Extended Four-Step Travel Demand Forecasting Model for Urban Planning

  • Akash Agrawal
  • Sandeep S Udmale
  • Vijay K. Sambhe
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 10)


For years, the traditional four-step travel demand forecasting model has helped the policy makers for making decisions regarding transportation programs and projects for metropolitan regions. This traditional model predicts the number of vehicles of each mode of transportation between the traffic analysis zones (TAZs) over a period of time. Although this model does not suggest a suitable region where transportation project can be deployed. Therefore, this paper extends one more step to traditional four-step model for suggesting the zones which are in higher need of a highway transportation program. The severity of traffic load is the basis for results of the added step.


Urban planning Travel demand forecasting Mathematical model Project region estimation 


  1. 1.
    Bureau of Transportation Statistics National Transportation Library,
  2. 2.
    National Cooperative Highway Research Program: Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques. Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. (2012).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Yao, H. Guan and H. Yan: Trip generation model based on destination attractiveness. Tsinghua Science and Technology 13, 632–635 (2008).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Liu and D. Hu: A forecasting method of trip generation based on land classification combined with OD matrix estimation. In: 7th Advanced Forum on Transportation of China (AFTC 2011), pp. 1–4. Beijing (2011).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wen Huiying and Zhang Wenbiao: A new trip distribution model based on potential theory. In: International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (MACE), pp. 717–720. Wuhan, China (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Goel and A. K. Sinha: ANFIS Based Trip Distribution model for Delhi Urban Area. In: 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), pp. 453–457. New Delhi, India (2015).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Wan, J. Chen and M. Zheng: The Impact of Land Use and Traffic Resources Supply on Commute Mode Choice. In: Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), pp. 1010–1013. Changsha, Hunan (2009).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    X. Li, Chunfu Shao and Liya Yang: Simultaneous estimation of residential, workplace location and travel mode choice based on Nested Logit model. In: Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), pp. 1725–1729. Yantai, Shandong (2010).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Hu, W. Jifeng, J. Yulin and Y. Rui: Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Coupling for Urban Travel Demand and Land Use. In: International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing (ICOIP), pp. 251–254. Haiko (2010).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Chen and Q. P. Yan: Trip assignment model for urban traffic system based on network equilibrium. In: International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (MACE), pp. 4680–4683. Wuhan (2010).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Hajbabaie and R. F. Benekohal: A Program for Simultaneous Network Signal Timing Optimization and Traffic Assignment. In: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16, 2573–2586 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmed, B.: The Traditional Four Steps Transportation Modeling Using Simplified Transport Network: A Case Study of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. IJASETR 1(1) (2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akash Agrawal
    • 1
  • Sandeep S Udmale
    • 1
  • Vijay K. Sambhe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Engineering and Information TechnologyVeermata Jijabai Technological InstituteMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations