Dynamic Coordinated Control Method of Planetary Hybrid Power-Split System

Chapter

Abstract

Parameter-matching methods and optimal control strategies of the top-selling hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), namely, power-split HEV, are widely studied. In particular, extant research on control strategy focuses on the steady-state energy management strategy to obtain better fuel economy. However, given that multi-power sources are highly coupled in power-split HEVs and influence one another during mode shifting, conducting research on dynamic coordination control strategy (DCCS) to achieve riding comfort is also important. This chapter proposes a predictive-model-based DCCS. First, the dynamic model of the objective power-split HEV is built and the mode shifting process is analyzed based on the developed model to determine the reason for the system shock generated. Engine torque estimation algorithm is then designed according to the principle of the nonlinear observer, and the prediction model of the degree of shock is established based on the theory of model predictive control. Finally, the DCCS with adaptation for a complex driving cycle is realized by combining the feedback control and the predictive model. The presented DCCS is validated on the co-simulation platform of AMESim and Simulink. Results show that the shock during mode shifting is well controlled, thereby improving riding comfort.

References

  1. 1.
    Matsubara T, Yaguchi H, Takaoka T, Jinno K. Development of new hybrid system for compact class vehicles. SAE Technical Paper 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kimura A, Ando I, Itagaki K. Development of hybrid system for SUV. SAE Technical Paper 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamichi K, Okasaka K, Tomatsuri M, Matsubara T, Kaya Y, Asada H. Hybrid system development for a high-performance rear drive vehicle. SAE Technical Paper 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hutchinson T, Burgess S, Herrmann G. Current hybrid-electric powertrain architectures: Applying empirical design data to life cycle assessment and whole-life cost analysis. Appl Energy. 2014;119:314–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Çağatay Bayindir K, Gözüküçük MA, Teke A. A comprehensive overview of hybrid electric vehicle: powertrain configurations, powertrain control techniques and electronic control units. Energy Convers Manag. 2011;52:1305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duoba M, Ng H, Larsen R. In-situ mapping and analysis of the toyota prius HEV engine. SAE Technical Paper 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duoba M, Lohse-Busch H, Carlson R, Bohn T, Gurski S. Analysis of power-split HEV control strategies using data from several vehicles. SAE Technical Paper 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim J, Kim N, Hwang S, Hori Y, Kim H. Motor control of input-split hybrid electric vehicles. Int J Automot Technol. 2009;10:733–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meisel J. An analytic foundation for the two-mode hybrid-electric powertrain with a comparison to the single-mode Toyota Prius THS-II powertrain. SAE Technical Paper 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang W, Song R, Guo M, Liu S. Analysis on compound-split configuration of power-split hybrid electric vehicle. Mechanism Mach Theor. 2014;272–88.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu J, Peng H. Modeling and control of a power-split hybrid vehicle. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2008;16:1242–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim N, Cha S, Peng H. Optimal control of hybrid electric vehicles based on Pontryagin’s minimum principle. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2011;19:1279–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang H, Zhang X, Wang J. Robust gain-scheduling energy-to-peak control of vehicle lateral dynamics stabilisation, Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;309–40.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang H, Liu X, Wang J, Karimi HR. Robust gain-scheduling energy-to-peak control of vehicle lateral dynamics stabilisation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2014;73:1095–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gao B, Liang Q, Xiang Y, Guo L, Chen H. Gear ratio optimization and shift control of 2-speed I-AMT in electric vehicle. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2015;50–51:615–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips AM, Jankovic M, Bailey KE. Vehicle system controller design for a hybrid electric vehicle. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. 2000. p. 297–302.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baraszu RC, Cikanek SR. Torque fill-in for an automated shift manual transmission in a parallel hybrid electric vehicle. American Control Conference IEEE 2002. Vol. 2, p. 1431–36.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jo H, Park Y, Lee J, Lee H. A development of an advanced shift control algorithm for a hybrid vehicles with automated manual transmission. Int J Heavy Veh Syst. 2000;7:281–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hwang HS, Yang DH, Choi HK, Kim HS, Hwang SH. Torque control of engine clutch to improve the driving quality of hybrid electric vehicles. Int J Automot Technol. 2011;12:763–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    He H, Liu Z, Zhu L, Liu X. Dynamic coordinated shifting control of automated mechanical transmissions without a clutch in a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Energies. 2012;5:3094–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhong Z, Kong G, Yu Z, Xin X, Chen X. Shifting control of an automated mechanical transmission without using the clutch. Int J Automot Technol. 2012;13:487–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moriya K, Ito Y, Inaguma Y, Sato E. Design of the surge control method for the electric vehicle powertrain. SAE Technical Paper 2002.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johannesson L, Pettersson S, Egardt B. Predictive energy management of a 4QT series-parallel hybrid electric bus. Control Eng Pract. 2009;17:1440–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kermani S, Delprat S, Guerra T, Trigui R, Jeanneret B. Predictive energy management for hybrid vehicle. Control Eng Pract. 2012;20:408–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Payri F, Guardiola C, Pla B, Blanco-Rodriguez D. A stochastic method for the energy management in hybrid electric vehicles. Control Eng Pract. 2014;29:257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borhan HA, Vahidi A, Phillips AM, Kuang ML, Kolmanovsky IV. Predictive energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle. American Control Conference, ACC 09, IEEE, 2009. p. 3970–76.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Borhan H, Vahidi A, Phillips AM, Kuang ML, Kolmanovsky IV, Di Cairano S. MPC-based energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2012;20:593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hernandez EM. A natural observer for optimal state estimation in second order linear structural systems. Mech Syst Signal Proc. 2011;2938–47.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang H, Shi Y, Wang J. On energy-to-peak filtering for nonuniformly sampled nonlinear systems: a markovian jump system approach, fuzzy systems. IEEE Trans. 2014;212–22.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang H, Wang J. State estimation of discrete-time takagi-sugeno fuzzy systems in a network environment. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2015;45(8):1525–1536.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Erazo K, Hernandez EM. A model-based observer for state and stress estimation in structural and mechanical systems: experimental validation. Mech Syst Sig Process. 2014;141–52.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Togun N, Baysec S, Kara T. Nonlinear modeling and identification of a spark ignition engine torque. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2012;26:294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rakotomamonjy A, Le Riche R, Gualandris D, Harchaoui Z. A comparison of statistical learning approaches for engine torque estimation. Control Eng Pract. 2008;16:43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vong C, Wong P, Li Y. Prediction of automotive engine power and torque using least squares support vector machines and Bayesian inference. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2006;19:277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang Y, Krishnaswami V, Rizzoni G. Event-based estimation of indicated torque for IC engines using sliding-mode observers. Control Eng Pract. 1997;5:1123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Doostdar P, Keighobadi J. Design and implementation of SMO for a nonlinear MIMO AHRS. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2012;32:94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gao B, Chen H, Ma Y, Sanada K. Design of nonlinear shaft torque observer for trucks with Automated manual transmission. Mechatronics. 2011;21:1034–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Francoa J, Grigoriadisb MAFA. Real-time brake torque estimation for internal combustion engines. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2008;338–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Institute of Technology Press, Beijing and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations