Skip to main content

A Signaling Game Between a Manager and Investors for Financial Disclosure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Regulation and Reporting

Abstract

This paper discusses the reaction of a manager to voluntary disclosure and the strategic decisions within social contexts concerning financial disclosure . Extensions of the base model examine the interaction of financial disclosure , investor relations, and managerial incentive to disclose, such as demonstrating a signaling game between a manager and investors for financial disclosure . This paper demonstrates how Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act fails to induce voluntary disclosure. While there is a link between the way in which companies raise external capital and the information that the companies disclose, the transformed reaction of disclosure is the signal for the company’s financing policy. With the reaction of investors to voluntary disclosure after information is disclosed, this paper analyzes why the disclosure of information has regulated results as noise for investment. The extra requirement for information shifts the positions of investors toward managers concerning the policy of financial disclosure .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Kimball (1993) risk-averse principals who are willing to bear one risk are less willing to bear another risk, even when the two risks are independent. People are approximately risk-neutral when stakes are small (Rabin 2000). If the principal and the agent are both assumed to be risk-averse in this study, then the reaction of rational managers discussed in Sect. 8.3.2 would be congruent and we would not have to relax the assumption of manager type by discussing the possibility of there being more than just a dichotomy under the Rule of Disclosure.

  2. 2.

    Cheap talk is the situation in which information is shared through ordinary, informal talk. Joseph and Rabin (1996) presented this situation and argued that cheap talk can and often do matter, but it does not generally lead to efficiency. Chen et al. (2008) introduced that in the standard model of cheap-talk communication, an informed Sender sends a message to an uninformed Receiver. The Receiver responds to the message by making a decision, that is, payoff relevant to both players. Talk is cheap, because the payoffs of the players do not depend directly on the Sender’s message.

References

  • Almazan A, Suarez J, Titman S (2003) Capital structure and transparency. Working papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arshad R, Nor RM, Noruddin NAA (2011) Ownership structure and interaction effects of firm performance on management commentary disclosures. J Glob Manag 2:124–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli M, Watts SG (2007) Financial reporting and supplemental voluntary disclosures. J Account Res 45:885–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk L, Neeman Z (2009) Investor protection and interest group politics. Rev Financ Stud 23:1089–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-W, Liu VW (2008) Does the rule for voluntary disclosure induce truthful disclosure? Appl Financ Econ Lett 4:375–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Kartik N, Sobel J (2008) Selecting cheap-talk equilibria. Econometrica 76:117–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter J, Lokman N, Najah MM (2011) Voluntary disclosure research: which theory is relevant? J Theor Account Res 6:77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Drymiotes G (2008) Managerial influencing of boards of directors. J Manag Account Res 20:19–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn E, Ziv A (2008) Intertemporal dynamics of corporate voluntary disclosures. J Account Res 46:567–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst O, Kang S-H (2004) Corporate governance, expected operating performance, and pricing. Corp Ownership Control 1:13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson NH (1977) Interim disclosure and public forecasts: an economic analysis and a framework for choice. Account Rev 52:396–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy P, Palepu K (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. J Account Econ 31:405–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer D, Teoh SH (2009) The psychological attraction approach to accounting and disclosure policy. Contemp Account Res 26:1067–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WB, Schwartz WC Jr (2005) Are investors misled by “pro forma” earnings? Contemp Account Res 22:915–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph F, Rabin M (1996) Cheap talk. J Econ Perspect 10:103–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball MS (1993) Standard risk aversion. Econometrica 61:589–611

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J Financ 54:471–517

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. J Financ Econ 58:3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Sun D (2012) Acquisition and disclosure of operational information. Decis Sci 43:459–487

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney SD (2007) SEC looking hard at Rule 10b5-1 trading plans and practices. Insights: Corp Secur Law Advisor 21:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan VG (1994) An analysis of auditor liability rules. J Account Res 32(Supp.):39–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M (2000) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem. Econometrica 68:1281–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffournier B (1995) The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by Swiss listed companies. Eur Account Rev 4:261–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl EJ, Srinivasan S (2010) Signaling firm performance through financial statement presentation: an analysis using special items. Contemp Account Res 27:289–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronen J, Yaari V (2002) Incentives for voluntary disclosure. J Financ Markets 5:349–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbath BA (1983) Securities regulation–retributive or remedial: what is the objective of imposing criminal sanctions in section 10(b) actions under the 1934 securities exchange act? J Corp Law 8:527–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20:571–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassel EV (2011) Information disclosure in credit markets when banks’ costs are endogenous. J Bank Finance 35:490–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J (2001) Corporate governance. Econometrica 69:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman B (1997) Managerial disclosures and shareholder litigation. Rev Acc Stud 2:181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Veliotis S (2010) Rule 10b5-1 trading plans and insiders’ incentive to misrepresent. Am Bus Law J 47:313–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechman SLC (2010) The relation between voluntary disclosure and financial reporting: evidence from synthetic leases. J Account Res 48:725–765

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen-Wen Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, CW. (2018). A Signaling Game Between a Manager and Investors for Financial Disclosure. In: Gal, G., Akisik, O., Wooldridge, W. (eds) Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Regulation and Reporting. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4502-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics