New Technique of Laminoplasty—Modified Hirabayashi with Lateral Mass Screwing and Spinous Process Wiring for Cervical Myelopathy

  • T. Vo Van
  • Ngo Minh Ly
  • Pham Ngoc Cong
  • Vo Ngoc Thien An
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 63)

Abstract

Gold standard laminoplasty techniques of Kurokawa, Itoh have been realized in Vietnam since 1995 with good results. Some disadvantages of these techniques are found: large destruction of muscles, tip of spinous processes, supraspinous ligament, interspinatous ligaments, resection and re-insertion of C2 tip of spinous process; the tailed trapezoid iliac grafts are not always in satisfactory shape as good spacer in Kurokawa technique; the boneceram piece, quite expensive for Vietnamese patients, is not affordable for all patients; the Itoh technique demands a multi-level grafts with multiple silk wiring and it is not easy to make a hole in facet for silk anchorage. The suggested wiring of spinous tip to lateral mass screw is a simple technique as more stable modified Hirabayashi ELP with two weeks soft collar wearing. This prospective study was conducted to introduce the new modified Hirabayashi Extensive Open-door Laminoplasty (ELP) for Cervical Myelopathy (CM).

Keywords

Laminoplasty Modified Hirabayashi ELP Lateral mass screwing and spinous process wiring Cervical myelopathy Vo Van Thanh’s technique 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baba H, Chen Q, Uchida K, Imura S, Shinichi S, Tomita K (1996) Laminoplasty with foraminotomy for coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: a preliminary report. Spine 21(2):196–202Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Maruiwa M, Watanabe M, Hirabayashi K (2002) Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open- door laminoplasty. Spine, 27(19):2108–2115Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daftari TK, Herkwitz HN (1998) Open door laminaplasty. Posterior cervical spine surgery. Principles and techniques in spine surgery. Lippincott, Raven, pp 161–170Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delamarter RB, Scott Smith J (2003) Cervical myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Surgery of the cervical spine. Saunders 124–136Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebraheim N, Xu R, Yeasting Richard (1996) The location of the vertebral artery foramen and its relation to posterior lateral mass screw fixation. Spine 21(11):1291–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ebraheim NA, Klausner T, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1998) Safe lateral mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques: an anatomic study. Spine 23(16):1739–1742Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emery SE (2003) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and cervical kyphosis. Saunders 2003:112–123Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graham AW, Swank ML, Kinard RE, Lowery GL, Dials BE (1996) Posterior Cervical Arthodesis and Stabilization with a lateral mass plate: clinical and computed tomographic evaluation of lateral mass screw placement and aAssociated complications. Spine 21(3):323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirabayashi K, Satomi K (1988) Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine 13:870–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hirayabashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K et al (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spine stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8:693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y; Chiba K (1999) Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1(359):35–48Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Itoh T (1998) En bloc laminalasty. Posterior cervical spine surgery. Principles and techniques in spine surgery. Lippincott, Raven, pp 171–187Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Itoh T, Tsuji H (1985) Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine 10:729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kokubun S, Sato T (1998) Cervical myelopathy and its management. Curr Orthop 12:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kokubun S, Sato T, Ishii Y, Tanaka Y (1996) Cervical myelopathy in the Japanese. Clin Orthop 323:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puschak TJ, Vacaro AR, Wolfgang R, Taliwal RV (2003) Relevant surgical anatomy of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. In: Principles and practice of spine surgery, pp 15–33Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang JM, Roh K-J, Kim DJ. Kim DW (1998) A new method of stabilizing the elevated laminae in open door laminoplasty using the anchor system. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]:80-B:1005–1008Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu R; Haman SP, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1999) The anatomic relation of lateral mass screws to the spinal nerve. A comparison of Magerl, Anderson, and an technique. Spine 24(19):2057–2061Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Vo Van
    • 1
  • Ngo Minh Ly
    • 1
  • Pham Ngoc Cong
    • 1
  • Vo Ngoc Thien An
    • 1
  1. 1.Spinal Surgery Department AHospital for Trauma-OrthopedicsHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations