A Social Footprint of Nations: A Comparative Study of the Social Impact of Work
Work is essential for most people to live a full and complete life. However, far from being an enjoyable pursuit, many people find work places them in vulnerable and even life threatening positions. More than half of the developing world’s workers (approximately 1.5 billion people) are classified as being in vulnerable employment, trapped in a cycle where low incomes limit the ability to invest in family and future generation’s health and education. No standard footprint methodology has yet been adopted to measure a nation’s social impact of work in a similar way to how environmental footprints measure a nation’s impact on the environment. Here we develop a method to measure the social footprint of nations by compiling eight indicators, ranging from employment to income to days lost due to accidents. We compare these data for the average worker across developed and developing nations. Our results demonstrate that as countries develop, work domestically has fewer negative social impacts and more benefits to individuals. However, as countries develop they also import more negative social impacts through global trade. This leads to developed nations having two very different social footprints of trade—one for domestic workers and one for international labour embedded in its imports. The development of a replicable and comparable social footprint methodology contributes to our understanding of issues surrounding inequality, the social impact of work, how to measure social impact and how we can communicate complex messages around embedded labour. More than half of the developing world’s workers are classified as being in vulnerable employment, trapped in a cycle where low incomes limit the ability to invest in family and future generations’ health and education. Empowering policy makers and business to make choices that mitigate some of these impacts through developing and communicating numerically sound information is a priority to address global inequality. Current measurement techniques vary and lessons learned from having divergent methodologies in environmental footprinting indicate that a robust social footprinting methodology is required. We introduce a methodology to create social footprints of nations measuring the social impact of work embedded in global trade. We show that as countries develop, problematic labour impacts are outsourced to developing countries.
KeywordsSupply Chain Social Impact International Labour Organisation Sustainability Assessment Secure Supply Chain
- Alsamawi, A., Murray, J., & Lenzen, M. (2016). The working conditions footprints of nations. Journal of Cleaner Production (submitted).Google Scholar
- Bangladesh All Party Parliamentary Group. (2013). After Rana Plaza: A report into the readymade garment industry in Bangladesh (p. 60). Parliamentary, UK Parliament, London: Parlimentary Liaison Office.Google Scholar
- Bennett, A. (1910). How to live on twenty-four hours a day: Project Gutenburg.Google Scholar
- Coalition, B. (2014). Trade for growth a new trade regime for the 21st century.Google Scholar
- Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Pickett, K. E., et al. (2014). Time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 505(16 January), 283–285.Google Scholar
- Dreher, A., & Gaston, N. (2008). Has globalisation increased inequality? Review of International Economics, 16(3), 516–536.Google Scholar
- Economist, T. (2014). In search of the good business. http://www.economist.com/news/business/21611103-second-time-its-120-year-history-unilever-trying-redefine-what-it-means-be. Accessed August 12, 2014.
- Eora. (2012). The Eora global multi-region input-output tables. www.worldmrio.com. Sydney, Australia: ISA, The University of Sydney.
- Fairphone. (2014). Manufacturing—Putting employee wellbeing at front and centre. https://www.fairphone.com/roadmap/manufacturing/. Accessed August 10, 2014.
- Friend, C. (2004). Social contract theory. www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/#H4. Accessed July 10, 2014.
- Fuentes-Nieva, R., & Galasso, N. (2014). Working for the few: Political capture and economic inequality. Oxford, UK: Oxfam International.Google Scholar
- GFN. (2014). Footprint basics—Overview. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/footprint_basics_overview/. Accessed August 6, 2014.
- Gómez-Paredes, J., Yamasue, E., Okumura, H., & Ishihara, K. N. (2014). The labour footprint: An input–output based framework to assess labour dimensions of economic activity (submitted).Google Scholar
- Hobbes, T. (1651a). LEVIATHAN. In C. B. Macpherson (Ed.). London: Penguin Books (1985).Google Scholar
- ILO. (2012). LABORSTA—Main statistics (annual): Employment general level, by economic activity, by occupation, by status in employment. http://laborsta.ilo.org. Genève, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.
- International Labour Organisation. (2014a). Forced trafficking, human labour and slavery. http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/lang–en/index.htm Accessed June 13, 2014.
- International Labour Organisation. (2014b). World of work report 2014: Developing with jobs. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
- International Monetary Fund. (2007). World Economic Outlook: Globalization and inequality. Washington, DC, USA: International Monetary Fund, Publication Services.Google Scholar
- Jackson, T., Jager, W., & Stagl, S. (2004) Beyond insatiability; Needs theory, consumption and sustainability. Working Paper Series Number 2004/2. Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
- King, I. (2014). The conflict over conflict-free minerals. Accessed, 20(07/14), 2014.Google Scholar
- Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., & Geschke, A. (2012b). Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(15), 8374–8381. http://dx.doi.org/8310.1021/es300171x
- Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., & Geschke, A. (2012a). Building Eora: A global multi-region input-output database at high country and sector resolution. Economic Systems Research (submitted).Google Scholar
- Mason, R. (2014). Companies not asked to report slavery in supply chains under new laws. The Guardian [online], section.Google Scholar
- McBain, D., & Alsamawi, A. (2014). Quantitative accounting for social economic indicators. Natural Resources Forum (n/a-n/a).Google Scholar
- McBain, D., Wiedmann, T., & Lenzen, M. (2014). The contribution of input-output analysis to understanding impacts of consumption—A review update. Journal of Industrial Ecology (submitted).Google Scholar
- McElroy, M. W., & van Engelen, J. M. L. (2012). Corporate sustainability management: The art and science of managing non-financial performance. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2010). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Moran, D., McBain, D., Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M., & Geschke, A. (2014). Global supply chains of Coltan: A hybrid LCA study using a social indicator. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Accepted May 2014.Google Scholar
- Murray, J., & Wood, R. (Eds.). (2010). The sustainability practicioner’s guide to input-output analysis (1st ed., 1 vols.). New York: Common Ground Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
- Pelletier, N., Ustaoglu, E., Benoit, C., & Norris, G. (2013). Sustainability in trade and development policy. In Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability (Eds.), A life cycle approach to understanding and managing social risk attributable to production and consumption in the EU-27. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union European Commission.Google Scholar
- Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century (Trans.: A. Goldhammer). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Prell, C., Feng, K., Sun, L., Geores, M., & Hubacek, K. (2014). The economic gains and environmental losses of US consumption: A world-systems and input-output approach. Social Forces.Google Scholar
- Solt, F. (2009). Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 231–242. SWIID Version 3.1, December 2011.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2012). The future we want. www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/66/288andLang=E. Accessed August 4, 2014.
- United Nations Environment Program. (2009). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Milan: United Nations.Google Scholar
- United Nations Statistics Division. (2008). The System of National Accounts (SNA). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
- United Nations Statistics Division. (2009). System of National Accounts 2008. New York.Google Scholar
- UNSD. (2011). National Accounts Official Data. data.un.org/Browse.aspx?d=SNA. New York, USA: United Nations Statistics Division.
- Ura, K., Alkire, S., Zangmo, T., & Wangdi, K. (2012). A short guide to gross national happiness index. Bhutan: The Centre for Bhutan Studies.Google Scholar
- Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
- Waring, M. (1988). If women counted: A new feminist economics. San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
- World Bank. (2014). Global economic prospects. In Shifting priorities, building for the future. http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/GEP/GEP2014b/GEP2014b.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2014.