Skip to main content

Research Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 868 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a detailed account of the research design of The Studying the Effectiveness of Teacher Education (SETE) project, a 4-year longitudinal study investigating newly graduated teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of the effectiveness of teacher education in preparing teachers for the variety of Australian school settings in which they begin their teaching careers. The project aimed to provide an evidentiary basis for policy decisions regarding teacher education and beginning teaching, and to inform state-based professional regulatory authorities in their role of accrediting teacher education programs and universities in the design and delivery of teacher education programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Union. (2009). New educators survey 2008. Results and report. Retrieved from http://www.aeufederal.org.au/Publications/2009/Nesurvey08res.pdf

  • Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). (2006). Survey of final year teacher education students, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.setearc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/FinalYrTeachStudentsSurveyReport.pdf

  • Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Carlton, Victoria: Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Battram, A. (1999). Navigating complexity. London: The Industrial Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijaard, D., Verloop, N. & Vermunt, J. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 749–764. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8.

  • Berry, B., Daughtrey, A., & Wieder, A. (2010). Teacher effectiveness: The conditions that matter most and a look to the future. Carrboro, NC: The Center for Teaching Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Michelli, N., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). Complex by design: Investigating pathways into teaching in New York City schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caracelli, V. (2006). Enhancing the policy process through the use of ethnography and other study frameworks: A mixed methods strategy. Research in the Schools, 13, 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi-Kin Lee, J. & Day, C. (Eds.). (2016). Quality and change in teacher education: Western and Chinese perspectives. Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Power, C. (2010). New directions for teacher preparation. Educational Leadership, 67(8), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L. & Aitken, G., (2014). The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., McQuillan, P., Mitchell, K., Gahlsdorf Terrell, D., Barnett, J., D’Souza, L., et al. (2012). A longitudinal study of teaching practice and early career decisions: A cautionary tale. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 844–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. & Kyriakidēs, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., Klassen, A., Plano Clark, V., & Smith, K. (2011). Best practice for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda, MD: Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, R. (2001). Chaos, complexity and the study of education communities. Paper presented to the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, 13–15 September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into teaching, learning and research. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Kingston, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, W. (2012). Complexity and the culture of curriculum complicity. An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 9(1), 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, N. (2012). Complexity, complexity reduction, and ‘methodological borrowing’ in educational inquiry. Complicity: An International Journal Of Complexity and Education, 9(1), 41–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia, (2011). Australian graduate survey. Retrieved from http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/research/surveys/australiangraduatesurvey

  • Hetherington, L. (2013). Complexity thinking and methodology: The potential of ‘complex case study’. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 10(1/2), 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A. & Kleinhenz, E. (2004). Teacher education courses in Victoria: Perceptions of their effectiveness and factors affecting their impact. Victorian Institute of Teaching Future Teachers Project. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/teacher_education/4

  • Klieme, E. & Vieluf, S. (2009). Teaching practices, teachers’ beliefs and attitudes. In Indicators and Analysis Division of the OECD Directorate for Education (Ed.), Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS (pp. 87–124). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, E. & Poom-Valickis, K. (2013). Beliefs about teaching: Persistent or malleable? A longitudinal study of prospective student teachers’ beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 104–113. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.004.

  • Louden, W., Heldsinger, S., House, H., Humphry, S. & Fitzgerald, D. (2010). Learning from teacher education: The impact of teacher education on knowledge of literacy and mathematics teaching. Study of effective teacher education: progress report 2. Canberra: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D., Dixon, M., Kline, J., Moss, J & Ludecke, M. (2014). The graduate teacher workforce: Shaping teacher quality, paper 3, Invited keynote symposium. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Institute of Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConney, A., Price, Anne, & Woods-McConney, A.. (2012). Fast track teacher education: A review of the research literature on Teach For All schemes. Perth: Centre for Learning Change and Development, Murdoch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, P., Kos, J., Walker, M., Hong, J., & Owen, S. (2008). Staff in Australia’s schools 2007. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, P., Rowley, G., Weldon, P. R., & Murphy, M. (2011). Staff in Australia’s schools 2010. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Menter, I., Hulme, M., Elliot, D., & Lewin, J. with Baumfield, V., Britton, A., Carroll, M., Livingston, K., McCulloch, M., McQueen, I., Patrick, F., Townsend, T. (2010). Literature review on teacher education in the 21st century by education analytical services. Schools Research, Scottish Government, Victoria Quay, Edinburgh, EH6 6QQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mockler, N. (2013). The slippery slope to efficiency? An Australian perspective on school/university partnerships for teacher professional learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 273–289. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.818103.

  • Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, K. (2006). Complexity theory and education (pp. 1–11). APERA Conference 2006 28–30 November 2006, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, L., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.) (2010), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H. (2012). Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2) 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngblood, M. (1997). Life at the edge of chaos. Dallas, TX: Perceval Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Mayer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayer, D. et al. (2017). Research Approach. In: Studying the Effectiveness of Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3929-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3929-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3928-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3929-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics