Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Does Inquiry-Based Instruction Affect Learning in a Secondary School Science Class?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Empowering 21st Century Learners Through Holistic and Enterprising Learning

Abstract

This study used a quasi-experiment with pretest–post-test design (quantitative) to compare thinking skills achievement tests of students who practise structured-inquiry-laboratory practices (St-IQL) and students who only receive classroom teaching (CT) using two biology chapters in secondary schools. Two classes of Form 4 students (n = 64) from two public secondary mixed schools in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, were selected for the study. Higher and lower order thinking skills questionnaires (suggested by Bloom) were handed out in the pretest and post-test. The post-test was administered after both classes had done the treatments, respectively (8 weeks), in order to evaluate the level of students’ thinking skills of biology concepts. The students who were exposed to St-IQL treatment achieved higher post-test mean scores than those who were exposed to CT method. A small effect size (partial eta squared) of 0.23 suggests that 23% of the variance in the post-test scores was related to the differences in the instructional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Asba, A., Azman, H., & Mustaffa, R. (2012). Learning styles of Yemeni undergraduate science students. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(2), 571–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning: How do middle school students learn to maximise the efficacy of a water turbine? International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6(A)), 1436–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong, N., & Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Centre Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2005). Integrated curriculum for secondary schools curriculum specifications. Biology Form, 4, 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dika, A., & Sylejmani, K. (2012). The level of impact on student success of participation in lectures and laboratory exercises. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2403–2408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dkeidek, I., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A. (2012). Assessment of the laboratory learning environment in an inquiry-oriented chemistry laboratory in Arab and Jewish high schools in Israel. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafizan, E., Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. (2012). Perception, conceptual knowledge and competency level of integrated science process skill towards planning a professional enhancement programme. Sains Malaysiana, 41(7), 921–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiong, L. C., & Osman, K. (2013). A conceptual framework for the integration of 21st century skills in biology education. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Teachnology, 6(16), 2976–2983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. W., & Ellefson, M. R. (2013). Inquiry-based training improves teaching effectiveness of biology teaching assistants. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e78540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, A., Azeem, M., & Shakoor, A. (2011). Physics teaching methods: Scientific inquiry vs traditional lecture. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(19), 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. C., Zhang, D., & Kahle, J. B. (2012). Effective science instruction: Impact on high-stakes assessment performance. RMLE Online Research in Middle Level Education, 35(9), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketpichainarong, W., Panijpan, B., & Ruenwongsa, P. (2010). Enhanced learning of biotechnology students by an inquiry-based cellulase laboratory. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(2), 169–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (2010). Guided inquiry: School libraries in the 21st century. School Libraries Worldwide, 16(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. J., & Kamarudin, N. (2014). Inquiry in learning science. International Journal of Technical Research and Application, 10(10), 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S.-H., & Lee, G.-G. (2013). Using a concept map knowledge management system to enhance the learning of biology. Computers & Education, 68, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. (2012). In Ministry of Education Malaysia. Preliminary report-executive summary. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Eduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). (2013). 2013 (pp. 1–292).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maria, B., Marjan, G., An, L., Parappilly, M. B., Siddiqui, S., Zadnik, M. G., et al. (2013). An inquiry-based approach to laboratory experiences: Investigating students’ ways of active learning. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 21(5), 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miri, B., David, B.-C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumba, F., Chabalengula, V. M., Wise, K., & Hunter, W. J. F. (2007). Analysis of new Zambian high school physics syllabus and practical examinations for levels of inquiry and inquiry skills. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual—A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandian, A., & Balraj, S. (2010). Driving the agenda of learning by design in science literacy in Malaysia. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pich-Otero, A., & Molina-Ortiz, S. (1998). Laboratory practical work as a technological process. Biochemical Education, 26, 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saat, R. M., & Ismail, N. A. (2003). Instructional strategies and science achievement of form 2 students in Malaysia: Finding from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science study (TIMSS) 2003. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia, 29(1), 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, W. S. L., & Arshar, M. Y. (2010). A preliminary study of chemistry teachers’ question in inquiry teaching. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simandi, V., & Vamcek, J. (2015). The use of inquiry based education in a simulation software environment in pre-service ICT teacher training. International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, 4, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. Y., & Halili, S. H. (2015). Effective teaching of higher-order thinking (HOT) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 3(2), 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trna, J., Trnova, E., & Sibor, J. (2012). Implementation of inquiry-based science education in science teacher training. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies, 2(4), 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, H.-L., Chin, C.-C., Tsai, C.-C., & Cheng, S.-F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 541–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Tilya, F., & Akker, J. (2009). Science teacher learning of MBL-supported student-centered science education in the context of secondary education in Tanzania. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, H. M., Ismail, Z., & Raper, G. (2004). Malaysian primary teachers’ classroom practice of teaching and learning science. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia, 27(1), 166–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 423–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Pre-University Studies, Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Setapak, Malaysia

    Tze Jiun Lee

  2. Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia

    Nurzatulshima Kamarudin, Othman Talib & Aminuddin Hassan

Authors
  1. Tze Jiun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nurzatulshima Kamarudin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Othman Talib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aminuddin Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tze Jiun Lee or Nurzatulshima Kamarudin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Geok Bee Teh

  2. Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Siew Chee Choy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, T.J., Kamarudin, N., Talib, O., Hassan, A. (2017). How Does Inquiry-Based Instruction Affect Learning in a Secondary School Science Class?. In: Teh, G., Choy, S. (eds) Empowering 21st Century Learners Through Holistic and Enterprising Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4240-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4241-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation