Advertisement

The Prevailing Logic of Teacher Education: Privileging the Practical in Australia, England and Scotland

  • Trevor GaleEmail author
  • Stephen Parker
Chapter

Abstract

Teacher Education (TE) in OECD nations is undergoing its most significant challenge since its relocation from colleges to universities. The focus of this change is the contribution that teacher education makes to the development of teachers for a new political and economic future. Today’s teachers now need to produce students who perform highly on international rankings in PISA (and TIMSS, PIRLS, etc.) in a context of increased neo-liberal governance led by ‘big data’ and policy as numbers (Grek 2009). When students perform at levels below national aspirations, it is their teachers who are deemed to be at fault and it is their teacher education that needs to change.

Keywords

Teacher Education Student Achievement Teacher Education Program Initial Teacher Education Australian Capital Territory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beauchamp, G., Clarke, L., Hulme, M., & Murray, J. (2015). Teacher education in the United Kingdom post devolution: Convergences and divergences. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berliner, D. C. (2013). Problems with value-added evaluations of teachers? Let me count the ways! The Teacher Educator, 48(4), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berliner, D. C. (2014). Exogenous variables and value-added assessments: A fatal flaw. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, D., & Clegg, N. (2010). Forward by the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister. In Department for Education (England) [DfE]. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper (pp. 3–5). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  5. Comber, B. (2012). Mandated literacy assessment and the reorganization of teachers’ work: Federal policy, local effects. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department for Education (England) [DfE]. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  7. Donaldson, G. (2011). Teaching Scotland’s future: Report of a review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  8. Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gale, T., & Cross, R. (2007). Nebulous gobbledegook: The politics of influence on how and what to teach in Australian schools. In A. Berry, A. Clemans, & A. Kostogriz (Eds.), Dimensions of professional learning: Professionalism, practice and identity (pp. 5–21). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  10. Gale, T., & Molla, T. (2015). Social justice intents in policy: An analysis of capability for and through education. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 810–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorur, R. (2015). Producing calculable worlds: Education at a glance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 578–595.Google Scholar
  12. Gorur, R., & Wu, M. (2015). Leaning too far? PISA, policy and Australia’s ‘top five’ ambitions. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 647–664.Google Scholar
  13. Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurst, D. (2013). Say after the minister: Old is new again. Sydney Morning Herald, September 28. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/say-after-the-minister-old-is-new-again-20130927-2ujhn.html#ixzz3oJuHsKF7
  15. Menter, I., & Hulme, M. (2011). Teacher education reform in Scotland: National and global influences. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(4), 387–397.Google Scholar
  16. Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2010). Schooling in disadvantaged communities: Playing the game from the back of the field. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Nussbaum, M. C. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: Defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20(2), 202–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). PISA: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Pyne, C. (2013). PISA results show more work to be done. Media Release, December 3. https://ministers.education.gov.au/pyne/pisa-results-show-more-work-be-done
  21. Scottish Government. (2011). Continuing to build excellence in teaching—The Scottish government’s response to teaching Scotland’s future. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/920/0114570.pdf
  22. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skourdoumbis, A. (2014). Teacher effectiveness: Making the difference to student achievement? British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skourdoumbis, A., & Gale, T. (2013). Classroom teacher effectiveness research: A conceptual critique. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 892–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014a). Issues paper. Canberra: Australian Government. http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/files/temag_issues_paper_-_april_2014_4.pdf
  27. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014b). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra: Australian Government. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_print.pdf
  28. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2015). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Australian government response. Canberra: Australian Government. http://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/150212_ag_response_-_final.pdf
  29. Thrupp, M., & Lupton, R. (2006). Taking school contexts more seriously: The social justice challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(3), 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker, J. (2014). Pyne eyes national direct instruction rollout. The Australian, July 2. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/pyne-eyes-national-direct-instruction-rollout/story-fn59niix-1226974451763

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GlasgowGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations