Skip to main content

Discussion and Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper
  • 5738 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Annesley TM. The discussion section: your closing argument. Clin Chem. 2010;56(11):1671–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Funderburk A, Nawab U, Abraham S, DiPalma J, Epstein M, Aldridge H, et al. Temporal association between reflux-like behaviors and gastroesophageal reflux in preterm and term infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62(4):556–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flannery DD, O’Donnell E, Kornhauser M, Dysart K, Greenspan J, Aghai ZH. Continuous positive airway pressure versus mechanical ventilation on the first day of life in very low-birth-weight infants. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(10):939–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenfield K, Matsumura JS, Chaturvedi S, Riles T, Ansel GM, Metzger DC, et al. Randomized trial of stent versus surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(11):1011–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taha DK, Kornhauser M, Greenspan JS, Dysart KC, Aghai ZH. High flow nasal cannula use is associated with increased morbidity and length of hospitalization in extremely low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2016;173:50–5. e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aghai ZH, Mudduluru M, Nakhla TA, Amendolia B, Longo D, Kemble N, et al. Fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: association with cholestasis. J Perinatol. 2006;26(9):550–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guillet R, Stoll BJ, Cotten CM, Gantz M, McDonald S, Poole WK, et al. Association of H2-blocker therapy and higher incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117(2):e137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiser C, Nawab U, McKenna K, Aghai ZH. Role of guidelines on length of therapy in chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):992–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Polin RA. Committee on F, newborn. Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):1006–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polin RA, Watterberg K, Benitz W, Eichenwald E. The conundrum of early-onset sepsis. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):1122–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunn AJ, Gunn TR, de Haan HH, Williams CE, Gluckman PD. Dramatic neuronal rescue with prolonged selective head cooling after ischemia in fetal lambs. J Clin Invest. 1997;99(2):248–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards AD, Dyet L, Halliday HL, Juszczak E, et al. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1349–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hess DR. How to write an effective discussion. Respir Care. 2004;49(10):1238–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zubair H. Aghai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Case Scenario

Case Scenario

In a study comparing the use of fluconazole in preventing fungal sepsis in neonates, you found an unexpected finding of high direct bilirubin (cholestasis) with the use of fluconazole. No other previous studies have reported similar findings. You should:

  1. (a)

    Ignore this finding as no one has seen this in previous studies

  2. (b)

    Mention this finding in the results only

  3. (c)

    Disregard this because the higher incidence of cholestasis seen with the use of fluconazole could be due to chance

  4. (d)

    Discuss this unexpected finding and biological plausibility of fluconazole causing cholestasis in the discussion section of the manuscript

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aghai, Z.H., Carola, D. (2017). Discussion and Conclusion. In: Parija, S., Kate, V. (eds) Writing and Publishing a Scientific Research Paper. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4720-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4719-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4720-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics