Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 60))

  • 2376 Accesses

Abstract

The detection of gait events plays an important role in gait analysis. The initial foot contact (IC) and the end of foot contact or foot off (FO) represent the start of stance and swing, respectively. They are commonly used to compute parameters that offer information for the characterization of gait.

To determine these events,kinematic methods that implementoptical systems, including conventional video cameras, have been suggested.

The key objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of two event detection methods, one visual (VM) and onesemiautomatic (SAM), which use conventional video recordings, for the visual detection of IC and FO, during level ground and stair walking. The methods were tested in 10 healthy subjects, wearing confortable shoes and walking at a self-selected speed. The accuracy of the proposed methods was compared with force plate data (gold standard). Furthermore, the VM and the SAM were compared with an alternative kinematic method: The Velocity-Algorithm (VA), previously described in the literature.

The results of the level ground test showed that the VM and the SAM detected IC and FO with an absolute mean difference (AMD) lower than 30 ms.

For the stair climbing test, it was found that the VM and the SAM detected IC and FO with an AMD lower than 55 ms.

In general terms, the VM and the SAM produced differences within the ranges reported in the literature for both terrains.

These results provide preliminary evidence supporting the use of both methods for gait event detection onlevel walking as well as stair climbing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Catalfamo P, Ghoussayni S et al. Gait event detection on level ground and incline walking using a rate gyroscope. Sensors (Basel). 2010; 10:5683-5702.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Catalfamo P, Moser D et al. Detection of gait events using an F-Scan in-shoe pressure measurement system. Gait Posture. 2008; 28:420-426.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Desailly E, Daniel Y et al. Foot contact event detection using kinematic data in cerebral palsy children and normal adults gait. Gait Posture. 2009; 29:76-80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hreljac A and Marshall R N. Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data. J Biomech. 2000; 33:783-786.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mickelborough J, van der Linden M L et al. Validity and reliability of a kinematic protocol for determining foot contact events. Gait Posture. 2000; 11:32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zeni J A, Richards J G et al. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture. 2008; 27:710-714.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanlon M and Anderson R. Real-time gait event detection using wearable sensors. Gait Posture. 2009; 30:523-527.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Webster K E, Feller J A et al. Validity of the GAITRite walkway system for the measurement of averaged and individual step parameters of gait. Gait Posture. 2005; 22:317-321.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sant’anna A and Wickstrom N. A symbol-based approach to gait analysis from acceleration signals: identification and detection of gait events and a new measure of gait symmetry. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010; 14:1180-1187.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson M V, Ewins D et al. Evaluation of methods based on conventional videography for detection of gait events. IFMBE Proceedings. 2015; 49: 234-237.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Catalfamo P, Acevedo R et al. Gait event detection during stair walking using a rate gyroscope. Sensors. 2014; 14:5470-5485.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bergmann J H M, Mayagoitia R E et al. A novel method for determining ground-referenced contacts during stair ascent: comparing relative hip position to quiet standing hip height. Gait Posture. 2010; 31:164-168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Arcila Cano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arcila Cano, A., Ewins, D., Shaheen, A., Catalfamo Formento, P. (2017). Evaluation of methods based on conventional videography for detection of gait events. In: Torres, I., Bustamante, J., Sierra, D. (eds) VII Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering CLAIB 2016, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia, October 26th -28th, 2016. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 60. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4085-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4086-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics