethinking guanxi and trust in Chinese business networks (pp. 41–62). Singapore: Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, A. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in socialist Vietnam: Implementation, challenges, and local solutions. In A. Chan (Ed.), Labour in Vietnam (pp. 119–159). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoi, J. (2009). Stakeholders’ perceptions and future scenarios to improve corporate social responsibility in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkmen, S. Y., & Çağil, G. (2014). CSR and energy investments in Turkey. In S. O. Idowu, A. S. Kasum, & A. Y. Mermod (Eds.), People, people and profit (pp. 157–180). England: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermander, B. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in China: A vision, and assessment and a blueprint. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: The harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. & Juslin, H. (2012). Values and corporate social responsibility perceptions of Chinese university students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. H., & Leung, T. K. P. (2013). Guanxi: Relationship marketing in a Chinese context. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, H. (2012). Chinese philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in China: Between the market and the search for a sustainable growth development. Asian Business & Management, 8(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbine, G. (2004). Moral choice and the declining influence of traditional value orientations within the financial sector of a rapidly developing region of the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(1), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Indigenous characteristics of Chinese corporate social responsibility conceptual paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. S. (1992). Chinese social orientation: From the social interaction perspective. In K. S. Yang & A. B. Yu (Eds.), Chinese psychology and behavior (pp. 87–142). Taipei: Laurel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. (2005). Creativity in the I-Ching and in Whitehead’s philosophy. Jiao Yu Zi Liao Kan [Journal of Educational Materials], 30, 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X. (2011). Social enterprise in China: driving forces, development patterns and legal framework. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (1999). All-China federation of industry and commerce and the glorious cause program. In T. Yamamoto & K. G. Ashizawa (Eds.), Corporate-NGO partnership in Asia Pacific (pp. 67–80). New York & Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. (2012). The constitution of China: A contextual analysis. Oxford, UK & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A., Shen, H., & Jiang, H. (2009). Culture and Chinese public relations: A multi-method “inside out” approach. Public Relations Review, 35, 226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in contemporary China. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., & Roper, J. (2011). A Confucian approach to well-being and social capital development. Journal of Management Development, 30(7/8), 740–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, W. D. (2006). Will CSR work in China? Leading perspectives, CSR in the People's Republic of China. Business Social Responsibility Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeteman, K. (2012). Leadership and individual development. In K. Zoeteman, (Ed.) Sustainable development drivers: The roles of leadership in government business and NGO performance. Cheltenham, UK & MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zu, L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility, corporate restructuring and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dashi Zhang PhD, MPhil, MA, BA .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, D. (2017). Business Environment in China. In: Corporate Social Responsibility in China. Communication, Culture and Change in Asia, vol 4. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4825-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics