Design and Evaluation of Global Supply Chain Considering Disruption Risk

  • Yasutaka KainumaEmail author


With the rapid advancement of businesses into overseas markets in recent years, the scope of supply chain configuration is expanding globally. Supply chain disruption due to natural disasters such as the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and the flooding in Thailand has become a serious problem. Under the impact of these natural disasters, risk evaluation has been recognized as an important element of supply chain management. In this chapter, we consider disruption risk and develop a model by incorporating supplier decentralization that assumes a global supply chain spanning two countries and consisting of three levels: supplier, manufacturer, and customer. We assume three types of disruption of varying frequency and effectiveness, generated by random numbers by the Poisson process. We assess the global supply chain designed by verifying the effectiveness of supplier decentralization in response to disruptions.


  1. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chopra, S., & Sodhi, S. M. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 52–61.Google Scholar
  3. Cui, Y. (2013). A decision-making model for supply chain resilience. Japan Society for Information and Management Journal, 34(1), 77–88.Google Scholar
  4. Kubo, M. (2006). Global supply chain optimization models. Communication of Japan Industrial Management Association, 16(2), 56–61.Google Scholar
  5. Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 22–30.Google Scholar
  6. Liu, Z., & Anna, N. (2011). Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition. Omega, 39, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan). (2014). website: Retrieved on August 14, 2014.
  8. Sheffi, J., & Rice, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 40–49.Google Scholar
  9. Sodhi, S. M., Son, B., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vidal, C. J., & Goetschalckx, M. (2001). A global supply chain model with transfer pricing and transportation cost allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of System DesignTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHinoJapan

Personalised recommendations