Advertisement

Model Impact of Climate Change on the Groundwater Flow and Salinity Encroachment in the Coastal Areas of Bangladesh

  • Anwar Zahid
  • A. F. M. Afzal Hossain
  • Gautam C. Mridha
  • M. Rezaul Hasan
  • Kamrul Islam
  • M. Salah Uddin Abbassi
Chapter
Part of the Springer Hydrogeology book series (SPRINGERHYDRO)

Abstract

The coastal population of Bangladesh has already been suffering from the salinity encroachment both in groundwater and surface water regime. Reduced river discharge, coastal surges, shrimp farming, lowering of groundwater table due to dry season irrigation in a large part of the country accelerate the rate of saline water distribution. In addition, sea level rise, due to the impact of climate change, may contribute to salinity encroachment on coastal freshwater resources, particularly in the shallow alluvial aquifers. Though the groundwater table is within 2–5 m below ground surface, availability of fresh and safe water in the coast is very limited in upper aquifers because of the arsenic contamination and water salinity. For the coastal population, deep (>250 m) tube wells are the main source of drinking water and irrigation water supply is mostly restricted to surface water including rainwater. In monsoon, freshwater pockets are available at the shallow depth (<8 m) from seasonal precipitation but mostly turn to brackish condition during dry period. Therefore, assessment and monitoring of development stress and probable impact of climate change on freshwater resource are utmost important. The main purpose of the study is to assess the impact of climate change and development stresses on the availability of fresh water resources in the coastal area. For that purpose, integrated hydrological model has been prepared describing the subsurface condition both the saturated and unsaturated zone together with the influence of various water components of the hydrological cycle. Groundwater salinity models are developed to simulate salinity transport in the sea, river and through the porous medium of aquifer for a range of existing and possible future conditions. It has been seen from the simulation result of the model that under climate change condition during the month of March and April, the salinity level is highest for all river system within the study area and significant during period from December to June. The climate change scenario illustrates that the groundwater level increases within the range of 0.6–0.8 m under climate change scenario. Movement of salinity is found insignificant from the river to the aquifer. Major rivers in the south central coast there is a considerable interaction between surface water and groundwater due to the tidal effect. On the other hand, there is negligible interaction between the aquifer and adjacent river in the south-eastern coastal plain.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), Bangladesh Climate Change Trust (BCCT) and Institute of Water Modelling (IWM) are highly acknowledged for supporting the research on assessment of coastal water resources. Professionals and officials involved in the project activities are also acknowledged for their valuable contribution.

References

  1. Acharyya SK, Chakraborty P, Lahiri S, Raymahashay BC, Guha S, Bhowmik A (1999) Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta. Nature 401:545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal PK, Basu AR, Kulkarni KM, Froehlich K, Tarafdar SA, Ali M, Ahmed N, Hussain A, Rahman M, Ahmed SR (2000) A report on isotope hydrology of groundwater in Bangladesh: implications for characterization and mitigation of arsenic in groundwater. Work performed within an IAEA–TC project (BGD/8/016), 61pGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali A (1996) Vulnerability of Bangladesh to climate change and sea level rise through tropical cyclones and storm surges. Water Air Soil Pollut 92:171–9Google Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya P, Chatterjee D, Jacks G (1997) Occurrence of arsenic contaminated groundwater in alluvial aquifers from the delta plains, eastern India: options for safe drinking water supply. Water Resour Dev 13:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BWDB (2013) Establishment of monitoring network and mathematical model study to assess saline water intrusion in groundwater in the coastal area of Bangladesh due to climate change. Final report, Bangladesh Water Development Board and Institute of Water Modelling, 2500pGoogle Scholar
  6. BWDB-UNDP (1982) Groundwater survey: the hydrogeological conditions of Bangladesh. UNDP technical report DP/UN/BGD-74-009/1, 113pGoogle Scholar
  7. DPHE-BGS (1999) Groundwater studies for arsenic contamination in Bangladesh. Final report, rapid investigation phase. Department of Public Health Engineering, Government of Bangladesh. Mott MacDonald and British Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  8. DPHE-BGS (2001) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. British Geological Survey and Department of Public Health Engineering, Govt. of Bangladesh; Technical Report, WC/00/19Google Scholar
  9. DPHE-DANIDA (2001) Hydrogeology summary report. Department of Public Health Engineering–Danish International Development Water Supply and Sanitation Components, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, 129pGoogle Scholar
  10. Harun-ur-Rashid M, Islam MS (2007) Adaptation to climate change for sustainable development of Bangladesh agriculture. Presentation at third session of the Technical Committee of the Asian and Pacific Center for Agricultural Engineering and Machinery (APCAEM), November 20–21, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2008) Climate change and water, Technical paper VI, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, WMO, UNEP, 200pGoogle Scholar
  12. Michael HA, Voss CI (2008) Evaluation of the sustainability of deep groundwater as an arsenic-safe resource in the Bengal Basin. PNAS 105(25):8531–8536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael HA, Voss CI (2009) Controls on groundwater flow in the Bengal Basin of India and Bangladesh: regional modeling analysis. Hydrogeol J 17:1561–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MPO (1987) Technical report no. 5, the groundwater resource and its availability for development, Ministry of Irrigation and Flood Control, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  15. Nickson R, McArthur J, Burgess W, Ahmed KM, Ravenscroft P, Rahman M (1998) Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater. Nature 395:338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ravenscroft P (2003) Overview of the hydrogeology of Bangladesh. In: Atiq Rahman A, Revenscroft P (eds) Groundwater resources development in Bangladesh: background to the arsenic crisis, agricultural potential and the environment. The University Press Limited, Bangladesh, pp 43–86Google Scholar
  17. Ravenscroft P, McArthur JM (2004) Mechanism of regional pollution of groundwater by Boron: the examples of Bangladesh and Michigan, USA. Appl Geochem 19:1413–1430Google Scholar
  18. Ravenscroft P, McArthur JM, Hoque BA (2001) Geochemical and palaeohydrological controls on pollution of groundwater by arsenic. In: Chappell WR, Abernathy CO, Calderon RL (eds) Arsenic exposure and health effects, IV edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 53–77Google Scholar
  19. Van Geen A, Zheng Y, Versteeg R, Stute M, Horneman A, Dhar R, Steckler M, Gelman A, Small C, Ahsan H, Graziano JH, Hussain I, Ahmed KM (2003) Spacial variability of arsenic in 6000 tubewells in a 25 km2 area of Bangladesh. Water Resour Res 39(art no 1140)Google Scholar
  20. World Bank-USGS (2010) Implications of climate change for fresh groundwater resources in coastal aquifers in Bangladesh. The World Bank, South Asia Region, Sustainable Development Department, 105pGoogle Scholar
  21. Yan X-P, Kerrich R, Hendry MJ (2000) Distribution of arsenic (3), arsenic (5) and total inorganic arsenic in pore waters from a thick till and clay rich aquitard sequence, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:2637–2648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zahid A, Hassan MQ, Balke, K-D, Flegr M, Clark DW (2008) Groundwater chemistry and occurrence of arsenic in the Meghna floodplain aquifer, southeastern Bangladesh. J Environ Geol 54:1247–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zahid A, Hassan MQ, Breit GN, Balke KD, Flegr M (2009a) Accumulations of iron and arsenic in the Chandina Alluvium of the lower delta plain, southeastern Bangladesh. J Environ Geochem Health 31:69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zahid A, Hassan MQ, Imes JL, Clark DW (2009b) Hydraulic characterization of aquifer(s) and pump test data analysis of deep aquifer in the arsenic affected Meghna river floodplain of Bangladesh. Environ Res J 3(2/3):325–355Google Scholar
  25. Zahid A, Jahan K, Ali MH, Ahmed N, Islam MK, Rahman A (2013) Distribution of groundwater salinity and its seasonal variability in the coastal aquifers of Bengal Delta. In: Zahid A, Hassan MQ, Islam R, Samad QA, Khan MS, Haque R (eds) Impact of climate change on socio-economic conditions of Bangladesh. German Academic Exchange Service, German Development Cooperation, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and Alumni Association of German Universities in Bangladesh, pp 170–193Google Scholar
  26. Zahid A, Hassan MQ, Ahmed KMU (2015) Simulation of Flowpaths and travel time of groundwater through arsenic contaminated zone in the multi-layered aquifer system of Bengal Basin. J Environ Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3447-7

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anwar Zahid
    • 1
    • 3
  • A. F. M. Afzal Hossain
    • 2
  • Gautam C. Mridha
    • 2
  • M. Rezaul Hasan
    • 2
  • Kamrul Islam
    • 2
  • M. Salah Uddin Abbassi
    • 3
  1. 1.Directorate of Ground Water HydrologyBangladesh Water Development BoardDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Institute of Water Modelling (IWM)DhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.Center for Water and Environment (CWE)DhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations