AD Uses in Mexico

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the literature of AD determinants and the effects of AD implementation. We intensively analyze Mexico’s AD use, as it is the most frequent AD user in the world. We describe the evolution of the institutional and legislative system of the Mexican AD law, specifically, the Mexican legal and administrative background in AD policies. We also analyze the different patterns of Mexico’s AD implementation against China and other major targeted countries.

Keywords

Antidumping Institutional and legislative system Causes and impacts 

References

  1. Aggarwal, A. (2004). Macroeconomic determinants of antidumping: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. World Development, 32(6), 1043–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. E. (1984). Trade policy, income, and employment. NBER Working Paper.Google Scholar
  3. Bergsten, C. F., & Williamson, J. (1983). Exchange rates and trade policy. In W. R. Cline (Ed.), Trade policy in the 1980s. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  4. Blonigen, B. A., Prusa, T. J. (2008). Antidumping. Handbook of international trade. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Bown, C. P. (2008). The WTO and antidumping in developing countries. Economics and Politics, 20(2), 255–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feinberg, R. M. (1989). Exchange rates and “unfair trade”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(4), 704–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feinberg, R. M. (2005). U.S. antidumping enforcement and macroeconomic indicators revisited: Do petitioners learn? Review of World Economics, 141(4), 612–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Francois, J. F., Niels, G. (2003). Business cycles, the current account and administered protection in Mexico. CEPR Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  9. Francois, J. F., Niels, G. (2004). Political influence in a new anti-dumping Regime: Evidence from Mexico. Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1997). Trade wars and trade talks. Trade and tax policy, inflation and exchange rates. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Irwin, D. A. (2005). The rise of us anti-dumping activity in historical perspective. World Economy, 5(31), 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knetter, M. M., & Prusa, T. J. (2003). Macroeconomic factors and antidumping filings: Evidence from four countries. Journal of International Economics, 61(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Messerlin, P. A. (2004). China in the world trade organization: Antidumping and safeguards. World Bank Economic Review, 18(1), 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moore, M. O. (1992). Rules or politics? An empirical analysis of ITC anti-dumping decisions. Economic Inquiry, 30(3), 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore, M. O. (2006). U.S. facts-available AD decisions: An empirical analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(3), 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Niels, G., & Francois, J. (2006). Business cycles, the exchange rate, and demand for antidumping protection in Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 10(3), 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Niels, G., & Kate, A. T. (2004). Anti-dumping protection in a liberalising country: Mexico’s anti-dumping policy and practice. World Economy, 27(7), 967–983. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00637.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rinaldi-Larribe, M., Lightfoot, W. S., & Zhao, Z. (2013). Does china deserve the market economy status? Journal of Chinese Economic & Foreign Trade Studies, 2(2), 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Staiger, R. W., Wolak, F. A., Litan, R. E., Katz, M. L., & Waverman, L. (1994). Measuring industry specific protection: Antidumping in the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics, 26(1), 51–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tharakan, P. K. M. (1995). Political economy and contingent protection. Economic Journal, 105(433), 1550–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. WTO. (1998). Trade policy review Mexico: Report by the secretariat, World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  22. Zeng, K. (2010). Multilateral versus bilateral and regional trade liberalization: Explaining china’s pursuit of free trade agreements (FTAS). Journal of Contemporary China, 19(66), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of International Trade and EconomicsJiangxi University of Finance and EconomicsJiangxiChina
  2. 2.Research Institute for Economics and Business AdministrationKobe UniversityKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations