Advertisement

Equality and Education Policy in the European Union—An Example from the Case of Roma

  • Nafsika AlexiadouEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Education Policy & Social Inequality book series (EPSI, volume 1)

Abstract

The European Union represents a transnational level of polity where education policies are constructed in parallel to those of nation states, and where equality is framed both in legal frameworks and in policies around citizenship and inclusion. This chapter focuses attention on the interplay between the legal and the policy landscapes around equality and their relation to education policy, and explores these ideas in relation to the Roma minority, and the efforts of the EU to address their experience of multiple inequalities across the continent. The process of developing an education and social policy, and the refinement of equality and anti-discrimination legislation, contribute to a reframing of equality beyond the borders of national policies, and open up new opportunities for their negotiation. The case of Roma EU policies suggests that a combination of legal and policy processes is necessary to address issues of inequalities in education. But there are political risks with the EU taking over such policy work especially when the equality definitions used are narrow in their remit, and when national governments lack the political will to implement EU policies.

Keywords

European Union Member State Education Policy European Union Member State European Union Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The arguments developed in this chapter draw on research partly supported by a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions Project (Research and Innovation Staff Exchange, Horizon 2020), with the title Higher Education Internationalisation and Mobility: Inclusion, Equalities and Innovation. Grant agreement No. 643739. I wish to thank the staff at the Roma Education Fund, the Decade of Roma Inclusion Secretariat, and the European Roma Rights Center, for valuable discussions and analyses in relation to Roma education in Europe.

References

  1. Alexiadou, N. (2014). Policy learning and europeanisation in education: The governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge. In A. Nordin & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational policy-flows in European education Conceptualizing and governing knowledge (pp. 123–140). Oxford Studies in Comparative Education: Symposium.Google Scholar
  2. Arnesen, A.-L., Lahelma, E., Lundahl, L., & Öhrn, E. (Eds.). (2014). Fair and competitive? Critical perspectives on contemporary Nordic schooling. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, J. S., & Youdell, D. (2007). Hidden privatization in public education. Report prepared for the Education International, 5th World Congress.Google Scholar
  4. Brüggemann, C. (2012). Roma education in comparative perspective. Analysis of the UNDP/World Bank/EC regional Roma survey 2011. Roma Inclusion Working Papers. Bratislava: UNDP.Google Scholar
  5. Bunescu, I. (2014). Roma in Europe: The politics of collective identity formation. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Council of the European Union. (2000). Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 Implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. Official Journal of the European Communities. I.180/22.Google Scholar
  7. Council of the European Union. (2011). EPSCO Council Conclusions on an EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 2020. EPSCO, 19 May 2011. 10658/11.Google Scholar
  8. Council of the European Union. (2013). Council recommendation on effective Roma integration measures in the member states employment, social policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting Brussels, 9–10 December.Google Scholar
  9. Crenshaw, K. W. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1331–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crouch, C. (1999). Social change in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Daly, M. (2012). Paradigms in EU social policy: a critical account of ‘Europe 2020’. Transfer ETUI, 18(3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Anti-Poverty Network. (2015). EAPN supports national pilot projects on ‘Europe 2020’ and the European Semester. EAPN. http://www.eapn.eu/en/news-and-publications/news/eapn-news/eapn-supports-national-pilot-projects-on-europe-2020-and-the-european-semester
  13. European Commission. (2010a). ‘Europe 2020’. A Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from the Commission, Brussels, COM(2010) 2020.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission (2010b). Commission Staff Working Document. Lisbon Strategy evaluation document. SEC(2010) 114 final.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2012). National Roma Integration Strategies: A first step in the implementation of the EU Framework. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament. The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2012) 226 final.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2014). Report on the Implementation of the EU Framework, on National Roma Integration Strategies. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2014) 209 final.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Report on the implementation of the EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies 2015. COM(2015) 299 final.Google Scholar
  18. ERRC. (2014). Going nowhere? Western Balkan Roma and EU visa liberalisation. Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre, 1.Google Scholar
  19. Eurostat. (2015). Eurostat File:Youth unemployment, 2013Q4. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/File:Youth_unemployment,_2013Q4_(%25).png
  20. FRA. (2014). Roma survey—Data in focus. Education: the situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.Google Scholar
  21. Fraser, N. (2007). Reframing justice in a globalizing world. In D. Held & A. Kaya (Eds.), Global inequality. patterns and explanations (pp. 253–268). Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, E., & Garaz, S. (2013). Support for Roma in tertiary education and social cohesion. In M. Miskovic (Ed.), Roma education in Europe practices, policies, and politics. Abington: Routledge. pp. 149−166.Google Scholar
  23. Gewirtz, S. (2006). Towards a contextualized analysis of social justice in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gobbo, F. (2009). The INSETRom project in Turin (Italy): Outcomes and reflections. Teacher Training for Roma Inclusion. Intercultural Education, 29(6), 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guiraudon, V. (2009). Equality in the making: implementing European non-discrimination law. Citizenship Studies, 13(5), 527−549.Google Scholar
  26. Gulson, K., Clarke, M., & Petersen, E. B. (2015). Education policy and contemporary theory: Implications for research. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Hammarberg, T. (2011). Human rights in Europe: No grounds for complacency. Commissioner for Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  28. Hancock, I. (2006). On Romany origins and identity. Questions for discussion. In A. Marsh & E. Strand (Eds.), Gypsies and the problem of identities: Contextual, constructed and contested. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul. pp. 69−92.Google Scholar
  29. Herakova, L. L. (2009). Identity, communication, inclusion: The Roma and (new) Europe. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2(4), 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, K. (2013). Introduction: All change. In K. Jones, G. Dreux, R. Canadell, R. Innes, A. Traianou, & N. Hirtt (Eds.), Education in Europe: The politics of Austerity. Radical Books. pp.1−18.Google Scholar
  31. Kostakopoulou, D. (2015). European Union citizenship and Member State nationality: updating or upgrading the link? In EUDO Observatory on Citizenship. http://eudo-citizenship.eu/commentaries/citizenship-forum/citizenship-forum-cat/254-has-the-european-court-of-justice-challenged-member-state-sovereignty-in-nationality-law?showall=&start=2
  32. Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lange, B., & Alexiadou, N. (2010). Policy learning and governance of education policy in the EU. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New scalar politics: Implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayall, D. (2004). Gypsy identities 1500–2000, From Egyptians and moon-men to the ethnic Romany. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. McCrudden, C., & Kountouros, H. (2006). Human rights and European equality law. University of Oxford—Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Working Paper 8/2006.Google Scholar
  37. McCrudden, C., & Prechal, S. (2009). The Concepts of Equality and Non-discrimination in Europe: A practical approach. European Network of Legal Experts in the Field of Gender Equality. European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit G.Google Scholar
  38. Meehan, E. (1997). Political pluralism and European citizenship. In P. Leaning & A. Weale (Eds.), Citizenship, democracy and the New Europe (pp. 69–85). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Messing, V. (2014). Methodological puzzles of surveying Roma/Gypsy populations. Ethnicities, 14(6), 811–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Milcher, S., & Fischer, M. M. (2011). On labour market discrimination against Roma in South East Europe. Papers in Regional Science, 90(4), 773–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mutua, M. (2007). Standard setting in human rights: Critique and prognosis. Human Rights Quarterly, 29, 547–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nóvoa, A. (2013). The blindness of Europe: New fabrications in the European educational space. Sisyphus—Journal ofEducation, 1(1), 104–123.Google Scholar
  43. OJEU. (2012). Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  44. O’Higgins, N., & Bruggemann, C. (2014). The consequences of cumulative discrimination: How special schooling influences employment and wages of Roma in the Czech Republic. European Educational Research Journal, 13(3), 282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oke, N. (2009). Globalising time and space: Temporal and spatial considerations in discourses of globalisation. International Political Sociology, 3, 310–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Nions, H. (2015). Warehouses and Window-Dressing: A Legal Perspective on Educational Segregation in Europe. Approaches to the Education of Roma in Europe. ZEP—Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspädagogik, 38. Jahrgang, 1/2015.Google Scholar
  47. Osler, A. (2015). Human rights education, postcolonial scholarship, and action for social justice. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43, 244–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parreira Do Amaral, M., Dale, R., & Loncle, P. (Eds.). (2015). Shaping the future of young Europeans. Education governance in eight European Countries. Didcot: Symposium.Google Scholar
  49. Pasias, G., & Flouris, G. (2011). The European citizenship paradigm in a dystopian context: Weak symbolisms, profound deficits and measurable competences. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 6(2), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pusztai, G. (2015). Pathways to Success in Higher Education. Rethinking the Social Capital Theory in the Light of Institutional Diversity. Higher Education Research and Policy—7. Frankfurt & Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  51. Ram, M. (2010). Interests, norms and advocacy: Explaining the emergence of the Roma onto the EU’s agenda. Ethnopolitics, 9(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richardson, J. (2015). The EU as a policy-making state. A policy system like any other? In J. Richardson & S. Mazey (Eds.), European Union—Power and policy making (4th ed., pp. 3–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Robertson, S. (2011). The new spatial politics of (re)bordering and (re)ordering the state-education-citizen relation. International Review of Education, 57, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rorke, B. (2013). Beyond first steps: What next for the EU framework for Roma Integration? Report. Open Society Foundations. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/beyond-first-steps-what-next-eu-framework-roma-integration
  55. Ross, M. (2010). Solidarity—A new constitutional paradigm for the EU? In M. Ross & Y. Borgmann-Prebil (Eds.), Promoting solidarity in the European Union (pp. 23–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rostas, I., & Ryder, A. (2012). EU framework for national Roma integration strategies: Insights into empowerment and inclusive policy development. In J. Richardson, & A. Ryder (Eds.), Gypsies and Travellers: Empowerment and inclusion in British Society. Bristol: Policy Press. pp.187−206.Google Scholar
  57. Rövid, M. (2011). One-size-fits-all Roma? On the normative dilemmas of the emerging European Roma policy. Romani Studies, 21(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seddon, T. (2014). Making educational spaces through boundary work: Territorialisation and ‘boundarying’. Globalisation. Societies and Education, 12(1), 10–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sobotka, E., & Vermeersch, P. (2012). Governing human rights and Roma inclusion: Can the EU be a catalyst for local social change? Human Rights Quarterly, 34(3), 800–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Souto-Otero, M. (2016). Policies that speak discourses? Neo-liberalism, discursive change and European education policy trajectories. In N. Lendvai & P. Kennett (Eds.), European Social Policy. Forthcoming. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  61. Tambini, D. (2001). Post-national citizenship. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(2), 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Traianou, A. (2013). Greek education reform: Resistance and despair. In K. Jones, et al. (Eds.), op.cit. pp.86−112.Google Scholar
  63. van Baar, H. (2011). The European Roma: Minority representation, memory and the limits of transnational governmentality. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  64. Verloo, M. (2006). Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verloo, M., & Walby, S. (2012). Introduction: The implications of theory and practice of comparing the treatment of intersectionality in the equality architecture in Europe. Social Politics, 19(4), 433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vermeersch, P. (2012). Reframing the Roma: EU initiatives and the politics of reinterpretation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(8), 1195–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xanthaki, A. (2005). Hope dies last: An EU directive on Roma integration. European Public Law, 11(4), 515–526.Google Scholar
  68. Yuval-Davis, N. (2007). Intersectionality, citizenship and contemporary politics of belonging. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 10(4), 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zachos, D. (2006). Roma, egalitarianism and school integration: The case of Flampouro. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 4(2), 262–296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Umeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations