Trust for Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing Unfolds It Through Fruit Congenial

  • Nidhi BansalEmail author
  • Ajay Kumar Singh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 4)


Trust is just a feeling to make the things reliable. Higher probability of successful execution of scheduling builds the trust greater. Consequently, probability of failure of task of particular scheduling makes one understand that the scheduling is not good for profit in the market, and one does not trust that. Trust can be generated through many factors or reasons. The fruit congenial concept explores these factors to make the things understandable in actual way. In this review, we will categorize all these factors through flowchart and suitable diagrams and help to think the reality to make/do the things correct toward technology. Trust remains same in real life as well as in technology.


Cloud computing Trust Fruit congenial Scheduling 


  1. 1.
    Wei Wang and Guosun Zeng, “Trusted Dynamic Scheduling for Large-Scale Parallel Distributed System”, IEEE International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, pp. 137–144, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    GAO Zhong-wen and ZHANG Kai, “The Research on Cloud Computing Resource Scheduling Method Based on Time-Cost-Trust Model”, IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology, pp. 939–942, 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jigyasu Dubey and Vrinda Tokekar, “Bayesian Network Based Trust Model with Time Window for Pure P2P Computing Systems”, IEEE Global Conference on Wireless Computing and Networking, pp. 219–223, 2014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Changping Liu, Mingyu Fan, Yong Feng and Guangwei Wang, “Dynamic Integrity Measurement Model Based on Trusted Computing”, IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, vol. 1, pp. 281–284, 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abir Khaldi, Kamel Karoui, Nada Tanabène and Henda Ben Ghzala, “A Secure Cloud Computing Architecture Design”, IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering, pp. 289–294, 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tapalina Bhattasali, Rituparna Chaki and Nabendu Chaki, “Secure and Trusted Cloud of Things”, Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), pp. 1–6, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sneha Kolhe and Sudhir Dhage, “Trusted Platform for Support Services in Cloud Computing Environment”, IEEE International Conference on System Engineering and Technology, pp. 1–6, 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuhong Liu, Jungwoo Ryoo and Syed Rizvi, “Ensuring Data Confidentiality in Cloud Computing: An Encryption and Trust-based Solution”, IEEE Wireless and Optical Communication Conference, pp. 1–6, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li-qin Tian, Chuang Lin and Yang Ni, “Evaluation of User Behavior Trust in Cloud Computing”, IEEE International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling, vol. 7, pp. V7-567–V7-572, 2010.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Varalakshmi Perumal, Judgi Thangavel, Saranya Ramasamy and Swathy Harish, “Dynamic Trust Establishment and Amended Window based Monitoring in Cloud”, IEEE International Symposium on Electronic System Design, pp. 162–166, 2013.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kun Lu, Hua Jiang, Mingchu Li, Sheng Zhao and Jianhua Ma, “Resources Collaborative Scheduling Model Based on Trust Mechanism in Cloud”, IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, pp. 863–868, 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Varalakshmi, T. Judgi and M. Fareen Hafsa, “Local Trust Based Resource Allocation in Cloud”, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Computing, pp. 591–596, 2013.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nidhi Bansal, Amit Awasthi and Shruti Bansal, “Task scheduling algorithms with multiple factor in cloud computing environment”, SPRINGER, vol. 433. AISC series, Third International Conference on Information systems Design and Intelligent Applications, pp. 619–627, 2016.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nidhi Bansal, Amitab Maurya, Tarun Kumar, Manzeet Singh and Shruti Bansal, Cost performance of Qos driven task scheduling in cloud computing, ELSEVIER, Procedia Computer Science, International Conference on Recent Trends in Computing, vol. 57, pp. 126–130, 2015.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nidhi Bansal and Maitreyee Dutta, “Performance evaluation of task scheduling with priority and non-priority in cloud computing”, IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, pp. 1–4, 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringVidya College of EngineeringMeerutIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringMIETMeerutIndia

Personalised recommendations