Advertisement

Modeling Risk Emergence and Propagation in Buyer-Supplier-Customer Relationships

  • Kristian RotaruEmail author
  • Mehrdokht Pournader
Chapter

Abstract

The present study aims to identify and formalize the structural and relational patterns, which account for risk emergence and propagation in buyer-supplier-customer service triads. Following the guidelines of the design science research approach and based on the existing literature, buyer-supplier-customer service triads are categorized into a coherent typology according to the role that each supply chain dyad plays in the emergence and propagation of risk within the triad it forms. In the context of this study, such triads are referred to as Risk-aware Service Triads (RaSTs). To explore all the feasible forms of RaSTs, including the ones that have not yet been addressed in the literature, this study adopts the formalism of weighted directed graphs. As a result, a typology based on thirty different types of RaSTs is suggested. This typology allows: (i) to systematize and formally represent a variety of hypothetical scenarios when each of the dyadic structures within buyer-supplier-customer service triads acts as risk trigger, risk taker or risk neutral component of the respective RaST; and (ii) to calculate the maximal and minimal risk index specific to each of the identified type of RaST, thereby facilitating the identification and assessment of risk exposures associated with buyer-supplier-customer service triads. An illustrative example of how the methodological approach underlying the suggested RaST typology facilitates risk assessment in service triads and service networks is presented.

References

  1. Aravind Raj, S., Sudheer, A., Vinodh, S., & Anand, G. (2013). A mathematical model to evaluate the role of agility enablers and criteria in a manufacturing environment. International journal of production research, 51(19), 5971–5984. doi:  10.1080/00207543.2013.825381
  2. Barratt, M., Choi, T. Y., & Li, M. (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 329–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002
  3. Bastl, M., Johnson, M., & Choi, T. Y. (2013). Who’s seeking whom? Coalition behavior of a weaker player in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(1), 8–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2012.03274.x
  4. Bastl, M., Johnson, M., Lightfoot, H., & Evans, S. (2012). Buyer-supplier relationships in a servitized environment: An examination with Cannon and Perreault’s framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(6), 650–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellamy, M. A., & Basole, R. C. (2013). Network analysis of supply chain systems: A systematic review and future research. Systems Engineering, 16(2), 235–249. doi: 10.1002/sys.21238
  6. Bezuidenhout, C. N., Bodhanya, S., Sanjika, T., Sibomana, M., & Boote, G. L. N. (2011). Network-analysis approaches to deal with causal complexity in a supply network. International Journal of Production Research, 50(7), 1840–1849. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.575088
  7. Borgatti, S. P., & Li, X. U. N. (2009). On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 5–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03166.x
  8. Carson, P., Carson, K., Knouse, S., & Roe, C. W. (1997). Balance theory applied to service quality: A focus on the organization, provider, and consumer triad. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(2), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi, T. Y., & Kim, Y. (2008). Structural embeddedness and supplier management: A network perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(4), 5–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00069.x
  10. Choi, T. Y., & Wu, Z. (2009). Triads in supply networks: Theorizing buyer–supplier–supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(1), 8-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03151.x
  11. Choi, T. Y., Zhaohui, W., Ellram, L., & Koka, B. R. (2002). Supplier-supplier relationships and their implications for buyer-supplier relationships. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 49(2), 119–130. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2002.1010880
  12. Ellram, L. M., Tate, W. L., & Billington, C. (2008). Offshore outsourcing of professional services: A transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 148–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finne, M., & Holmström, J. (2013). A manufacturer moving upstream: Triadic collaboration for service delivery. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1108/13598541311293159
  14. Glynn, D. G. (2010). The permanent of a square matrix. European Journal of Combinatorics, 31(7), 1887–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunasekaran, A., & Kobu, B. (2007). Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications. International journal of production research, 45(12), 2819–2840. doi: 10.1080/00207540600806513
  16. Holma, A. M. (2012). Interpersonal interaction in business triads—case studies in corporate travel purchasing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(2), 101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2012.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmström, J., Ketokivi, M., & Hameri, A.-P. (2009). Bridging practice and theory: A design science approach. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 65–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.x
  18. Holmström, J., & Romme, G. (2012). Exploring the future of operations management: Toward an innovation mindset among practitioners and researchers. Journal of Operations Management: Operations & Supply Management Forum, Vol. Essay 15, No. pp.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, Y., Chen, Y.-S., & Linderman, K. (2015). Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, M. E. I. (2011). The impacts of bridge transfer on service outsourcing: A social network perspective. (Doctoral Dissertation), Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  21. Li, M. E. I., & Choi, T. Y. (2009). Triads in services outsourcing: Bridge, bridge decay and bridge transfer. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(3), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Modi, S. B., Wiles, M. A., & Mishra, S. (2015). Shareholder value implications of service failures in triads: The case of customer information security breaches. Journal of Operations Management, 35, 21–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neiger, D., Rotaru, K., & Churilov, L. (2009). Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 154–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niranjan, T. T., & Metri, B. A. (2008). Client-vendor-end user triad: A service quality model for is/ites outsourcing. Journal of Services Research, 8(1), 123–138.Google Scholar
  25. Peng, T.-J. A., Lin, N.-J., Martinez, V., & Yu, C.-M. J. (2010). Managing triads in a military avionics service maintenance network in Taiwan. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(4), 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rajesh, R., Ravi, V., & Venkata Rao, R. (2014). Selection of risk mitigation strategy in electronic supply chains using grey theory and digraph-matrix approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 238–257. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.948579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossetti, C. L., & Choi, T. Y. (2005). On the dark side of strategic sourcing: Experiences from the aerospace industry. The Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 46–60.Google Scholar
  28. Sabharwal, S., & Garg, S. (2013). Determining cost effectiveness index of remanufacturing: A graph theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 521–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Brown, S. W. (2009). Offshore outsourcing of services: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246. doi:  10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x
  31. van de Valk, W., & van Weele, A. (2011). Business service triads: A new area for service research. Paper presented at the IPSERA 2011 Conference Proceedings, Maastricht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  32. van der Valk, W., & van Iwaarden, J. (2011). Monitoring in service triads consisting of buyers, subcontractors and end customers. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(3), 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Iwaarden, J., & van der Valk, W. (2013). Controlling outsourced service delivery: Managing service quality in business service triads. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(9–10), 1046–1061. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2013.776766
  34. Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 307–325. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00081.x
  35. Wagner, S. M., & Neshat, N. (2010). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner, S. M., & Neshat, N. (2012). A comparison of supply chain vulnerability indices for different categories of firms. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2877–2891. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.561540
  37. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. West, D. B. (2001). Introduction to graph theory (Vol. 2). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  39. Wu, Z., Choi, T. Y., & Rungtusanatham, M. J. (2010). Supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 115–123. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.002
  40. Wuyts, S., Rindfleisch, A., & Citrin, A. (2015). Outsourcing customer support: The role of provider customer focus. Journal of Operations Management, 35, 40–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wynstra, F., Spring, M., & Schoenherr, T. (2015). Service triads: A research agenda for buyer–supplier–customer triads in business services. Journal of Operations Management, 35, 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang, J. J., Lawrence, B., & Anderson, C. K. (2015). An agency perspective on service triads: Linking operational and financial performance. Journal of Operations Management, 35, 56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash Business SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Macquarie Graduate School of ManagementMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations