Skip to main content

Socioeconomic System as Reproductions of Economy, Humans, and the Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Evolving Relationship between Economy and Environment

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science ((EESCS,volume 8))

  • 577 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter build a basic framework of the theoretical analysis of economy-environment relationship. Starting from the insights of Karl Polanyi as well as referring to the surplus approach and ecological economics, we perceive the socioeconomic system as being comprised of interacting triple reproductions: reproduction of economy, reproduction of humans, and reproduction of the natural environment.

Economy reproduction has an inherent mechanism to grow by taking in larger quantities of factors of production from other reproductions, that is, labor and environmental resources. Such extensive growth must reach its limit someday. Just as we have experienced the Lewisian Turning Point in the labor aspect, some forms of turning point is inevitable also in the aspect of the environment.

Relations among the three reproductions are coordinated by institutions and change over time. In tracing their status, quantitative indices are beneficial. As indices reflecting the status of the relationship between economy and the environment (economy-environment nexus), we focus on three types of environmental costs—the cost of environmental measures, rent, and latent environmental cost—and define each.

These concepts work as a basis for the theoretical analysis of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This book, though placing importance on the view that the economy is a part of the earth’s ecosystem (Daly and Farley 2011), also takes into account the huge influence of the economy in the real world. Thus, it sees economy and the environment as parallel systems.

  2. 2.

    Investment in production goods is mainly covered by profits, purchase of consumption goods by wages, and purchase of maintenance services by rents, respectively. However, they do not completely correspond. For example, profits and rents are also used for luxury goods.

  3. 3.

    We refer, by the term “rent,” to the Ricardian rent, as well as various other forms of payment against the usage of the natural environment, including compensation for damages and newly introduced charge systems (e.g., tradable permits).

  4. 4.

    The approach of analyzing economic growth as capital accumulation dates back to classical scholars and was succeeded by the surplus approach, the post-Keynesian school, etc.

  5. 5.

    Daly and Cobb (1994) also point to the nature of money as a root of the tendency to grow, stating that “money has a tendency to foster the exponential-growth culture… This happens for two reasons. First, by virtue of the fact that money can be created out of nothing and can grow forever, we tend to think that wealth… can also do these things. Second, with the historical shift from simple commodity production (C–M–C*) to capitalist circulation (M–C–M*) that money brought about, our attention turned to abstract exchange value, the accumulation of which appears to be unlimited….”

  6. 6.

    Strictly speaking, when monetary circulation is taken into account, Say’s law cannot be presupposed and demand for products may play an important role in accumulation. The model in Fig 3.2, being focused on the circulation of goods and services, does not deal with this mechanism, for the sake of simplicity. It will later be analyzed in Chaps. 5 and 6.

  7. 7.

    There are different views on the substitutability of the natural environment, that is, ideas of “weak sustainability” and “strong sustainability.” The former considers that natural capital can be substituted by manmade capital and sustainability is maintained if more manmade capital is accumulated than the natural capital is exhausted, while the latter sees no or little substitutability (e.g., Daly and Cobb 1994). This chapter proceeds with a presumption that there is a certain but limited level of substitutability.

  8. 8.

    The concept of “environmental-resources-substituting goods and services (ESGS)” was initially presented by Okuma (2012). In the series of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) that we will refer to in Chap. 4, SEEA 2003 used the concept of “environmental products,” meaning a wide range of products including environmental protection activities, natural resource management and exploitation activities, environmentally beneficial activities, and minimization of natural hazards (United Nations et al. 2003). Recently, the SEEA Central Framework has introduced the concept of the “environmental goods and services sector (EGSS),” meaning sectors producing goods and services for purposes of environmental protection and resource management. The concept of the “environmental protection expenditure account (EPEA)” also continues to be used, focusing on the field of environmental protection in presenting a methodology to analyze expenditures (United Nations et al. 2014). The concept of ESGS, in this book, is close to EGSS in its scope. It differs, however, in that it uses a theoretical and simple definition of “goods and services that substitute environmental resources,” and in that it enables a detailed analysis on expenditure-basis with referring to EPEA.

  9. 9.

    In this case, not the whole product but the additional cost is regarded as the ESGSs.

  10. 10.

    In this figure, the ESGSs used by human reproduction, as well as the costs accompanying them, are omitted for simplicity.

References

  • Beaud M (1997) Le Basculement du Monde: De la Terre, des hommes et du capitalism. La DĂ©couverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortis H (1996) Notes on the surplus approach in political economy. In: Arestis P, Palma G, Sawyer M (eds) Capital controversy, post-Keynesian economics and the history of economic thought. Routledge, London, pp 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer R, Hollingsworth R (1997) From national embeddedness to spatial and institutional nestedness. In: Boyer R, Hollingsworth R (eds) Contemporary capitalism: the embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 433–484

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daly H, Cobb JB (1994) For the common good; redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly H, Farley J (2011) Ecological economics: principles and applications. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WA (1954) Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester Sch Econ Soc Stud 22: 139–191. Reprinted in Agarwala AN, Singh SP (eds) (1958) The economics of underdevelopment. Oxford University Press, London, pp 400–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1867) Das Kapital. Erster Band, Karl Max/ Friedrich Engels Werke, Band 23, Dietz Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Minami R (1970) Turning point of Japanese economy (in Japanese). Soubunsha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Okuma K (2012) An analytical framework for the relationship between environmental measures and economic growth based on the rĂ©gulation theory: key concepts and a simple model. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 9(1):141–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K (1957) Great transformation. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Røpke I (2005) Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecol Econ 55:262–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uemura H (2007) Reproduction of socio-economic system and inequity in distribution (in Japanese). Polit Econ Q 43(4):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, European Commission, IMF, OECD, World Bank (2003) Handbook of national accounting: integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/pubs.asp. Accessed 25 Nov 2016

  • United Nations, European Union, FAO, IMF, OECD, World Bank (2014) System of environmental-economic accounting 2012: central framework. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/pubs.asp. Accessed 25 Nov 2016

  • WWF (2012) Living planet report 2012. WWF International, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T (2007) Diversity in capitalist economy (in Japanese). Jpn J Comp Econ 44(1):15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Okuma, K. (2017). Socioeconomic System as Reproductions of Economy, Humans, and the Environment. In: The Evolving Relationship between Economy and Environment. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4100-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics