Advertisement

Scaffolding Social Support Amongst the Fresher Students Through Mapping Activities

  • Arniza Ghazali
Conference paper

Abstract

Mapping activities (coded as PIT2 and PIT3) as means of transferring learning autonomy to students were implemented and evaluated to understand the way learning of the fresher students in the second semester of their first year in the Bachelor of Technology in BPC (Bioresource, Paper and Coatings) programme was affected. The observed initial tendency of clicking only with classmates of the same ethinicity was severe and the group of learners is thus, hereby addressed as ‘stiff community’. To rectify the situation, the performed PIT3 mapping activities allocating an equal opportunity for students to participate by filling up numbered blank ovals, witnessed intensive interaction across the ethnic groups. Instructor’s deliberation suggests the effectiveness of PIT3 as an indirect instruction to rapport and improvement in the social support. The findings, which are in 100% agreement with students’ self report (SSR), moreover demonstrate the function of mapping activities in reinforcing students’ cognitive engagement through selection of keywords representing the principal idea that learners use in their own exploration of the learning materials. Besides acting as points triggering curiosity, keywords allow transfer of greater learning autonomy to students. The un-stiffening phenomenon from PIT3, which better prepared students for PIT2—verbal description of co-constructed map, in turn, supports learning via good relationship, teamwork and sustainability of performance throughout the academic year. Moving from the desirable scaffold social impact, the applied modes of mapping activity are potentially the seed initiative to inculcate the attributes for global citizenship in any other learning setting.

Keywords

Social Cognitive-engagement Thinking-classroom Mapping 

References

  1. Achor, S. (2011). The happiness advantage: The seven principles of positive psychology that fuel success and performance at work. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  2. Arredando, P. (2013, April). TED talk education. [YouTube] TED Talk Education Forum. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dilnw_dP3xk
  3. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies, M. (2010). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? High Educ. Retrieved from doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
  5. Davies, M. (2012). Chapter 1: What does it mean for students to be engaged? An interpersonal approach to classroom management. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/…/50258_Davis
  6. Ducksworth, A. L. (2013, April). TED Talk Education. [YouTube] TED talk education forum. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dilnw_dP3xk
  7. Fredericks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: a comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report. In S. L. Christenson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Students Engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghazali, A. (2015). Bridging of performance gap between learners in the science and technology classroom, In Proc. International Language and Education Conference 2015, Palm Hotel, Negeri Sembilan, 7–8 October 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Ghazali, A. (2016). Chapter 23—Map interpretation: Tool for rapid learning and assessment tool for cognitive engagement. In F. S. Tang & L. Logonathan (Eds.), Assessment for learning within and beyond classroom. Chennai: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Ghazali, A. (2017). Chapter (in press) rapid grasp of concepts in materials analysis—Local knowledge in the design of thinking classroom. In N. Esa & S. Che Lah (Eds.), Local knowledge transfer mechanisms. USM: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
  11. Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Raganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller-Young, J., & Yeo, M. (2015). Conceptualizing and communicating SoTL: a framework for the field. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 3(2), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robinson, K. (2013, April). TED Talk Education. [YouTube] TED Talk Education Forum. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dilnw_dP3xk
  14. Schuman, S. (2010) The handbook for working with difficult groups: How they are difficult, Why they are difficult and What you can do about it. In S. Schuman (Ed.), International Association of Facilitators, California: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.Google Scholar
  15. Talebzadeh, F., & Samkan, M. (2011). Happiness for our kids in school: a conceptual model. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 29:1462–1471.Google Scholar
  16. Thanosawan, P., & Laws, K. (2014). Global citizenship: differing perceptions within two Thai higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(3), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education—Topics and Learning Objectives Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiti Sains MalaysiaGeorge TownMalaysia

Personalised recommendations