Advertisement

The Socioeconomic Equity Dimensions of a Transition in Suburban Motor Vehicle Fuel and Technology

  • Jago DodsonEmail author
  • Terry Li
  • Neil Sipe
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions book series (TPUST)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the social and spatial equity implications of a transition to high fuel efficiency fossil-fuel vehicles or to non-fossil-fuelled vehicles for urban travel in Australian cities. The chapter draws on empirical work undertaken by the authors that reveals that the advantages of high fuel-efficient vehicles will largely be disproportionately captured by wealthier households. Given the spatial structure of Australian cities, these households also typically reside in areas well served by public transport and where cycling and walking are relatively more prevalent. The consequences of this connection between technology, socioeconomic patterns and urban structure are that a transition to high fuel-efficient vehicles will likely have adverse socioeconomic consequences for highly car-dependent low income households in the outer suburbs of Australian cities. Policy that can better manage the transition to a lower carbon urban transport system through more systemic reform than market-led vehicle fuel efficiency improvements will be needed if we are to avoid regressive socioeconomic outcomes. The chapter will place this discussion within the context of the wider transitions literature.

Keywords

Mobility Transport Socioeconomic equity Fuel efficiency Suburbs 

References

  1. An F, Earley R, Green-Weiskel L (2011) Global overview on fuel efficiency and motor vehicle emission standards: policy options and perspectives for international cooperation. United Nations Background Paper. UNESDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Anable J, Brand C, Tran M, Eyre N (2012) Modelling transport energy demand: a socio-technical approach. Energ Policy 41:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012) Survey of motor vehicle use; Cat no. 9208.0; Canberra, Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Banister D (2013) City transport in a post carbon society. In: Givoni M, Banister D (eds) Moving towards low carbon mobility. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry M (1984) The political economy of Australian urbanisation. Prog Plan 22:1–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry M (1999) Unravelling the “Australian housing solution”: the post-war years. Hous Theory Soc 16:106–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhat CR, Guo JY (2007) A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp Res B Methodol 41(5):506–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brand C, Anable J, Tran M (2013) Accelerating the transformation to a low carbon passenger transport system: the role of car purchase taxes, feebates, road taxes and scrappage incentives in the UK. Transp Res A Policy Pract 49:132–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadbent J (1987) The push east: Woolloomooloo Hill, the first suburb. In: Kelly M (ed) Sydney: city of Suburbs. UNSW Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  10. Climate Change Authority (2014) Light vehicle emissions standards for Australia. Canberra, Australian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  11. Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B (2012) Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Res Policy 41(6):968–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen MJ (2012) The future of automobile society: a socio-technical transitions perspective. Tech Anal Strat Manag 24(4):377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly H, Gallachóir BPÓ (2011) Modelling private car energy demand using a technological car stock model. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 16(2):93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daly HE, Gallachóir BPÓ (2012) Future energy and emissions policy scenarios in Ireland for private car transport. Energ Policy 51:172–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davison G (1979) The rise and fall of marvellous Melbourne. Melbourne University Press, CarltonGoogle Scholar
  16. Davison G, Yelland S (2004) Car wars: how the car won our hearts and conquered our cities. Allen and Unwin, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  17. Delbosc A, Currie G (2013) Causes of youth licensing decline: a synthesis of evidence. Transp Rev 33(3):271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dennis K, Urry J (2013) After the car. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodson J (2012) Transforming Australia’s housing solution: how we can better plan suburbia to meet our future challenges. In: Tomlinson R (ed) Australia’s unintended cities: the impact of housing on urban development. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  20. Dodson J (2014) Suburbia under an energy transition: a socio-technical perspective. Urban Stud 51(7):1487–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dodson J, Sipe N (2007) Oil vulnerability in the Australian city: assessing socio-economic risks from higher urban fuel prices. Urban Stud 44(March):37–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dodson J, Sipe NG (2008) Shocking the suburbs: oil vulnerability in the Australian city. UNSW Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  23. Dodson J, Sipe N (2009) A suburban crisis?: housing, credit, energy and transport. J Aust Polit Econ 64:199Google Scholar
  24. Florida R, Jonas A (1991) U.S. urban policy: the postwar state and capitalist regulation. Antipode 23(4):349–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frost L (2000) Connections. In: Troy P (ed) A history of European Housing in Australia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallagher KS, Muehlegger E (2011) Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. J Environ Econ Manag 61(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geels DIFW (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860‚Äì1930). Tech Anal Strat Manag 17(4): 445–476Google Scholar
  28. Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilbert R, Perl A (2008) Transport revolutions: moving people and freight without oil. Earthscan, James & James, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  30. Glerum A, Frejinger E, Karlstrom A, Beser Hugosson M, Bierlaire M (2013) Modeling car ownership and usage: a dynamic discrete-continuous choice modeling approach. International choice modelling conferenceGoogle Scholar
  31. Gonzalez GA (2009) Urban sprawl, global warming, and the empire of capital. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodwin P (2013) Peak travel, peak car and the future of mobility: evidence, unresolved issues, policy implications. ITF Round Tables Long-run Trends Car Use 152:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graham-Rowe E, Skippon S, Gardner B, Abraham C (2011) Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transp Res A Policy Pract 45(5):401–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grimal R, Collet R, Madre J-L (2013) Is the stagnation of individual car travel a general phenomenon in France? A time-series analysis by zone of residence and standard of living. Transp Rev 33(3):291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guo JY, Bhat CR (2007) Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: application to residential location choice analysis. J Transp Geogr 15(1):31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harvey D (1985) The urbanization of capital: studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  37. Headicar P (2013) The changing spatial distribution of the population in England: its nature and significance for ‘peak car’. Transp Rev 33(3):310–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirschhorn JS (2005) Sprawl kills: how Blandburbs steal your time, health and money. Sterling & Ross Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Hulsmannm M (2012) General sales forecast models for automobile markets and their analysis. MLDM 5(2):65–86Google Scholar
  40. Jackson K (1987) Crabgrass frontier: the suburbanization of the United States. Oxford University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  41. Kagawa S, Nansai K, Kondo Y, Hubacek K, Suh S, Minx J, Kudoh Y, Tasaki T, Nakamura S (2011) Role of motor vehicle lifetime extension in climate change policy. Environ Sci Technol 45(4):1184–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kloess M, Müller A (2011) Simulating the impact of policy, energy prices and technological progress on the passenger car fleet in Austria—a model based analysis 2010–2050. Energ Policy 39(9):5045–5062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kuhnimhof T, Zumkeller D, Chlond B (2013) Who made peak car, and how? A breakdown of trends over four decades in four countries. Transp Rev 33(3):325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li T, Sipe N, Dodson J (2013) Investigating private motorised travel and vehicle fleet efficiency: using new data and methods to reveal socio-spatial patterns in Brisbane, Australia. Geogr Res 51(3):269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liddle B (2012) The systemic, long-run relation among gasoline demand, gasoline price, income, and vehicle ownership in OECD countries: evidence from panel cointegration and causality modeling. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 17(4):327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lipschutz RD (2012) Getting out of the CAR: decarbonisation, climate change and sustainable society. Int J Sustain Soc 4(4):336–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu J, Santos G (2013) Decarbonising the road transport sector: breakeven point and consequent potential consumers’ behaviour for the US case. Int J Sustain Transp 9(3):–159, 175Google Scholar
  48. Mees P (1999) A very public solution: transport in the dispersed city. Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  49. Mees P (2010) Transport for suburbia: beyond the automobile age. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Metz D (2010) Saturation of demand for daily travel. Transp Rev 30(5):659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Metz D (2013) Peak car and beyond: the fourth era of travel. Transp Rev 33(3):255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Millard-Ball A, Schipper L (2011) Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries. Transp Rev 31(3):357–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moriarty P (1994) Can alternative car fuels reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Int J Veh Des 15(1-2):1–7Google Scholar
  54. National Transport Commission (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions from new Australian vehicles 2013. Melbourne, National Transport CommissionGoogle Scholar
  55. Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Puentes R, Tomer A (2008) The road less traveled: an analysis of vehicle miles traveled trends in the US. Washington, DC, Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  57. Rigal A, Rudler J (2014) Post-car world: why laugh at change? 14th Swiss transport research conference. Monte Verita, AsconaGoogle Scholar
  58. Schipper L, Deakin E, Sperling D (2010) Sustainable transportation: The future of the automobile in an environmentally constrained world. University of California Transportation CenterGoogle Scholar
  59. Schiraldi P (2011) Automobile replacement: a dynamic structural approach. RAND J Econ 42(2):266–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheinbaum-Pardo C, Chávez-Baeza C (2011) Fuel economy of new passenger cars in Mexico: trends from 1988 to 2008 and prospects. Energ Policy 39(12):8153–8162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. The White House (2011) Blueprint for a secure energy future. The White House, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyfield D, Urry J (2012) Greening China’s ‘Cars’: could the last be first? Lancaster, Centre for Mobilities Research, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  63. Urry J (2012) Do Mobile Lives Have a Future? Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 103(5):566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Dender K, Clever M (2013) Recent trends in car usage in advanced economies–slower growth ahead? International Transport Forum, OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker R (1981) Theory of suburbanization: capitalism and the construction of the urban space in the United States. In: Dear M, Scott A (eds) Urbanisation and urban planning in capitalist society. Methuen, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Winter I, Bryson L (1998) Economic restructuring and state intervention in Holdenist suburbia: understanding urban poverty in Australia. Int J of Urban Reg Res 22(1):60–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Urban Research, RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations