Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Surgery and Robotic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personalized Management of Gastric Cancer
  • 1068 Accesses

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has become a standard treatment for early-stage gastric cancer. Many studies have demonstrated its safety, efficacy, and the significant advantages resulting from its minimally invasive nature [1, 2]. As the technique developed, laparoscopic surgery has also begun to be widely used in local, advanced gastric cancer treatment [3]. In recent years, the type and resection area in laparoscopic surgery have changed significantly. Moreover, standard procedures have developed from D2 lymph node dissection to digestive tract reconstruction [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kim BS, Yook JH, Choi YB, et al. Comparison of early outcomes of intracorporeal and extracorporeal gastroduodenostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(5):387–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Varela JE, Hiyashi M, Nguyen T, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):837–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Son T, Hyung WJ. Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):727–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aurello P, Sagnotta A, Terrenato I, et al. Oncologic value of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12(3):199–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Haverkamp L, Ruurda JP, Offerhaus GJ, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy in Western European patients with advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;1:110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36(10):2394–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez-Ramos D, Miralles-Tena JM, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for advanced and resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103(3):133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adachi Y, Suematsu T, Shiraishi N, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;229(1):49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehnert T, Buhl K. Techniques of reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91(5):​528–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zou Z, Mou T, Deng Z, et al. Exploration of digestive tract reconstruction with totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014;17(8):844–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smolarek S, Salih A, Kazanowski M, et al. Laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer—operative technique. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015;10(1):133–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Hokita S, et al. Postoperative long-term evaluation of interposition reconstruction compared with Roux-en-Y after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):247–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitagami H, Morimoto M, Nakamura K, et al. Technique of Roux-en-Y reconstruction using overlap method after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 100 consecutively successful cases. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):4086–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JH, Yom CK, Han HS. Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1759–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Viñuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):446–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pak KH, Hyung WJ, Son T, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of 714 consecutive laparoscopic gastrectomies for gastric cancer: results from the 7-year experience of a single institute. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, et al. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):68–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sato H, Shimada M, Kurita N, et al. Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2240–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura K, Katai H, Mizusawa J, et al. A phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric Cancer (JCOG0912). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43(3):324–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01). J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84(2):123–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu Y, Ying M, Huang C, et al. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort study from China. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(7):2048–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim HI, Hur H, Kim YN, et al. Standardization of D2 lymphadenectomy and surgical quality control (KLASS-02-QC): a prospective, observational, multicenter study [NCT01283893]. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:209. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Küper MA, Eisner F, Königsrainer A, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for benign and malign diseases of the digestive system: indications, limitations, and evidence. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(17):4883–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee JH, Park DJ, Kim YH, et al. Clinical implementations of preoperative computed tomography lymphography in gastric cancer: a comparison with dual tracer methods in sentinel node navigation surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(7):2296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Takagi Y, et al. Sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter trial in Japan. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(29):3704–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tangoku A, Seike J, Nakano K, et al. Current status of sentinel lymph node navigation surgery in breast and gastrointestinal tract. J Med Invest. 2007;54(1–2):1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitsumori N, Nimura H, Takahashi N, et al. Sentinel lymph node navigation surgery for early stage gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(19):5685–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tani T, Sonoda H, Tani M. Sentinel lymph node navigation surgery for gastric cancer: does it really benefit the patient. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(10):2894–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Miyashiro I, Hiratsuka M, Sasako M, et al. High false-negative proportion of intraoperative histological examination as a serious problem for clinical application of sentinel node biopsy for early gastric cancer: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group multicenter trial JCOG0302. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(2):316–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Park JY, Ryu KW, Eom BW, et al. Proposal of the surgical options for primary tumor control during sentinel node navigation surgery based on the discrepancy between preoperative and postoperative early gastric cancer diagnoses. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(4):1123–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, et al. Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shen WS, Xi HQ, Chen L, et al. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2795–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marano A, Choi YY, Hyung WJ, et al. Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Gastric Cancer. 2013;13(3):136–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hur H, Kim JY, Cho YK, et al. Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(8):693–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(3):610–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, et al. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):927–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Chen P, et al. Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(38):6427–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, et al. Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(3):673–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Köckerling F. Robotic vs. standard laparoscopic technique—what is better. Front Surg. 2014;1(15):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kim HJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2013;100(12):1566–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Parisi A, Trastulli S, Ricci F, et al. Robotic double-loop reconstruction method following total gastrectomy. Endoscopy. 2016;48(1):55–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenxian Guan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, M., Guan, W. (2017). Laparoscopic Surgery and Robotic Surgery. In: Wei, J., Liu, B. (eds) Personalized Management of Gastric Cancer. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3978-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3978-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3977-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3978-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics