Skip to main content

Multimodal Layering: Students Learning with iPads in Primary School Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Case of the iPad

Abstract

The chapter discusses the concept of ‘multimodal layering’ as both a theoretical perspective and a methodological framework for analysis. It helps the researcher explore points of potential meaning making coherence created through digital platforms such as iPads. Multimodal layering refers to the multiplicative effect (Lemke in Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325, 2002) when semiotic modes closely associated with a text are reframed in new contexts as users make meaning in digital spaces. The effect occurs in the constant shift between the material and immaterial layers of screens, modes and texts through which individual students need to navigate when reading and writing in learning events (Walsh and Simpson in Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37(2): 96–106, 2014). This layering is made even more complex when meaning is constructed in the social context of the classroom in the dynamic operationalization of iPads/tablets in private and public spaces. We propose that the multiplicative effects existing within the semiotic boundaries of a text alter when multimodal layering occurs as the text is repurposed in a new interaction and the learner is repositioned to respond to the reconfiguring of semiosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress. 2008. Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication 25 (2): 166–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, Cathy, Guy Merchant, Kate Pahl, and Jennifer Rowsell. 2014. The (im)materiality of literacy: The significance of subjectivity to new literacies research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (1): 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Kate. 2010. Reading for meaning: The skills that support reading comprehension and its development. In Interdisciplinary perspectives on learning to read: culture, cognition and pedagogy, ed. Kathy Hall, Usha Goswami, Colin Harrison, Sue Ellis, and Janet Soler, 74–86. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi, Lucrezia, Carey Jewitt, and Sara Price. 2014. The role of touch in preschool children’s learning using iPad versus paper interaction. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37 (2): 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Anne Haas, and Celia Genishi. 2005. On the case. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flewitt, Rosie, Regine Hampel, Mirjam Hauck, and Lesley Lancaster. 2009. What are multimodal data and transcription? In The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, ed. Carey Jewitt, 40–53. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Christine Edwards. 2012. Interactive creative technologies: Changing learning practices and pedagogies in the writing classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 35 (1): 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iedema, Rick. 2003. Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as a multisemiotic practice. Visual Communication 2: 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, Carey. 2009. An introduction to multimodality. In The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, ed. Carey Jewitt, 14–27. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. Edward Arnold: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, Gunther, Carey Jewitt, Jon Ogbourn, and Charalampos Tsaterelis. 2001. Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, Kevin, and Gail Boldt. 2013. Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research 45 (1): 22–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Jay L. 2002. Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication 1 (3): 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, Paul, M., Bonnie, A. Nardi, and James Kallinikos. 2012. Materiality and organizing: In a technological world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Multimodal discourse analysis: A conceptual framework. In Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis, eds. Philip, LeVine, and Ron Scollon, 101–115. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowsell, Jennifer, Gunther Kress, Kate Pahl, and Brian Street. 2013. The social practice of multimodal reading: A new literacy studies-multimodal perspective on reading. In Theoretical models and reading processes, 6th ed, ed. Donna E. Alvermann, Norman J. Unrau, and Robert B. Ruddell, 1182–1207. Delaware: IRA Publication.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Alyson, and Maureen Walsh. 2014. Pedagogic conceptualizations for touch pad technologies. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37 (2): 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, Robert J., Ernest Bond and Jane Bresler. 2006. Examining literate lives as students engage with multiple literacies. Theory into Practice (45) 4: 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Maureen, and Alyson Simpson. 2013. Touching, tapping… thinking? Examining the dynamic materiality of touch pad devices for literacy learning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 36 (3): 148–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Maureen, and Alyson Simpson. 2014. Exploring literacies through touch pad technologies: The dynamic materiality of modal interactions. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37 (2): 96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, Karen. 2010. A is for Avatar: Young children in literacy 2.0 worlds and literacy 1.0 schools. Language Arts 88 (2): 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert K. 2012. Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Human subject research protection: this study was reviewed and passed for ethics permission from the University of Sydney

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyson Simpson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, A., Walsh, M. (2017). Multimodal Layering: Students Learning with iPads in Primary School Classrooms. In: Burnett, C., Merchant, G., Simpson, A., Walsh, M. (eds) The Case of the iPad. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4364-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4364-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4363-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4364-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics