Advancement in Greenhouse Drying System

  • Anil Kumar
  • Harsh Deep
  • Om PrakashEmail author
  • O. V. Ekechukwu
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


Greenhouses are extensively glazed (typically of glass or plastic) buildings which are thermally conditioned within desired range, used for cultivating tender plants or growing plants out of season: short-wavelength visible light passes through the transparent glazing and is absorbed by interior surfaces which heat up and emit long-wave infrared radiation. Air warmed by the heat emitted from warmed interior surfaces is retained within the enclosure by the roof and walls. Greenhouse dryers are essentially modified greenhouses. They are equipped with vents sized and positioned appropriately to control the airflow. Practically realized greenhouse dryers are typically of the integral- or direct-type solar dryers and sometimes of the mixed mode. They are predominantly passive and in some cases active. Comprehensive description and application of the greenhouse as a dryer is present in this chapter.


Greenhouse dryer Greenhouse effect Passive mode Active mode Direct mode Indirect mode Mixed mode 


  1. Abdelhamid F, Sami K, Chakib K, Mohamed M, Abdelhamid F, Ali B (2004) Validation of a pepper drying model in a polyethylene tunnel greenhouse. Int J Therm Sci 43:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bala BK, Mondol MRRA, Biswas BK, Das Chowdury BL, Janjai S (2003) Solar drying of pineapple using solar tunnel drier. Renew Energy 28:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnwal P, Tiwari GN (2008) Grape drying by using hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PV/T) greenhouse dryer: an experimental study. Sol Energy 82:1131–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berrouga F, Lakhal EK, Omari M El, Faraji M, Qarnia H El (2011) Thermal performance of a greenhouse with a phase change material north wall. Energ Buildings 43:3027–3035.Google Scholar
  5. Cakmakçi R, Dönmez F, Aydın A, Şahin F (2006) Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 38(6):1482–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chauhan PS, Kumar A, Tekasakul P (2015) Applications of software in solar drying systems: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:1326–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chauhan PS, Kumar A (2016a) Performance analysis of greenhouse dryer by using insulated north-wall under natural convection mode. Energy Reports 2:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chauhan PS, Kumar A (2016b) Heat transfer analysis of north wall insulated greenhouse dryer under natural convection mode. Energy. In PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Condori M, Saravia L (1998) The performance of forced convection greenhouse driers. Renew Energy 13(4):453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Condori M, Saravia L (2003) Analytical model for the performance of the tunnel-type greenhouse drier. Renew Energy 28:467–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Condori M, Echazu R, Saravia L (2001) Solar drying of sweet pepper and garlic using the tunnel greenhouse drier. Renew Energy 22:447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekechukwua OV, Norton B (1999) Review of solar-energy drying systems II: an overview of solar drying technology. Energy Convers Manag 40:615–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ELkhadraoui A, Kooli S, Hamdi I, Farhat A (2015) Experimental investigation and economic evaluation of a new mixed-mode solar greenhouse dryer for drying of red pepper and grape. Renew Energy 77:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghosal MK, Tiwari GN (2004) Mathematical modelling for greenhouse heating by using thermal curtain and geothermal energy. Sol Energy 76:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta R, Tiwari GN (2004) Effect of latitude on weighted solar fraction of north partition wall for various shapes of solarium. Build Environ 39:547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta R, Tiwari GN (2005) Modeling of energy distribution inside greenhouse using concept of solar fraction with and without reflecting surface on north wall. Build Environ 40:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta R, Tiwari GN, Kumar A, Gupta Y (2012) Calculation of total solar fraction for different orientation of greenhouse using 3d-shadow analysis in auto-CAD. Energ Buildings 47:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jain D (2005) Modeling the performance of greenhouse with packed bed thermal storage on crop drying application. J Food Eng 71:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jain D, Tiwari GN (2004) Effect of greenhouse on crop drying under natural and forced convection I: evaluation of convective mass transfer coefficient. Energy Convers Manag 455:765–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janjai S, Bala BK (2012) Solar drying technology. Food Eng Rev 4:16–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Janjai S, Lamlert N, Intawee P, Mahayothee B, Bala BK, Nagle M, Muller J (2009) Experimental and simulated performance of A PV-ventilated solar greenhouse dryer for drying of peeled longan and banana. Sol Energy 83:1550–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janjai S, Poolsak I, Jinda K, Chanoke S, Vathsana K (2011) A large-scale solar greenhouse dryer using polycarbonate cover: modeling and testing in a tropical environment of lao people’s democratic republic. Renew Energy 36:1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar A, Tiwari GN (2006a) Thermal modeling and parametric study of a forced convection greenhouse drying system for jaggery: an experimental validation. Int J Agric Res 1(3):265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar A, Tiwari GN (2006b) Effect of shapes and size on convective mass transfer coefficient during greenhouse drying (GHD) of jaggery. J Food Eng 73:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar A, Tiwari GN (2007) Effect of mass on convective mass transfer coefficient during open sun and greenhouse drying of onion flakes. J Food Eng 79:1337–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar A, Tiwari GN, Kumar S, Pandey M (2006) Role of greenhouse technology in agricultural engineering. Int J Agric Res 1:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar A, Prakash O, Kaviti A, Tomar A (2013) Experimental analysis of greenhouse dryer in no-load condition. J Environ Res Develop 7(4):1399–1406Google Scholar
  28. Kumar A, Singh R, Prakash O, Ashutosh (2014) Review on global solar drying status. Agric Eng Int CIGR 16(4):161–177Google Scholar
  29. Loannou N (2000) Soil solarization as a substitute for methyl bromide fumigation in greenhouse tomato production in Cyprus. Phytoparasitica 28(3):248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mujumdar AS (2008) “Guide to industrial drying principles”, equipments & new developments, 3rd edn. Three S Colors Publications, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  31. Nayak S, Tiwari GN (2008) Energy and exergy analysis of photovoltaic/thermal integrated with a solar greenhouse. Energy Build 40:2015–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nayak S, Kumar A, Mishra J, Tiwari GN (2011) Drying and testing of mint (Mentha Piperita) by a Hybrid Photovoltaic-Thermal (PVT)-based greenhouse dryer. Dry Technol 29:1002–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prakash O (2015) Design and performance analysis of modified greenhouse dryer. Ph.D. Thesis in the Department of Energy, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal (India)Google Scholar
  34. Prakash O, Kumar A (2013a) Historical and recent trend of solar drying system: a review. Int J Green Energy J 10(7):690–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prakash O, Kumar A (2013b) ANFIS prediction model of a modified active greenhouse dryer in no-load conditions in the month of january. Int J Adv Comp Res 3(1):220–223Google Scholar
  36. Prakash O, Kumar A (2014a) Solar greenhouse drying: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:905–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prakash O, Kumar A (2014b) Design, development and testing of modified greenhouse dryer under natural convection. Heat Trans Res 45(5):433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prakash O, Kumar A (2014c) Thermal performance evaluation of modified active greenhouse dryer. J Build Phys 37(4):395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prakash O, Kumar A (2014d) Environomical analysis and mathematical modeling for tomato flakes drying in modified greenhouse dryer under active mode. Int J Food Eng 10(4):669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prakash O, Kumar A (2014e) ANFIS modeling of a natural convection greenhouse drying system for jaggery: an experimental validation. Int J Sustain Energy 33(02):316–335MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prakash O, Kumar A (2014f) Application of artificial neural network for prediction of jaggery mass during drying inside natural convection greenhouse dryer. Int J Amb Energy 35(4):186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prakash O, Kumar A (2015) Annual performance of modified greenhouse dryer under passive mode in no-load conditions. Int J Green Energy 12:1091–1099MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prakash O, Kumar O, Kaviti A, Vishwanatha P (2015) Prediction of moisture evaporation rate from jaggery in green house drying using fuzzy logic. Heat Trans Res 46(10):923–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prakash O, Kumar A, Sharaf-Eldeen Y (2016a) Review of indian solar drying status. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports by Springer Press. doi:10.1007/s40518-016-0058-9
  45. Prakash O, Laguri V, Pandey A, Kumar A, Kumar A (2016b) Review on various modelling techniques for the solar dryers. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:396–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rachmat R, Horibe K (1999) Solar heat collector characteristics of a fibre reinforce plastic drying house. Trans ASAE 42(1):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rathore NS, Panwar NL (2010) Experimental studies on hemi cylindrical walk-in type solar tunnel dryer for grape drying. Appl Energy 87:2764–2767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rathore NS, Panwar NL (2011) Design and development of energy efficient solar tunnel dryer for industrial drying. Clean Techn Environ Policy 13:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ronoh EK, Kanali CL, Mailutha JT, Shitanda D (2010) Thin layer drying kinetics of amaranth (amaranthus cruentus) grains in a natural convection solar tent dryer. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 10(33)Google Scholar
  50. Sami K, Abdelhamid F, Ali B (2007) Drying of red pepper in open sun and greenhouse conditions mathematical modeling and experimental validation. J Food Eng 79:1094–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santamouris M, Argiriou A, Vallindras M (1994) Design and operation of a low energy consumption passive solar agricultural greenhouse. Solar Energy 52(5):371–378Google Scholar
  52. Sethi VP, Arora S (2009) Improvement in greenhouse solar drying using inclined north wall reflection. Sol Energy 83:1472–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silva C, Ferreira JG, Bricker SB, Delvalls TA, Martín-Diaz ML, Yanez E (2011) Site selection for shellfish aquaculture by means of GIS and farm-scale models, with an emphasis on data-poor environments. Aquaculture 318(3–4):444–4578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tiwari GN, Goyal RK (1998) Greenhouse technology. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 117–187Google Scholar
  55. Tiwari GN, Din M, Shrivastava NSL, Jain D, Sodha MS (2002) Evaluation of solar fraction (Fn) for north wall of a controlled environment greenhouse: an experimental validation. Int J Energy Res 26:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tiwari GN, Gupta A, Gupta R (2003) Evaluation of solar fraction on north partition wall for various shapes of solarium by Auto-CAD. Energ Buildings 35:507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tiwari GN, Kumar S, Prakash O (2004) Evaluation of convective mass transfer coefficient during drying of jaggery. J Food Eng 63:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turhan K (2006) An investigation on the performance improvement of greenhouse-type agricultural dryers. Renew Energy 31:1055–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Kumar
    • 1
  • Harsh Deep
    • 2
  • Om Prakash
    • 2
    Email author
  • O. V. Ekechukwu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Energy (Energy Centre)Maulana Azad National Institute of TechnologyBhopalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBirla Institute of TechnologyRanchiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations