Advertisement

Groundwater Availability of Northern and Southern Bank Aquifers of the Middle Ganga Plain, India

  • Dipankar SahaEmail author
  • S. N. Dwivedi
Chapter
Part of the Springer Hydrogeology book series (SPRINGERHYDRO)

Abstract

The Gangetic Plain covering ~0.25 million km2 is the primary repository of groundwater in India and is also home to nearly one-third of the ~27 million wells in the country, catering the irrigation sector. The Middle Ganga Plain (MGP) occupying the central part of the Gangetic Plains represents an active depositional basin and represents the thickest sequences of Quaternary sediments in India except the Bengal Basin. The fluvio-lacustrine deposits of MGP have been laid over northerly dipping Precambrian basement. The present paper examines the hydrogeological framework, aquifer characteristics, groundwater flow regime and development potential in two nearly placed segments in MGP; one at the northern bank of the Ganga, occupying southern fringe area of Gandak fan, and the other on the southern bank, located on the northern fringe of the Son fan, a prominent feature of the SGP. The northern segment represents an intensely cultivated area while the southern one is characterized by a wide array of land use, ranging from the urban settlement (Patna town, Population 2.7 million) in the eastern part, semi-urban settlement in the middle and north-western part and typical cultivated areas in the southern part. The aquifers and groundwater regime in the northern and the southern banks of the River Ganga are assessed and measures for aquifer management in this highly groundwater-dependent region are suggested.

Keywords

Middle Ganga plain Groundwater Hydrogeology Aquifer characteristics Irrigation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their deep sense of gratitude to the Chairman, CGWB, for his unstinted help and support. Thanks are also due to colleagues of CGWB for their constructive suggestions and discussions during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Acharya SK (2004) Arsenic trends in groundwater from quaternary alluvium in Ganga plain and Bengal basin, Indian subcontinent. Insights into influences of stratigraphy. Gondwana Res 8:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chakroborty C, Chattopadhyay GS (2001) Quaternary geology of South Ganga Plain in Bihar. Indian Miner 55(3 and 4):133–142Google Scholar
  3. Chakraborty D, Mukherjee SC, Pati S, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Lodh D, Chanda CR, Chakraborty AK (2003) Arsenic groundwater contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India: a future danger? Environ Health Perspect 111:1194–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Custodio E (2002) Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeol J 10:254–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacob CE (1950) Flow of groundwater. In: Rouse H (ed) Engineering hydraulics. Wiley, New York, pp 321–386Google Scholar
  6. Kalf FRP, Wooley DR (2005) Applicability and methodology of determining sustainable yield in groundwater systems. J Hydrol 13:295–312Google Scholar
  7. Maitra MK, Ghose NC (1992) Groundwater management—an application. Ashish Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. Mukherjee A (2018) Groundwater of South Asia. Springer Nature, Singapore. ISBN 978-981-10-3888-4Google Scholar
  9. Mukherjee A, Scanlon BR, Fryar AE, Saha D, Ghosh A, Chowdhuri S, Mishra R (2012) Solute chemistry and arsenic fate in aquifers between the Himalayan foothills and Indian craton (including central Gangetic plain): influence of geology and geomorphology. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 90:283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mukherjee A, Saha D, Harvey CF, Taylor RG, Ahmed KM, Bhanja SN (2015) Groundwater systems of the Indian sub-continent. J Hydrol Reg Stud. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.03.005Google Scholar
  11. Saha D (2009) Arsenic groundwater contamination in parts of middle Ganga plain, Bihar. Curr Sci 97(6)Google Scholar
  12. Saha D, Alam F (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and pesticide DRASTIC models in intense agriculture area of the Gangetic plains, India. Environ Monit Assess.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4041-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saha D, Sahu S (2015) A decade of investigations on groundwater arsenic contamination in Middle Ganga Plain, India. Environ Geochem Health.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-015-9730-z
  14. Saha D, Upadhyay S, Dhar YR, Singh R (2007) The aquifer system and evaluation of its hydraulic parameters in parts of South Ganga Plain, Bihar, India. J Geol Soc India 69:1031–1041Google Scholar
  15. Saha D, Dhar YR, Vittala SS (2009a) Delineation of groundwater development potential zones in parts of marginal Ganga Alluvial Plain in South Bihar, Eastern India. Environ Monit Assess.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0937-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saha D, Sarangam H, Diwedi SN, Bhartariya KJ (2009b) Evaluation of hydrochemical processes in the arsenic contaminated alluvial aquifers in parts of Mid-Ganga basin, Bihar, India. Environ Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0392-y
  17. Saha D, Sahu S, Chandra PC (2010) Arsenic-safe alternate aquifers and their hydraulic characteristics in contaminated areas of Middle Ganga Plain, Eastern India. Environ Monit Assess.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1535-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saha D, Sinha UK, Dwivedi SN (2011) Characterization of recharge processes in shallow and deeper aquifers using isotopic signatures and geochemical behavior of groundwater in an arsenic-enriched part of the Ganga Plain. Appl Geochem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saha D, Dwivedi SN, Roy GK, Reddy DV (2013a) Isotope-based investigation on the groundwater flow and recharge mechanism in a hard-rock aquifer system: the case of Ranchi urban area, India. Hydrogeol J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-0974-3
  20. Saha D, Dwivedi SN, Singh RK (2013b) Aquifer system response to intensive pumping in urban areas of the Gangetic plains, India: the case study of Patna Urban area. Environ Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2577-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sahu S, Saha D (2014a) Correlation between stratigraphy, flood plain geomorphology and arsenic distribution in groundwater of in Middle Ganga Plain, Bihar, India. Environ Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3637-3
  22. Sahu S, Saha D (2014b) Geomorphologic, stratigraphic and sedimentologic evidences of tectonic activity in Sone-Ganga alluvial tract in Middle Ganga Plain, India. J Earth Syst Sci 123(6):1335–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sahu S, Saha D (2016) Empirical methods and estimation of hydraulic conductivity of fluvial aquifers. Environ Eng Geosci XXII(4):319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh IB (2001) Proxy records of neotectonics, climate changes and anthropogenic activity in Late Quaternary of Ganga plain. In: National symposium on role of earth sciences in integrated development and related societal issues, vol 21. Geological Survey of India Special Publication, pp 161–172Google Scholar
  25. Singh IB (2004) Late quaternary history of the Ganga Plain. J Geol Soc India 64:431–454Google Scholar
  26. Sinha R (2005) Why do Gangetic rivers aggrade or degrade? Curr Sci 89(5):836–840Google Scholar
  27. Sinha R, Tandon SK, Gibling MR, Bhattachargee PS, Dasgupta AS (2005) Late quaternary geology and alluvial stratigraphy of the Ganga basin. Himalayan Geol 26(1):223–240Google Scholar
  28. Walton WC (1962) Selected analytical methods for well and aquifer evaluation. Ill State Water Surv Bull 49:81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Ground Water BoardFaridabadIndia

Personalised recommendations