Advertisement

School Playgrounds as a Place of Learning

  • Brendon HyndmanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of learning for life suggests that learning continues throughout the lifespan and is not just the realm of childhood. Importantly, learning for life suggests that not all the skills needed for life are learned in the classroom. The skills of negotiation, bargaining, sharing, tolerance and the basic skills of democracy are thought by many to be learned in the playground, when students are playing, away from the restrictions and interference of adults. Playground activities can provide a mechanism for allowing students to move from what they already know and can master to more advanced knowledge and how students can control what happens and use what they know in their own unique ways to further their understandings and development. A student’s social development can grow through interaction with peers to build social understandings and relationships, to each new situation, bringing what they already know about being with others. Students can engage in rich and meaningful playground activities, apply judgement, get to know and enjoy the power of choice and can experience autonomy, mastery and competence. If students are unable to experience a range of emotions, students’ emotional development could be jeopardised. The cognitive skills that students learn to use as they engage in playground activities are necessary prerequisites for later academic learning. This chapter highlights for school playground researchers how playground activities can enable students to have more resources to draw on and meet curricular objectives to enhance their school learning.

Keywords

Playgrounds Learning School Cognitive development 

References

  1. Bundy, A., Luckett, T., Tranter, P., Naughton, G., Wyver, S., Ragen, J., & Spies, G. (2009). The risk is that there is ‘no risk’: A simple, innovative intervention to increase children’s activity levels. International Journal Early Years Education, 17(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bundy, A. C., Naughton, G., Tranter, P., Wyver, S., Baur, L., Schiller, W., Bauman, A., Engelen, L., Ragen, J., Luckett, T., Niehues, A., Stewart, G., Jessup, G., & Brentnall, J. (2011). The Sydney playground project: Popping the bubblewrap – Unleashing the power of play: A cluster randomized controlled trial of a primary school playground-based intervention aiming to increase children’s physical activity and social skills. BMC Public Health, 11, 680. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chancellor, B. A. (2005). The changing face of play in Australian primary school playgrounds. Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University.Google Scholar
  4. Chancellor, B. (2008). Australian primary school playgrounds: Children’s use of playspaces and equipment. The International Journal of Humanities, 6(5), 97–104.Google Scholar
  5. Chancellor, B. (2013). Primary school playgrounds: Features and management in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Play, 2(2), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colabianchi, N., Maslow, A. L., & Swayampakala, K. (2011). Features and amenities of school playgrounds: A direct observation study of utilization and physical activity levels outside of school time. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dollman, J., Norton, K., & Norton, L. (2005). Evidence for secular trends in children’s physical activity behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(12), 892–897; discussion 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engelen, L., Bundy, A. C., Naughton, G., Simpson, J. M., Bauman, A., Ragen, J., Baur, L., Wyver, S., Tranter, P., Niehues, A., Schiller, W., Perry, G., Jessup, G., & van der Ploeg, H. P. (2013). Increasing physical activity in young primary school children – it’s child’s play: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 56(5), 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haug, E., Torsheim, T., & Samdal, O. (2008). Physical environmental characteristics and individual interests as correlates of physical activity in Norwegian secondary schools: The health behaviour in school-aged children study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyndman, B., & Chancellor, B. (2015). Engaging children in activities beyond the classroom walls: A social–ecological exploration of Australian primary school children’s enjoyment of school play activities. Journal of Playwork Practice, 2(2), 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyndman, B. P., & Lester, L. (2015). The effect of an emerging school playground strategy to encourage children’s physical activity: The Accelerometer Intensities from Movable Playground and Lunchtime Activities in Youth (AIM-PLAY) study. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(3), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyndman, B., Telford, A., Finch, C., & Benson, A. (2012). Moving physical activity beyond the school classroom: A social-ecological insight for teachers of the facilitators and barriers to students’ non-curricular physical activity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 37(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n2.2
  13. Hyndman, B. P., Benson, A. C., & Telford, A. (2014a). A guide for educators to move beyond conventional school playgrounds: The RE-AIM evaluation of the Lunchtime Enjoyment Activity and Play (LEAP) intervention. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.2
  14. Hyndman, B. P., Benson, A. C., Ullah, S., & Telford, A. (2014b). Evaluating the effects of the Lunchtime Enjoyment Activity and Play (LEAP) school playground intervention on children’s quality of life, enjoyment and participation in physical activity. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyndman, B., Mahony, L., Te Ava, A., Smith, S., & Nutton, G. (2016). Complementing the Australian primary school Health and Physical Education (HPE) curriculum: Exploring children’s HPE learning experiences within varying school ground equipment contexts. Education, 3–13, 1–16.Google Scholar
  16. Malone, K., & Tranter, P. J. (2003). School grounds as sites for learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities. Environmental Education Research, 9(3), 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oxford Dictionaries. (2016). Definition of school. Retrieved June 11, 2016, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/school
  18. Pate, R. R., Saunders, R., Dishman, R. K., Addy, C., Dowda, M., & Ward, D. S. (2007). Long-term effects of a physical activity intervention in high school girls. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(4), 276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bohn, C. M. (2005). The role of recess in children’s cognitive performance and school adjustment. Educational Researcher, 34(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pill, S. (2011). Seizing the moment: Can game sense further inform sport teaching in Australian physical education? Revue phénEPS/PHEnex Journal, 3(1).Google Scholar
  21. Titman, W. (1994). Special places; special people: The hidden curriculum of school grounds: ERIC. Godalming: World Wide Fund for Nature/Learning.Google Scholar
  22. Tranter, P. J., & Malone, K. (2004). Geographies of environmental learning: An exploration of children's use of school grounds. Children Geography, 2(1), 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationSouthern Cross UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations