India’s Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation scheme (CCE) seeks to introduce child-centered methods of students’ assessment. Formative assessment is a major plank in this. The article draws upon Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory to analyze and explain the processes of change that have underpinned the development of assessment reform. Case study is used as the research methodology to suggest that creation and regulation of school-based professional learning communities influence teachers’ classroom-based formative assessment practices. It is argued that collaborative efforts of teachers supported by proactive leadership, keeping a consistent focus to change the practices at classroom level empower teachers to become formative assessment leaders.
- Professional learning community
- Formative assessment
- Continuous and comprehensive evaluation
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
For instance, articles of educational relevance were regularly posted on school bulletin boards from daily newspapers, key statements from Assessment Reform Group were found to be posted, etc.
AfL. (2009). Position paper on assessment for learning. Third international conference on assessment for learning. Retrieved December 21, 2010 from http://www.fairtest.org/position-paper-assessment-learning
Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., Shilton, H., & Shahaf- Brazilay, R. (2009). Cycles of inquiry: Formative assessment in service of learning in classrooms and in school-based professional learning communities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 130–149.
Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., & Shilton, H. (2011). Nested contexts that shape assessment for learning: School-based professional learning community and classroom culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 35–48.
Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). (2014). CBSE CCE Report. India: New-Delhi.
Cizek, G. J. (1995). The big picture in assessment and who ought to have It. Phi Delta Kappa International, 77(3), 246–249.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453–477.
Dewey, J. (1929). The sources of a science of education. New York: Horace Liveright.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2002). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 393–405.
Government of India (GOI). (1953). Report of the secondary education commission: Mudaliar commission report. India: Ministry of Education.
GOI. (1970). CABE Committee on examination reforms. Retrieved from http://www.teindia.nic.in/mhrd/50yrsedu/g/T/V/0T0V0E03.htm
GOI. (1986). National policy on education. Ministry of Human Resource Development. Department of Education: India. Retrieved from http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NPE86-mod92.pdf
GOI. (1993). Learning without burden. India: Ministry of Human Resource Development. Department of Education.
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. California, USA: Corwin.
Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
James, M., & Lewis, J. (2012). Assessment in harmony with our understanding of learning: Problems and possibilities. In J. Gardner (Ed.) (2nd ed.), Assessment and Learning (206–229). London: Sage Publictions.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College.
National Concil of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). (2005). National curriculum framework. India: New Delhi.
Nawani, D. (2015). Rethinking assessment in schools. Economic and Political Weekly, L, 3, 37–42.
Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes: Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 85–102.
Priestley, M., & Sime, D. (2005). Formative assessment for all: A whole-school approach to pedagogic change. The Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 475–492.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
Shephard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. USA: Harvard Business School Press.
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bansal, G. (2017). School-Based Professional Learning Community: Empowering Teachers as Assessment Leaders in the Change Context. In: Amzat, I., Valdez, N. (eds) Teacher Empowerment Toward Professional Development and Practices. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4151-8_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4150-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4151-8