Skip to main content

“Stay Still”: Sewol, a Tale of Fatal Censorship, Fatal Paternalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges of Modernization and Governance in South Korea
  • 749 Accesses

Abstract

Analyzing Korea’s laws and legal systems, this chapter develops a legal-cultural explanation of the Sewol ferry incident and its aftermath that places hierarchy-oriented Korean mentality as a deep cultural root of the problem. It examines the laws and legal systems of the country that are causally related to the beginning, processes and aftermath of the tragedy. Hierarchy interferes with efficient and correct decision-making in disaster situations, as Gladwell points out in Outlier, and most victims of the Sewol ferry sinking suffered from their fatal failure to challenge the completely misinformed order from higher up the hierarchical chain: “Stay Still.” As the Sewol’s victims poignantly demonstrated—with their lives—a fatal consequence resulting from Korea’s hierarchical culture that discourages the masses from challenging the authority of superiors, so does the incident’s aftermath reveal the country’s state paternalism in its liberal deployment of criminal defamation suits. This chapter argues that the legal culture embeds a recent crisis of seditious libel and criminal defamation actions aiming to suppress particular forms of speech: criticisms of the higher chain of the command in a country which is dominated by state paternalism . In doing so, this chapter makes comparisons with and evaluations against an international human rights regime on freedom of speech and the state practices of several major countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/539764.stm.

  2. 2.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Estonia.

  3. 3.

    http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002101095; http://wspaper.org/7_print_popup.php?articleNos=15622%2C15623%2C15625&title=%EC%84%B8%EC%9B%94%ED%98%B8+%EC%B0%B8%EC%82%AC+1%EB%85%84%EC%9D%84+%EB%8F%8C%EC%95%84%EB%B3%B4%EB%A9%B4%EC%84%9C.

  4. 4.

    http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/634965.html%20.

  5. 5.

    See Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Vaughan 1996).

  6. 6.

    Para. 47

  7. 7.

    MP LEE Chun-Seok’s Press Release, October 19, 2009 http://media.daum.net/tvnews/view.html?cateid=100000&newsid=20101006161113668&p=newsis.

  8. 8.

    http://www.article19.org/advocacy/defamationmap/overview.html [no longer available; last accessed on May 30, 2009].

  9. 9.

    Prosecutors’ Office Year Book of 2014, Chapter 6, Pages 926, 966 http://www.spo.go.kr/spo/info/issue/spo_history02.jsp?mode=view&board_no=64&article_no=590945.

  10. 10.

    Courts’ Year Book of 2014, Section on Crimes, Chapter 5, Page 89 http://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/justicesta/JusticestaListAction.work?gubun=10.

  11. 11.

    Prosecutors’ Office Year Book of 2011, Chapter 6, Pages 1048, 1049. http://www.spo.go.kr/spo/info/issue/spo_history02.jsp?mode=view&article_no=518576&pager.offset=0&board_no=64&stype=&sort_year=2011.

  12. 12.

    Courts’ Year Book of 2011, Chapter 5, Pages 874, 875.

  13. 13.

    Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, on his mission to the Republic of Korea (May 6–17, 2010), A/HRC/17/27/Add.2, paras. 25, 89 http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G11/121/34/PDF/G1112134.pdf?OpenElement.

  14. 14.

    참여연대, <국민입막음 소송 보고서> (2015).

  15. 15.

    Special Rapporteur Frank La Rue’s Korea Report, Para. 27 “The Special Rapporteur reiterates that for a statement to be considered defamatory, it must be false, must injure another person’s reputation, and made with malicious intent to cause injury to another individual’s reputation.”

  16. 16.

    General Comment 34, para. 47, “All … penal defamation laws … should include such defences as the defence of truth.”

  17. 17.

    Supreme Court 2004.10.15 Judgment 2004Do3912.

  18. 18.

    Supreme Court 2004.5.28 Judgment 2004Do1497.

  19. 19.

    Council of Europe, “Legal Provisions Concerning Defamation and Insult in Europe” http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/media/doc/dh-mm(2003)006rev_EN.asp.

  20. 20.

    William Roos, Case Comment, NETHERLANDS: COPYRIGHT: RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND PORTRAIT RIGHT, Ent. L.R. 1998, 9(8), N146–147 (Roos 1998).

  21. 21.

    Supreme Court Judgment, March 28, 2013, 2012Do11914.

  22. 22.

    https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2013/11/116_145842.html.

  23. 23.

    http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/politics/2014/03/25/0505000000AKR20140325076451055.HTML.

  24. 24.

    Brigitte Leoni, Tim Radford, Mark Schulman, “Disaster Through a Different Lens: a guide for journalists covering disaster risk reduction” United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2011).

  25. 25.

    Deborah Potter, Sherry Ricchiardi, “Disaster and Crisis Coverage”, International Center for Journalists, p.8 (2002) http://www.icfj.org/sites/default/files/Disaster_Crisis.pdf.

  26. 26.

    http://news.jtbc.joins.com/html/146/NB10471146.html?cloc=jtbc%7Cnews%7Cindex_photo_news.

  27. 27.

    A Statement of 121 Reporters of MBC, May 12, 2014; MBC Reporters’ Association May 13, 2014.

  28. 28.

    여객선세월호 침몰사고 원인분석 결과보고서, 합동수사본부 전문가 자문단.

  29. 29.

    http://m.media.daum.net/m/media/society/newsview/20140503102007922.

  30. 30.

    “더 구할 수 있었는데…” 학생 20여명 살린 용감한 승객들(17일, 고아름 기자) KBS 9시 뉴스

    http://news.kbs.co.kr/news/NewsView.do?SEARCH_NEWS_CODE=2847780&; MBC 뉴스데스크 침몰 순간에도 학생 먼저 구조(17일, 박진준 기자) http://imnews.imbc.com/replay/2014/nwdesk/article/3449691_13490.html.

  31. 31.

    2014년 제27차 방송심의소위원회 회의록, 2014.7.21(월), 오후 3시, 44쪽–51쪽.

  32. 32.

    Article 6 Para. 9 of the Broadcasting Law, http://elaw.klri.re.kr/kor_service/lawView.do?hseq=25243&lang=ENG.

  33. 33.

    김민환(책임)/한진만/윤영철/원용진/임영호/손영준, 방송의 공정성 심의에 대한 연구(방송통신심의위원회 용역보고서), 2008.

  34. 34.

    http://www.koreatimesus.com/korean-court-acquits-woman-of-lying-about-ferry-rescue/.

  35. 35.

    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/12/17/national/crime-legal/seoul-verdict-looms-defamation-trial-ex-sankei-bureau-chief/.

  36. 36.

    February 6, 2016.

  37. 37.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Estonia.

  38. 38.

    Sturcke, James (March 6, 2007). “Herald of sea changes”. The Guardian. Retrieved November 30, 2007.

  39. 39.

    Except where expressly noted, all the data about the Sewol accident are from http://past.media.daum.net/sewolferry/timeline/.

  40. 40.

    합동수사본부 전문가 자문단, <여객선 세월호 침몰 사고 원인분석 결과 보고서>, 2014. 8.12, 4쪽.

  41. 41.

    MBN, “10시17분 마지막 카카오톡. . ‘기다려라 안내방송만. . .’”, 2014.4.28, http://media.daum.net/breakingnews/newsview?newsid=20140428204606930.

  42. 42.

    합동수사본부 전문가 자문단 보고서 117–118쪽.

  43. 43.

    Hankyoreh Shinmun, “Yang On-Yoo Goes Back into the Ship to Rescue Her Classmate”, 2014.6.17 http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/642883.html, Hankyoreh Shinmun, “To Chung Won-Suk, Who Went Back To Rescue His Classmate”, 2014.11.10 http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/663864.html.

  44. 44.

    http://media.daum.net/society/clusterview?newsId=20140420135704851&clusterId=1150909.

  45. 45.

    http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?sc=60700149&year=2014&no=614414.

  46. 46.

    http://dreamlives.tistory.com/964.

  47. 47.

    http://www.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?SCD=JG31&newsid=01279206606084984&DCD=A00703&OutLnkChk=Y.

  48. 48.

    http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html?no=2014042401030243061002.

  49. 49.

    http://nocutnews.co.kr/news/4402478.

  50. 50.

    http://bbs1.agora.media.daum.net/gaia/do/debate/read?bbsId=D003&articleId=5210913&RIGHT_DEBATE=R5.

  51. 51.

    Wikipedia “2007 South Korea Oil Spill”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_South_Korea_oil_spill.

  52. 52.

    Youtube, “태안사태는 조작이다. 2부”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T72_Ki47j1c, Between 5:06 and 6:11.

  53. 53.

    둔재, “유조선에서 유출되는 원유 받기” 2008.01.13 블로그포스팅 http://m.blog.daum.net/imbg77/13656078 (“비록 풍랑이 거셌다고는 하지만 유조선이 침몰한 것도 아니고 멀쩡히 떠 있는 상태인데

    조그만한 구멍 3개를 막는데 어떻게 이틀씩이나 걸렸는지.”

    풍랑이 높을 경우 대형 바지선을 유조선에 댔을 경우 2차 충동사고의 우려가 높으므로 유조선과 부딪치더라도 피해를 끼치지 않을 만큼의 소형 바지선으로 기름을 받은 후 인근의 대형바지선이나 또 다른 유조선으로 펌핑을 하면 가능하지 않았을까….)

  54. 54.

    주간동아, “2008.1.15, http://weekly.donga.com/docs/magazine/weekly/2008/01/14/200801140500009/200801140500009_1.html (“사고 발생 두 시간 만에 해경으로부터 연락을 받았습니다. 태안에 도착한 것은 사고 발생 5시간 만이었죠. 해경이 좀더 큰 배를 제공했더라면, 또는 선주 측이 조금 빨리 작업을 허락했더라면 어땠을지….”) 염형철, “태안기름유출사고와 기업의 사회적 책임”, 태안신문 2008.4.24 (“당시 유조선의 5개 탱크 가운데 1·3·5번 탱크에 생긴 구멍을 첨단 타공(뚫린 구멍을 막는) 기술로 막은 시각은 사건 발생 48시간 뒤인 9일 오전 7시30분. 그러나 이미 1만500kl의 원유가 바다로 흘러나온 뒤였다.)

    http://www.taeannews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=11765 (아쉬운 것은 유조선의 구멍을 48시간이나 방치하면서 흘러나오는 기름을 막지 못했다는 점이다. 유조선의 규모를 고려하지 않은 채 소형어선을 이용해 수리를 시도하다 두 차례나 실패하고 돌아오기를 연속한 탓이었다.”)

  55. 55.

    경향신문, “손놓은 초동대처 하룻밤새 넋놓다. . 피해 왜 커졌나” 2007.12.09 http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=200712091915371&code=940202 (“유조선의 기름 유출 구멍을 신속하게 막지 못한 것도 피해 확산의 주원인이다. 당국은 유조선내 ‘바라스트(선박 균형장치)’로 기름을 응급 이송하면서 7일 낮 12시쯤부터 유출은 더 이상 없다고 발표했다. 하지만 기름은 계속 유출되다 48시간 만인 9일 오전 7시30분에서야 응급 봉쇄작업이 완료됐다.”) ; 문화일보 “엉터리 예측 – 안일한 대응. . . ‘재앙’ 키웠다”, 2007.12.10 http://www.munhwa.com/news/view.html?no=20071210010305242190042 (“기름도 7일 낮 12시부터는 추가 유출이 없을 것이라고 발표했지만 9일 오전 7시30분쯤 1번 탱크에 난 길이 30cm, 폭 3cm의 구멍을 나무로 틀어막은 뒤에야 유출을 막았다.”)

  56. 56.

    연합뉴스 2007-12-17 “유조선장 기지로 ‘6천800kl’ 추가유출 막아”

  57. 57.

    김현근 블로그포스팅 2008.1.8. http://ryum2001.blog.me/140046738077, (“기름유출사건을 되돌아보면. . 인천앞바다에 지천으로 떠 있는 모래채취 바지선이라도 가져다가 쏟아지는 기름을 받았더라면. . . 웬만한 모래바지선 한척이 2–3천톤 정도의 크기이니 많은 양의 기름유출을 감소시켰을 것입니다.”)

  58. 58.

    연합뉴스, 2014.2.15, “’부산 화물선 기름유출’, 해경대원들 온몸 던져 막아”, http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2014/02/15/0200000000AKR20140215060300051.HTML.

  59. 59.

    정대진 Unpublished manuscript.

  60. 60.

    Wikia.com, “대구지하철 화재 참사” http://ko.answers.wikia.com/wiki/%EB%8C%80%EA%B5%AC_%EC%A7%80%ED%95%98%EC%B2%A0_%ED%99%94%EC%9E%AC_%EC%B0%B8%EC%82%AC.

  61. 61.

    전북일보, “대구지하철참사, 기관사 ‘판단 잘못했다’ 과실시인”, 2003.2.21 http://www.jjan.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=84577.

  62. 62.

    동아일보, “대구지하철방화참사 60여명 구한 금호역장 권춘섭씨, 2003.2.20 http://news.donga.com/3/all/20030219/7914510/1.

  63. 63.

    한겨레, “대구 지하철 참사 때도. . .’기다리라’는 방송”, 2014.4.18 http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/ISSUE/124/633398.html.

  64. 64.

    It is amazing that every stakeholder now wished that all the oil would have been better burned in an explosion than pollute the shore.

  65. 65.

    https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%84%B8%EC%9B%94%ED%98%B8_%EC%B9%A8%EB%AA%B0_%EC%82%AC%EA%B3%A0.

  66. 66.

    조선일보, “‘얘들아 올라와’ 아래로 내려간 선생님들”, 2014.5.21, http://premium.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2014/05/21/2014052100258.html.

  67. 67.

    Private conversations.

  68. 68.

    JTBC, “9시23분 방송불가? 동영상이 증언한 선원들 거짓말”, 2014.4.30 http://media.daum.net/breakingnews/newsview?newsid=20140430223813343.

  69. 69.

    경향신문, “해경청장 ‘선내진입’ 지시했지만 경비정은 ‘경사심해’ 불이행”, 2014.5.18 http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?code=940202&artid=201405181832291.

  70. 70.

    경향신문, “몸 마음 눈으로 세월호를 겪은 8인이 말하는 안전”, 2014. 5.12 http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201405112151095&code=940202.

  71. 71.

    장은주, “단 한명의 아이도 포기하지 않는 교육”, 2014.9.30, 경기도교육연구원 심포지엄 < 위기의 한국교육 탈출구는 어디에>.

  72. 72.

    Id.

  73. 73.

    “South Korean cultural values played a role in passengers staying below deck as ferry sank”, 4.18.2014, http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2014/04/18/south-korea-cultural-values-played-a-role-in-passengers-staying-below-deck-as-ferry-sank/.

  74. 74.

    http://www.vice.com/read/stop-blaming-south-koreas-culture-for-last-weeks-ferry-disaster. http://time.com/75742/south-korea-ferry-asian-stereotypes-culture-blaming/.

References

  • Roos, W. (1998). Case comment, Netherlands: Copyright: Right to privacy and portrait right. Entertainment Law Review, 9 (8), N146–N147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, K.S. (2017). “Stay Still”: Sewol, a Tale of Fatal Censorship, Fatal Paternalism. In: Suh, JJ., Kim, M. (eds) Challenges of Modernization and Governance in South Korea. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4023-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4023-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4022-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4023-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics