Advertisement

Properties, Principles, and Metrics in Transportation CPS

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

During the past decades, we have witnessed tremendous advancements in the field of wireless communications, while supporting a wide range of applications. Nevertheless, wireless access has also been shifted towards transportation research and development centers. The integration of embedded devices to transverse heterogeneity into homogeneity, cyber-physical systems (CPS) have been introduced as a subset of the Internet of things (IoT). For example, sensors/actuator systems became responsive to the physical world by enabling real-time control emanating from conventional embedded systems also known as CPS. Likewise, we have several onboard sensors installed inside the vehicles, responsible for sensing different activities within the vehicle and its surroundings such as temperature, intruder detection, and so on. In addition to the general applications for CPS, we have the vehicular cyber-physical systems (VCPS) that is not a new concept. For now, VCPS may refer to a wide range of transportation management systems that are heavily integrated and should be highly accurate, real-time, and efficient. This chapter provides readers with the details of the term “VCPS” followed by the historical overview of this new emerging field including research challenges and future aspects of the VCPS.

Keywords

CPS Vehicular networks Future research Architectures 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed, S. H., Kim, G., & Kim, D. (2013, November). Cyber Physical System: Architecture, applications and research challenges. In Wireless Days (WD), 2013 IFIP (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broy, M., Kruger, I. H., Pretschner, A., & Salzmann, C. (2007). Engineering automotive software. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(2), 356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broy, M. (2005, July). Automotive software and systems engineering. In Proceedings. Third ACM and IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design, 2005. MEMOCODE’05. (pp. 143–149). IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abid, H., Phuong, L. T. T., Wang, J., Lee, S., & Qaisar, S. (2011, October). V-Cloud: vehicular cyber-physical systems and cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (p. 165). ACM.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed, S.H., Bouk, S.H., Kim, D. & Sarkar, M., (2015). Cyber-physical systems: Basics and fundamentals. In Cyber-Physical System Design with Sensor Networking Technologies, p. 21.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korkmaz, G., Ekici, E., & Özgüner, F. (2006). A cross-layer multihop data delivery protocol with fairness guarantees for vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 55(3), 865–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kenney, J. B. (2011). Dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) standards in the United States. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(7), 1162–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benslimane, A., Taleb, T., & Sivaraj, R. (2011). Dynamic clustering-based adaptive mobile gateway management in integrated VANET—3G heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(3), 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ganti, R. K., Ye, F., & Lei, H. (2011). Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(11), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ran, B., Jin, P. J., Boyce, D., Qiu, T. Z., & Cheng, Y. (2012). Perspectives on future transportation research: impact of intelligent transportation system technologies on next-generation transportation modeling. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(4), 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saad, W., Han, Z., Hjørungnes, A., Niyato, D., & Hossain, E. (2011). Coalition formation games for distributed cooperation among roadside units in vehicular networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 29(1), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaworski, P., Edwards, T., Moore, J., & Burnham, K. (2011, October). Cloud computing concept for intelligent transportation systems. In 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (pp. 391–936). IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, Z., Chen, C., & Wang, K. I. (2011). Cloud computing for agent-based urban transportation systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(1), 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poovendran, R. A. D. H. A. (2010). Cyber–physical systems: Close encounters between two parallel worlds [point of view]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(8), 1363–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008). MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51(1), 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simmon, E., Kim, K. S., Subrahmanian, E., Lee, R., De Vaulx, F., Murakami, Y., et al. (2013, August). A vision of cyber-physical cloud computing for smart networked systems. NIST.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whaiduzzaman, M., Sookhak, M., Gani, A., & Buyya, R. (2014, June). Elastic infrastructure to support computing clouds for large-scale cyber-physical systems. In 2014 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Object/Component/Service-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC) (pp. 56–63). IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Whaiduzzaman, M., Sookhak, M., Gani, A., & Buyya, R. (2014). A survey on vehicular cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 40, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He, W., Yan, G., & Da Xu, L. (2014). Developing vehicular data cloud services in the IoT environment. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1587–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yan, G., Wen, D., Olariu, S., & Weigle, M. C. (2013). Security challenges in vehicular cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 14(1), 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wan, J., Zhang, D., Zhao, S., Yang, L., & Lloret, J. (2014). Context-aware vehicular cyber-physical systems with cloud support: architecture, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(8), 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gerla, M., Lee, E. K., Pau, G., & Lee, U. (2014, March). Internet of vehicles: From intelligent grid to autonomous cars and vehicular clouds. In 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) (pp. 241–246). IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bakar, K. A., Ghafoor, K. Z., Mohammed, M. A., Sadiq, A. S., & Lloret, J. (2013). Vehicular cloud computing: trends and challenges. Mobile Networks and Cloud Computing Convergence for Progressive Services and Applications, 262.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hussain, R., Son, J., Eun, H., Kim, S., & Oh, H. (2012, December). Rethinking vehicular communications: Merging VANET with cloud computing. In 2012 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom) (pp. 606–609). IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dinh, H. T., Lee, C., Niyato, D., & Wang, P. (2013). A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 13(18), 1587–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumar, K., & Lu, Y. H. (2010). Cloud computing for mobile users: Can offloading computation save energy? Computer, 43(4), 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fernando, N., Loke, S. W., & Rahayu, W. (2013). Mobile cloud computing: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(1), 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations