Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Passive Techniques of Digital Image Forgery Detection: Developments and Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Electronics, Communication and Computing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 443))

Abstract

Photographs and images play an important role in our lives but, in this technology era, equipped with powerful, low cost, and easy to use photo editing tools, people often forge photographs. This practice has posed a question mark on the trustworthiness of images necessitating separation of original images from the tampered lot. Because carefully edited and forged images are very hard to be distinguished from their genuine copies therefore, forgery detection and separation of the forged images from the innocent and genuine ones has become a challenging issue for image analysts. Image forgery detection procedures are generally classified into two broad categories; the active and the passive detection techniques. This paper presents a state of the art review of different passive forgery detection techniques those are proposed by different authors over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haouzia, A., Noumeir, R.: Methods for image authentication: a survey. Multimedia Tools Appl. 39(1), 1–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mishra, M., Adhikary, M.C.: Digital image tamper detection techniques—a comprehensive study. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Bus. Inform. 2(1), 1–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaur, H., Kaur, K.: A brief survey of different techniques for detecting copy–move forgery. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 5(4), 875–882 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shah, H., Shinde, P., Kukreja J.: Retouching detection and steganalysis. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Res. 2(6), 487–490 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, A., Saxena, N., Vasistha, S.K.: Detecting copy-move forgery using DCT. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 3(5), 1–4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra, M., Adhikary, M.C.: Detection of clones in digital images. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Bus. Inform. 9(1), 91–102 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luo, W., Huang, J., Qiu, G.: Robust detection of region-duplication forgery in digital image. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition IEEE, vol. 4, pp. 746–749 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra, M., Adhikary, M.C.: Robust detection of intensity variant clones in forged and JPEG compressed images. ANVESA 9(1), 48–60 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fridrich, J., Soukal, D., Lukas, J.: Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. In: Proceedings of Digital Forensic Research Workshop (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murali, S., Chittapur, G.B., Prabhakara H.S., Anami, B.S.: Comparison and analysis of photo image forgery detection techniques. IJCA 2 (6), 45–56 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhouchen, L.: Fast, automatic and fine-grained tampered JPEG image detection via DCT coefficient analysis. Pattern Recogn. 42(11), 2492–2501 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, R., Oberoi, A., Goel, N.: Copy–move forgery detection on digital images. Int. J. Comput. Appl 98 (9), (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zimba, M., Xingming, S.: DWT-PCA (EVD) based copy-move image forgery detection. Int. J. Digital Content Technol. Its Appl. 5(1), 251–258 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Popescu, A.C., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 53(2), 758–767 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimba, M., Xingming, S.: Fast and robust image cloning detection using block characteristics of DWT coefficients. Int. J. Digital Content Technol. Its Appl. 5(7), 359–367 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahdian, B., Saic, S.: Detection of copy–move forgery using a method based on blur moment invariants. Forensic Sci. Int. 171(2), 180–189 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Junhong, Z.: Detection of copy-move forgery based on one improved LLE method. In: Advanced Computer Control (ICACC) IEEE, vol. 4, pp. 547–550 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roweis, S.T., Saul, L.K.: Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290(5500), 2323–2326 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaur, R.: Copy–move forgery detection utilizing local binary patterns. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Appl. Sci. 7(3), 290–294 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Muhammad, N., Muhammad, H., Muhammad, G., Bebis, G.: Copy–move forgery detection using dyadic wavelet transform. In: Eighth International Conference on IEEE Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization (CGIV), pp. 103–108 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, X., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Wang, S.: A DWT-DCT based passive forensics method for copy-move attacks. In: 2011 Third International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security, IEEE, pp. 304–308 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, J., Feng, Z., Su, Y.: A new approach for detecting copy–move forgery in digital images. In: 11th IEEE Singapore International Conference on IEEE Communication Systems, pp. 362–366 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, G., Wu, Q., Tu, D., Sun, S.: A sorted neighbourhood approach for detecting duplicated regions in image forgeries based on DWT and SVD. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pp. 1750–1753 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Popescu, A, Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions. Technical Report TR2004-515, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, pp. 1–1 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Amtullah, S., Koul, A.: Passive image forensic method to detect copy–move forgery in digital images. IOSR-JCE 16(2), 96–104 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shivakumar, B.L., Baboo L.D.S.S.: Detection of region duplication forgery in digital images using SURF. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 8(4), (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prerna, C., Percy, G.J., Angaline, S., Thanga, B.I.: A key-point based copy–move forgery detection. Int. J. Adv. Inform. Sci. Technol. 12(12), 175–180 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sagawa, R., Masuda, T., Ikeuchi, K.: Effective nearest neighbor search for aligning and merging range images, In: Fourth International Conference on IEEE 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 54–61 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bentley, J.L.: Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun. ACM 18(9), 509–517 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang, H., Guo, W., Zhang, Y.: Detection of copy–move forgery in digital images using SIFT algorithm. Comput. Intell. Ind. Appl. Pacific-Asia Workshop IEEE 2, 272–276 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key points. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muhammad, N., Hussain, M., Muhammad, G., Bebis, G.: A non-intrusive method for copy-move forgery detection. In: International Symposium on Visual Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp. 516–525 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oommen, R.S., Jayamohan, M.: A hybrid copy–move forgery detection technique using regional similarity indices. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inform. Technol. 7(4), 127–134 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bayram, S., Sencar, T., Memon, N.: An efficient and robust method for detecting copy–move forgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 1053−1056 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Solorio, S.B., Nandi, A.K.: Passive forensic method for detecting duplicated regions affected by reflection, rotation and scaling. In: 17th IEEE European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 824–828 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. P. G. Department of Information & Communication Technology, Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha, India

    Santoshini Panda & Minati Mishra

Authors
  1. Santoshini Panda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minati Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minati Mishra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Smart Energy Research Unit, College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Akhtar Kalam

  2. Electronics and Communication Sciences Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    Swagatam Das

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Rangpo, Sikkim, India

    Kalpana Sharma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Panda, S., Mishra, M. (2018). Passive Techniques of Digital Image Forgery Detection: Developments and Challenges. In: Kalam, A., Das, S., Sharma, K. (eds) Advances in Electronics, Communication and Computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 443. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4765-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4765-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4764-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4765-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation