Advertisement

Another Suburban Transition? Responding to Climate Change in the Australian Suburbs

  • Tony DaltonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions book series (TPUST)

Abstract

This chapter considers the idea of destabilising the current high-carbon regime and establishing the preconditions for a new sociotechnical regime in Australian suburban cities. It does this in the following four sections. The first section argues that cities can be the site of sociotechnical regimes. In this case, the focus is on the suburbs as a sociotechnical regime within Australian cities. The second section describes the pattern of direct and indirect household energy consumption in large metropolitan cities, which are overwhelmingly suburban cities. This urban/suburban location of high energy-intensive household living is an integral element of the high-carbon sociotechnical regime. The third section argues that the underlying ‘lock-in mechanisms’ producing and reproducing the suburbs have at times been destabilised and reconfigured. It is important to understand what made the new ‘lock-in mechanisms’ viable because this can inform strategic thinking about future change. The fourth section draws a set of preconditions from the history of change in ‘lock-in mechanisms’ that should be considered in the development of transition to low-carbon suburban suburbs. It presents them at three levels – macro, meso and micro – as a means for clarifying the way different types of power is exercised in the making and remaking of energy intensive suburbs. The challenge is how might households live in and remake their cities while they continue to be suburban so that they are more sustainable.

Keywords

Suburbs Energy Housing Housing policy Lock-in Households Historical review 

References

  1. Allon F (2008) Renovation nation. University of New South Wales Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose MD, James M, Law A, Osman P, White S (2013) The evaluation of the 5-star energy efficiency standard for residential buildings. Retrieved from CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson MM, Coleman WD (1989) Strong states and weak states: sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. Br J Polit Sci 19(1):47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2015) Household and family projections, Australia, 2011 to 2036. Retrieved from CanberraGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Energy Market Operator (2016) National electricity forecasting report. Australian Energy Market Operator Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Avelino F, Rotmans J (2009) Power in transition an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur J Soc Theory 12(4):543–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bahadori A, Nwaoha C (2013) A review on solar energy utilisation in Australia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry M, Dalton T (2004) Housing prices and policy dilemmas: a peculiarly Australian problem? Urban Policy Res 22(1):69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Catley B (1996) Globalising Australian capitalism. Cambridge University Press, MelbourneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chester L (2013) The impacts and consequences for low-income Australian households of rising engergy prices. Department of Political Economy, University of Sydney, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  11. Committee of Inquiry into the Australian Financial System (Campbell Inquiry) (1981) Final report. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton T (1988) Architects, engineers and rent collectors: an organisational history of the commission. In: Howe R (ed) New houses for old: fifty years of public housing in Victoria. Ministry of Housing and Construction, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalton T (1999) Making housing policy in Australia: home ownership and the disengagement of the state. Unpublished PhD thesis, RMIT University, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalton T, Chettri P, Corcoran J, Groenhart L, Horne R (2013a) Understanding the patterns, characteristics and trends in the housing sector labour force. Positioning Paper 142. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalton T, Hurley J, Gharaie E, Wakefield R, Horne R (2013b) Australian suburban house building: industry organisation, practices and constraints. AHURI Final Report No 213. Australian Housing and Research Institute Melbourne.Google Scholar
  16. Davison G (1981) The rise and fall of marvellous Melbourne. Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  17. Davison G (1995) Australia: the first suburban nation? J Urban Hist 22(1):40–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davison A (2006) Stuck in a Cul-de-Sac? Suburban history and urban sustainability in Australia. Urban Policy Res 24(2):201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deacon D (1989) Managing gender: the state, the new middle class and women workers 1830–1930. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  20. Dodson J, Snipe N (2008) Shocking the suburbs: urban location, homeownership and oil vulnerability in the Australian City. Hous Stud 23(3):377–401. doi: 10.1080/02673030802015619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Droege P (2008) Urban energy transition: an introduction. In: Droege P (ed) Urban energy transition: from fossil fuels to renewable power. Elsevier, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Estiri H (2015) The indirect role of households in shaping US residential energy demand patterns. Energ Policy 86:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geels F (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Policy 39:495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geels F, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson C, Farbotko C, Gill N (2013) Household sustainability: challenges and dilemmas in everyday life. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gurran N, Phibbs P (2015) Are governments really interested in fixing the housing problem? Policy capture and busy work in Australia. Hous Stud 30(5):711–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamza N, Gilroy R (2011) The challenge to UK energy policy: an ageing population perspective on energy saving measures and consumption. Energ Policy 39(2):782–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horne R, Dalton T (2014) Transition to low carbon? An analysis of socio-technical change in housing renovation. Urban Stud 51(16):3445–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howe R (1988) Reform and social responsibility: the establishment of the housing Commission. In: Howe R (ed) New houses for old: fifty years of public housing in Victoria. Ministry of Housing and Construction, Melbourne, pp 1938–1988Google Scholar
  30. IEA (2008) Worldwide trends in energy use and efficiency: key insights from IEA indicator analysis. Energy indicators. International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones M (1972) Housing and poverty in Australia. Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  32. Kenworthy J (2008) Energy use and CO2 production in the urban passenger transport systems of 84 international cities: findings and policy implications. In: Droege P (ed) Urban energy transition: from fossil fuels to renewable power. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenworthy J (2013) Decoupling urban car use and metropolitan GDP growth. World Transp Policy Prac 19(4):7–21Google Scholar
  34. King P (2016) The principles of housing. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Kok R, Benders R, Moll H (2006) Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input–output energy analysis: a comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energ Policy 34:2744–2761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee S, Lee B (2014) The influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the U.S. household sector. Energ Policy 68:534–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenzen M, Wood R, Foran B (2008) Direct versus embodied energy – the need for urban lifestyle transitions. In: Droege P (ed) Urban energy transition: from fossil fuels to renewable power. Elsevier, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. Moloney S, Horne R (2015) Low carbon urban transitioning: from local experimentation to urban transformation? Sustainability 7:2437–2453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore T, Dalton T (2016) Structuring housing provision for sustainability. In: Horne R, Fien J, Beza B, Nelson A (eds) Sustainability citizenship: living and working sustainably in our cities. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Murray R, White K (1992) A bank for the people: a history of the state bank of Victoria. Hargreen Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  41. Newman P, Kenworthy J, Glazebrook G (2013) Peak car use and the rise of global rail: why this is happening and what it means for large and small cities. J Transp Technol 3(4):272–287Google Scholar
  42. Perkins A, Hamnett S, Pullen S, Zito R, Trebilcock D (2009) Transport, housing and urban form: the life cycle energy consumption and emissions of city Centre apartments compared with suburban dwellings. Urban Policy Res 27(4):377–396. doi: 10.1080/08111140903308859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reiger K (1985) The disenchantment of the home: modernising the Australian family. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  44. Reindersa A, Vringerb K, Blok K (2003) The direct and indirect energy requirement of households in the European Union. Energ Policy 31:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rip A, Kemp R (1998) Technological change. In: Rayner S, Malone E (eds) Human choices and climate change, vol 2. Battelle, Columbus, pp 327–399Google Scholar
  46. Saddler H (2016) Australia’s carbon emissions and electricity demand are growing: here’s why. The Conversation, April 18th, https://theconversation.com
  47. Smith SJ (2008) Owner-occupation: at home with a hybrid of money and materials. Environ Plann A 40:520–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smyth P (1994) Australian social policy: the Keynesian chapter. University of New South Wales Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  49. Swan LG, Ugursal VI (2009) Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: a review of modeling techniques. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(8):1819–1835. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energ Policy 28:817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Corpuz G, Bauman AE (2008) Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971–2003: burning petrol or carbohydrates? Prev Med 46(1):60–62. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watts R (1987) The foundations of the National Welfare State. Allen & Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  53. Whitzman C (2013) Harnessing the energy of free range children. In: Low N (ed) Transforming urban transport: the ethics, politics and practices of sustainable mobility. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Wiedenhofer D, Lenzen M, Steinberger J (2013) Energy requirements of consumption: urban form, climatic and socio-economic factors, rebounds and their policy implications. Energ Policy 63:696–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yates J (2011) Housing in Australia in the 2000s: on the agenda too late? Paper presented at the Reserve Bank of Australia Conference, The Australian Economy in the 2000s, Sydney, 15–16 AugGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Urban ResearchRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations