Abstract
Although there are well-established methods for economic (cost) estimation of any process, the estimation of the environmental and the social effects is relatively less understood and rarely incorporated in engineering calculations. In this paper, the effectiveness of different types of vertical barrier system for a present waste dump is compared in terms of the embodied energy (EE) and carbon emission in addition to the targeted service life. The model used for the assessment is streamlined energy and emission assessment model (SEEAM). The project involved constructing the vertical barrier around Bingipura fill in order to prevent the contamination of nearby water body due to the leachate from the waste dump. Different types of barriers are analyzed: sheet pile walls, concrete barriers, and the slurry-based cutoff walls (Na-bentonite). The performance analysis was carried out in the well-established software POLLUTEv7 which indicated the effectiveness of the sodium bentonite (Na-B) slurry wall and Soil-Bentonite backfill over other two for the leachate containment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrade C (1993) Calculation of chloride diffusion coefficients in concrete from ionic migration measurements. Cem Concr Res 23(3):724–742
Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute (2008) Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA)
Chau C, Soga K, Nicholson D, O’Riordan N, Inui T (2008) Embodied energy as an environmental impact indicator for basement wall construction, Proceedings of Geo Congress 2008. ASCE, Reston, pp 867–874
Chau C, Soga K, O’Riordan N, Nicholson D (2012) Embodied energy evaluation for sections of the UK channel tunnel rail link. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 165(2):65–81
Colorado Department of Natural Resources (2000) Guide to specification preparation for slurry walls and clay liners as a component of a Colorado mines land reclamation permit
Davis SC, Diegel SW, Boundy RG (2012) Transportation energy data book: edition 31. Report No ORNL-6987, US Department of Energy
Hammond G, Jones C (2011) Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE), Sustainability Energy Research Team (SERT), University of Bath, UK
Jiang M, Griffin MW, Hendrickson C, Jaramillo P, VanBriesen J, Venkatesh A (2011) Life cycle greenhouse gas emission of Marcellus shale gas. Environ Res Lett 6(3):1–9
Menzies GF, Turan S, Banfill PFG (2007) Life-cycle assessment and embodied energy: a review. Proc Inst Civ Eng Constr Mater 160(4):135–143
Owaidat LM, Day SR (1998) Installation of a composite slurry wall to contain mine tailings. Tailings and Mine Waste ’98
Rowe RK, Quigley RM, Brachman RWI, Booker JR (2004) Barrier systems for waste disposal facilities. Taylor & Francis Books Ltd (E & FN Spon), London, p 579
Shillaber CM, Mitchell JK, Dove JE (2014) Assessing environmental impact in geotechnical constructions: insight from the fuel cycle. Proceedings Geo Congress 2014, geo-characterization and modelling for sustainability, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 234, ASCE, VA, 3516–3525
Shillaber CM, Mitchell JK, Dove JE (2015a) Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. I: definitions and background. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 10.1061/(ASCE) GT.1943-5606.0001410, 04015083
Shillaber CM, Mitchell JK, Dove JE (2015b) Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. II: working model and example. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 10.1061/(ASCE) GT.1943-5606.0001411, 04015084
Sivakumar Babu GL (2016) Detailed project report for remediation of Bingipura landfill. Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Financial Corporation
Soga K, Chau C, Nicholson D, Pentelidou H (2011) Embodied energy: soil retaining geosystems. ASCE J Civ Eng 15(4):739–749
Starr RC, Cherry JA, Vales ES (1992) A new type of steel sheet piling with sealed joints for groundwater pollution control. In: Proceedings of 45th Canadian geotechnical conference, October 26–28, 1992, Toronto, Ontario
Todd JA, Curran MA (1999) Streamlined life-cycle assessment: a final report from the SETAC North America streamlined LCA workgroup. Streamlined LCA workshop, Society of environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Truc O, Ollivier JP, Carcassès M (2000) A new way for determining the chloride diffusion coefficient in concrete from steady state migration test. Cem Concr Res 30:217–226
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sivakumar Babu, G.L., Pandey, M.R. (2017). Sustainability Analysis of the Vertical Barriers Based on Energy and Carbon Assessment for Leachate Containment. In: Sivakumar Babu, G., Reddy, K., De, A., Datta, M. (eds) Geoenvironmental Practices and Sustainability. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4077-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4077-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4076-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4077-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)