Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 60))

Abstract

The use of wearable devices with accelerometers developed to detect falls and motion has been continuously growing because of their small size, low weight, energy efficiency, and low price. However, the number of sensors, their position in the body and estimation methodologies are still open issues when tested in uncontrolled conditions. In this paper, we perform a discriminant analysis to determine which combinations of feature extraction characteristics and accelerometer positions are best fitted to estimate falls and particular movements. A dataset of 33 activities recorded with eight accelerometers distributed along the body of six participants is released as part of this work. Our analysis concludes that a waist-arm combination with a statistical feature is best fitted for most cases. But this work, rather than a single conclusion, is intended to provide a benchmark to other authors. The specific tests explain for example that the foot is not a good location for the accelerometer, or that static features are less relevant than dynamic ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shany Tal, Redmond Stephen J., Narayanan Michael R., Lovell Nigel H.. Sensors-Based Wearable Systems for Monitoring of Human Movement and Falls IEEE Sensors Journal. 2012;12:658 - 670.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Igual Raul, Medrano Carlos, Plaza Immaculada. Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection systems BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2013;12:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pannurat Natthapon, Thiemjarus Surapa, Nantajeewarawat Ekawit. Automatic fall monitoring: A review Sensors. 2014;14:12900-12936.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casilari Eduardo, Luque Rafael, Morón María-José. Analysis of Android Device-Based Solutions for Fall Detection Sensors. 2015;15:17827–17894.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cleland Ian, Kikhia Basel, Nugent Chris, et al. Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities Sensors. 2013;13:9183-9200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. López José David, Sucerquia Angela, Duque-Muñoz Leonardo, Vargas-Bonilla Francisco. Walk and jog characterization using a triaxial accelerometer in IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications (IUCC):1406-1410 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cola Guglielmo, Avvenuti Marco, Vecchio Alessio, Yang Guang-Zhong, Lo Benny. An On-Node Processing Approach for Anomaly Detection in Gait IEEE Sensors Journal. 2015;15:6640 - 6649.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gao Lei, Bourke Alan K, Nelson John. A comparison of classifiers for activity recognition using multiple accelerometer-based sensors in 11th International Conference on Cybernetic Intelligent Systems (CIS), IEEE:149-153 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gao Lei, Bourke A.K., Nelson John. Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems Medical Engineering & Physics. 2014;36:779–785.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yuan Jian, Tan Kok Kiong, Lee Tong Heng, Koh Gerald Choon Huat. Power-Efficient Interrupt-Driven Algorithms for Fall Detection and Classification of Activities of Daily Living IEEE Sensors Journal. 2015;15:1377 - 1387.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li Tao, Zhu Shenghuo, Ogihara Mitsunori. Using discriminant analysis for multi-class classification: an experimental investigation Knowledge and Information Systems. 2006;10:453-472.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. López .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

López, J.D., Ocampo, C., Sucerquia, A., Vargas-Bonilla, J.F. (2017). Analyzing Multiple Accelerometer Configurations to Detect Falls and Motion. In: Torres, I., Bustamante, J., Sierra, D. (eds) VII Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering CLAIB 2016, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia, October 26th -28th, 2016. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 60. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4085-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4086-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics